top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s...

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s Secretariat at Rashtrapati Bhavan, replied to Sarda on forwarding his complaint to the Ministry of Home Affairs for necessary action. It further stated that action taken in the matter must be conveyed directly to Sarda. “It’s a pleasant surprise indeed that the President has taken serious note of the issue of insults to the National Flag at night-clubs, pubs, lounges, sports bars and other places all over the country. The blatant mishandling of the National Flag also violates the specially laid-down provisions of the Flag Code of India,” said Sarda. He pointed out that the Tricolor is a sacred symbol and not a ‘commercial prop’ for entertainment purposes to be used by artists without disregard for the rules. “There are multiple videos, reels or photos available on social media… It's painful to view how the National Flag is being grossly misused, disrespected and even displayed at late nights or early morning hours, flouting the rules,” Sarda said. The more worrisome aspect is that such transgressions are occurring openly, repeatedly and apparently without any apprehensions for the potential consequences. This indicates serious lapses in the enforcement and supervision, but such unchecked abuse could portend dangerous signals that national symbols can be ‘trivialized and traded for profits’. He urged the President to direct the issue of stringent written guidelines with circular to all such private or commercial outlets on mandatory compliance with the Flag Code of India, conduct special awareness drives, surprise checks on such venues and regular inspections to curb the misuse of the Tricolour. Flag Code of India, 2002 Perturbed over the “perceptible lack of awareness” not only among the masses but also governmental agencies with regard to the laws, practices and conventions for displaying the National Flag as per the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, the centre had brought out the detailed 25-page Flag Code of India, 2002. The Flag Code of India has minute guidelines on the display of the Tricolour, the happy occasions when it flies high, or the sad times when it is at half-mast, the privileged dignitaries who are entitled to display it on their vehicles, etc. Certain violations attract hefty fines and/or imprisonment till three years.

Privacy in Pieces: The Enduring Relevance of The Conversation

Updated: Nov 29, 2024

Privacy in Pieces

50 years since its release, Francis Ford Coppola’s ‘The Conversation’ (1974) remains a masterclass in paranoia, a film whose prescient themes about surveillance, privacy, and moral ambiguity resonate more deeply today than ever. Emerging from the embers of the Watergate scandal, Coppola’s taut, minimalist thriller was both a product of its time and a harbinger of ours. It was as if Coppola, riding high on a hectic creative crest – ‘The Godfather’ (1972) and ‘The Godfather II’ (1974) – was speaking to 2024 with ‘The Conversation’s’ theme of omnipresent technology and eroded trust in institutions blur the line between privacy and exposure.


The film stars Gene Hackman as Harry Caul, a surveillance expert whose technical prowess is matched only by his crippling guilt and emotional detachment. Hackman delivers his career-defining performance here, embodying a man unravelling under the weight of his own complicity in potential violence. ‘The Conversation’ is not merely a thriller but a character study of a man undone by his own expertise. Hackman’s Harry Caul is a virtuoso of listening, yet incapable of connection, a contradiction that Hackman conveys with heartbreaking subtlety. Harry’s attempts to shield himself from intimacy only highlight his vulnerability, making him an unwitting victim of the very skills that define him.


Set against the paranoia zeitgeist of post-Watergate America, The Conversation captures a nation unsettled by scandal and power abuses. The Nixon-era Watergate break-in, with its clandestine recordings and shadowy operatives, loomed large over the decade, finding mirrors in the 1970s decade of the ‘American New Wave.’ Coppola’s choice to make Harry a character consumed by his work resonates in our era of whistleblowers and data breaches.


The Conversation belongs to a lineage of contemporaries like Alan J. Pakula’s ‘The Parallax View’ (1974), Sydney Pollack’s ‘Three Days of the Condor’ and Pakula’s ‘All the President’s Men’ (1976) on the Watergate scandal itself.


Whereas ‘The Parallax View,’ a conspiracy thriller with Warren Beatty’s investigative journalist uncovering a labyrinthine plot by a mysterious corporation, is a frenetic ride into the heart of conspiracy, The Conversation is insular and introspective. Coppola eschews overt thrills for a quieter dread, using surveillance not merely as a tool of control but as a lens to examine moral accountability. The taped conversations that drive the plot function as a kind of confession — what is overheard implicates both the speaker and the listener. The paranoid soundscape of the film is the creation of another genius - editor Walter Murch, whose remarkable sound mixing and editing is the soul of 'The Conversation.'


Today, surveillance capitalism has turned the tools of eavesdropping into everyday conveniences with Harry Caul’s world of reel-to-reel recorders giving way to smartphones, social media and artificial intelligence. Alexa listens; algorithms predict. Unlike Harry, we participate willingly, trading privacy for convenience.


That Hackman did not even receive an Oscar nomination for this role (overshadowed by Art Carney’s sentimental turn in ‘Harry and Tonto’) remains a glaring omission in cinematic history. His portrayal of vulnerability and moral conflict in ‘The Conversation’ arguably surpasses his Oscar-winning turn in The French Connection (1971).


David Shire’s plaintive piano theme is as integral to the film as its visual and narrative elements, underscoring Harry’s loneliness and the cyclical torment of his conscience. Minimalistic and haunting, Shire’s score mirrors Harry’s unravelling psyche, with its repeating, unresolved motifs echoing the obsessive looping of the tapes. Like Nino Rota’s iconic work on The Godfather, Shire’s music transcends the film, evoking a mood of melancholy and alienation that lingers long after the credits roll.


The film remains an enduring reminder of the fragility of trust in public and private life, depicting a world where surveillance erodes not only individual privacy but also collective faith in institutions.


As Coppola once remarked, The Conversation was inspired by Michelangelo Antonioni’s masterpiece Blow-Up (1966), a film about the elusive nature of truth. In Harry Caul’s descent into paranoia, Coppola crafted an American analogue: a cautionary tale for an era of uncertainty, as urgent in 2024 as it was in 1974.


In ‘The Conversation,’ privacy is not only a right but also a fragile illusion, a sentiment amplified in our hyperconnected age. Like Harry’s tapes, its relevance cannot be erased.

Comments


bottom of page