top of page

By:

Yogesh Sharma

21 April 2026 at 1:42:15 pm

NEET Row Puts 'Latur Pattern' Under Cloud

Latur, long celebrated as one of Maharashtra’s most prominent educational hubs, has found itself at the centre of controversy following discussions surrounding alleged irregularities and paper leak claims linked to the NEET examination. While investigations into the matter are still underway and no conclusive evidence directly connecting Latur to any organised paper leak has officially emerged so far, the city’s name has repeatedly surfaced in media discussions and social media debates,...

NEET Row Puts 'Latur Pattern' Under Cloud

Latur, long celebrated as one of Maharashtra’s most prominent educational hubs, has found itself at the centre of controversy following discussions surrounding alleged irregularities and paper leak claims linked to the NEET examination. While investigations into the matter are still underway and no conclusive evidence directly connecting Latur to any organised paper leak has officially emerged so far, the city’s name has repeatedly surfaced in media discussions and social media debates, leading to widespread speculation and reputational damage. The controversy has triggered concern among students, parents, coaching institutes, teachers and citizens, many of whom believe that Latur’s image is being unfairly tarnished without verified facts. Over the years, the city has built a nationwide reputation for academic excellence, disciplined study culture and success in competitive examinations. However, recent allegations and viral claims have placed the entire educational ecosystem under suspicion. Education Hub For decades, the “Latur Pattern” has been regarded as a model of academic discipline and result-oriented education. Students from rural Maharashtra and several neighbouring states have travelled to Latur to prepare for examinations such as NEET, JEE and MHT-CET. Thousands of doctors, engineers, civil servants and professionals have emerged from institutions in the city. Latur’s education model became especially popular for offering structured learning methods and comparatively affordable coaching opportunities to students from modest backgrounds. Yet, with the rapid expansion of the coaching industry and increasing pressure associated with competitive exams, concerns regarding commercialisation and extreme academic competition have also grown in recent years. Against this backdrop, the emergence of the so-called “Latur connection” in the NEET controversy has deeply disturbed the city’s academic community. Spreading Rumours Much of the controversy intensified after certain social media posts, alleged screenshots, viral chats, audio clips and claims regarding similarities in practice tests began circulating online. Several unverified posts linked coaching centres and students from Latur to the alleged NEET paper leak, despite the absence of official confirmation. The phrase “Latur connection” quickly began trending across platforms, resulting in widespread assumptions and speculation. Citizens say incomplete information and sensational narratives have created confusion across the country. Parents in Latur claim they have been receiving calls from relatives and acquaintances asking whether the city was truly involved in a paper leak racket. Many students say they are being viewed with suspicion merely because they belong to Latur, despite having prepared honestly for years. Restraint by Administration District authorities and police officials have attempted to calm the situation by urging the public not to spread misinformation. Latur Collector Dr. Bharat Bastewad has reportedly clarified that no direct evidence linking the city to any confirmed paper leak had emerged during preliminary inquiries. Authorities have acknowledged that statements from certain students, counsellors and individuals associated with coaching institutes were recorded as part of routine investigation procedures. However, officials emphasised that questioning individuals during an inquiry should not be interpreted as proof of guilt. Police sources have also indicated that several viral claims circulating on social media lack authenticity and may not withstand scrutiny during formal investigation. According to officials, many screenshots, audio recordings and online messages being shared publicly appear suspicious or unverifiable. The administration has appealed to citizens and media organisations to exercise patience until official findings are released. Psychological Pressure Perhaps the most severe impact of the controversy is being felt by students preparing for or appearing in competitive examinations. NEET aspirants often spend two to three years preparing rigorously, studying for 10 to 12 hours daily under immense academic pressure. Now, many students say their hard work is being overshadowed by suspicion and online allegations. Parents report that students are facing uncomfortable questions and judgment simply because they belong to Latur. Mental health experts warn that such controversies can significantly affect students’ emotional well-being. Fear of exam cancellation, uncertainty about results, and continuous public debate around cheating allegations may lead to anxiety, stress, insecurity and frustration among aspirants. Several parents have expressed concern that honest students are becoming unintended victims of a larger controversy. Coaching Industry The issue may also affect Latur’s extensive coaching ecosystem. Every year, thousands of students migrate to the city seeking preparation for competitive examinations. However, the present atmosphere of suspicion could impact future admissions and public confidence. Representatives from coaching institutions argue that blaming an entire city based on isolated allegations would be unjust. They have supported strict investigation and action against anyone found guilty, but insist that Latur should not be declared culpable before the inquiry is complete. Educationists believe the issue should be viewed from a broader national perspective rather than being reduced to one city’s image. Beyond Cities Education experts point out that allegations of paper leaks and examination malpractice are not limited to any one region. Over the years, multiple competitive examinations across India have faced accusations ranging from security breaches to organised cheating networks. Therefore, they argue, the focus should shift towards strengthening the examination system itself. Experts have called for stronger digital surveillance, tighter logistical control over question paper distribution, advanced encryption systems and stricter monitoring at examination centres. The enormous commercialisation surrounding competitive examinations, coupled with pressure to produce ranks and results at any cost, has also created conditions where unethical practices may emerge in some cases. Many believe this larger structural issue deserves serious national attention. (The write is an Assistant Professor at Dayanand College of Commerce, Latur and a journalist. Views Personal.)

PR Stunts in Bollywood: Hits and Misses

Updated: Oct 21, 2024

PR Stunts in Bollywood: Hits and Misses

The film industry, like any other, is filled with both good and bad people. Recent incidents in Bollywood, however, have shown how public relations (PR) tactics can make or break a film. We’ve often seen actors promoting each other’s films and even rivals coming together, like the two Khans forgetting their past differences. But some recent PR moves have been disastrous for one film while working for another. Let’s talk about the contrasting fates of Jigra and Stree 2.


Karan Johar’s Jigra, starring Alia Bhatt, was a much-talked-about revenge drama. Despite the initial hype, it failed miserably at the box office, and many point to PR blunders as a reason. One of the key criticisms was the perception of nepotism, with Johar casting Alia Bhatt, a regular in his films. Adding fuel to the fire, the premiere show was cancelled, with Johar stating it was to “preserve the cinematic experience for all.” This raised eyebrows—why, then, wereprevious films shown to the media before release? Was it a PR strategy that backfired? It certainly didn’t work this time.


Another PR misstep came when director Vasan Bala said Jigra was never meant for Alia Bhatt, and that Karan Johar had sent her the script without his knowledge. Later, Johar clarified that Bala was only referring to grammatical errors in the script. Still, the damage was already done, and the PR gimmick fell flat.


To make matters worse, Divya Kumar Khosla, wife of T-Series head Bhushan Kumar, publicly attacked Jigra’s box office collections, even sharing pictures of empty theatres. This controversy allegedly stemmed from a story feud between Jigra and a film produced by Mukesh Bhatt called Saavi, where both films had similar themes—Jigra featuring a sister fighting for her brother, and Saavi about a wife fighting for her husband. The rivalry led to unnecessary public mudslinging, which only added to Jigra’s downfall.

On top of these issues, Manipur-based actor Bijou Thaangjam accused Jigra’s makers of unprofessionalism, claiming his dates were blocked for the film without confirmation of his role, resulting in the loss of other opportunities. He also raised concerns about how North-East actors are often treated by big production houses. This controversy added further negative PR for Jigra.


Despite all these PR attempts, the film’s fate could not be changed. In the end, as the Hindi saying goes, “Chura kharbuje par gire ya kharbuja chure par, katna toh kharbuja hi hai”—meaning, no matter what happens, the outcome was inevitable.


In contrast, Stree 2, another film that faced its own PR challenges, turned out to be a box office hit. Actor Aparshakti Khurana recently found himself caught in a controversy when he commented on the credits for the film’s success, which many interpreted as taking a jab at the lead actors. Fans of Rajkummar Rao and Shraddha Kapoor debated over who deserved more credit for the film’s success, overshadowing the contributions of others, including director Amar Kaushik.


Khurana later clarified that the success of the film should be celebrated, rather than getting entangled in debates about credit. Despite the PR blunders, Stree 2 was saved by its strong storyline, songs, and performances, proving that a film’s quality ultimately speaks louder than PR tactics.


At the end of the day, a film’s success depends on whether the common audience likes it. No amount of PR manipulation can change that. Filmmakers should remember that while they might try to sway public opinion, they cannot fool the aam aadmi.


(The author is a communication professional. Views personal.)

bottom of page