top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s...

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s Secretariat at Rashtrapati Bhavan, replied to Sarda on forwarding his complaint to the Ministry of Home Affairs for necessary action. It further stated that action taken in the matter must be conveyed directly to Sarda. “It’s a pleasant surprise indeed that the President has taken serious note of the issue of insults to the National Flag at night-clubs, pubs, lounges, sports bars and other places all over the country. The blatant mishandling of the National Flag also violates the specially laid-down provisions of the Flag Code of India,” said Sarda. He pointed out that the Tricolor is a sacred symbol and not a ‘commercial prop’ for entertainment purposes to be used by artists without disregard for the rules. “There are multiple videos, reels or photos available on social media… It's painful to view how the National Flag is being grossly misused, disrespected and even displayed at late nights or early morning hours, flouting the rules,” Sarda said. The more worrisome aspect is that such transgressions are occurring openly, repeatedly and apparently without any apprehensions for the potential consequences. This indicates serious lapses in the enforcement and supervision, but such unchecked abuse could portend dangerous signals that national symbols can be ‘trivialized and traded for profits’. He urged the President to direct the issue of stringent written guidelines with circular to all such private or commercial outlets on mandatory compliance with the Flag Code of India, conduct special awareness drives, surprise checks on such venues and regular inspections to curb the misuse of the Tricolour. Flag Code of India, 2002 Perturbed over the “perceptible lack of awareness” not only among the masses but also governmental agencies with regard to the laws, practices and conventions for displaying the National Flag as per the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, the centre had brought out the detailed 25-page Flag Code of India, 2002. The Flag Code of India has minute guidelines on the display of the Tricolour, the happy occasions when it flies high, or the sad times when it is at half-mast, the privileged dignitaries who are entitled to display it on their vehicles, etc. Certain violations attract hefty fines and/or imprisonment till three years.

Ray’s Masterpiece Restored and Re-Released After 59 Years

Once again, producers R. D. Bansal and family have brought back a 2K restored version of Satyajit Ray’s Nayak across Indian theatres on 21st February after 59 years; the film had previously premiered in 1966. The restored print includes English subtitles. Varsha Bansal, granddaughter of R.D. Bansal and representing the RDB Organisation, has taken charge of this rebirth. Uttam Kumar was apprehensive about Satyajit Ray presenting him in Nayak without make-up. He had never done this before. In mid-1965, when shooting for Nayak began, Uttam Kumar had just recovered from a bout of chickenpox. Ray asked him to touch up his face only in flashback scenes as if he were a younger man. When the shooting was over, Uttam Kumar said, ‘‘I have discovered a new side to myself. Unhindered by make-up, I felt freer while expressing my emotions.’’


Critics and filmmakers initially came down with hammers and tongs against the film, the main grouse being the casting of Uttam Kumar as the film's hero. They concurred that Ray could have easily chosen an equally talented actor to portray the role of Arindam Mukherjee in the film. Looking back on the film, the critics turned around and said in a chorus that Nayak was perhaps the most outstanding performance of Uttam Kumar in his entire career, where he remained the numero uno till he passed away at a comparatively young age.


This writer chooses, for a change, to read Nayak as a road movie, as it is a journey from Kolkata to Delhi on the Rajdhani Express. The span of the film covers this journey, beginning with the train chugging off and ending at New Delhi railway station.


The road strips away moral virtues, exposing people to their bare essentials, often leading to introspection and philosophy when they leave the comfort of the familiar for the unknown. However, this notion doesn’t entirely hold true for the Indian road movie. Take, for instance, Satyajit Ray’s Nayak—where the film star protagonist embarks on a journey to Delhi, not in search of self-discovery, but to receive the National Award. His secretary failed to get air bookings, so he was forced to travel by Rajdhani Express. Irritated with the unwanted attention of fellow commuters, he goes to the dining car. There, he chances upon Aditi, an editor of a woman's magazine who is travelling to Delhi to receive a grant for her magazine. The physical and geographical journey changes into a journey of introspection for the hero and of discovery for the journalist. To celebrate their brief bonding, Aditi tears up the sheets where she had noted the interview, and when the engine arrives at the Delhi train station, the two part ways.


Says Dipankar De Sarkar in his re-reading of the film: “According to Ray, through Nayak, he wanted to: 1. Investigate the psychology of a movie star; 2. Investigate the psychology of fans; 3. Make a film about a train journey. But there’s one element in the critical narrative about Nayak that remains underplayed, and that is the character played by Tagore.”


The journey unfolds through flashbacks, including a few nightmarish scenes from the hero’s perspective. His past traces his rise from a small-town theatre actor to a film star, but the film omits details of his family background, as they seem unnecessary in retrospect.


The Rajdhani Express carries multiple journeys within its journey. Aditi’s past remains unknown, except for what emerges in conversation. She is single, has a cousin who edits a women’s magazine, and recognises Mukherjee’s name and face but has rarely watched his films.


As the train pulls into Delhi railway station, fans crowd around the hero, greeting him with bouquets and garlands. A crowd forms, but the journalist quietly walks away with her uncle. The hero tries to catch her eye over the heads of the crowd, but she does not turn back.


For her, it was a fleeting yet memorable encounter. For him, an emotional journey he never anticipated. The train’s journey from Kolkata to Delhi is real but layered with stories branching from the hero’s meeting with the obscure editor. Through his interview with Aditi, Arindam’s inner journey unfolds in flashbacks—from a suburban theatre actor to a matinee idol. While the train moves forward, his memories pull him back into the past.


Nayak is a perfect blend of technical and aesthetic craftsmanship. Every aspect—acting, framing, sound design, and art direction—is meticulously executed. Bansi Chandragupta’s brilliance shines in his creation of an entire train solely for the shoot. Sharmila Tagore, free from her starry razzmatazz, delivers a subtle and restrained performance. Nayak is not just a film; it is the film—a masterclass for today’s filmmakers and students.


(The author is a films researcher based on Kolkata.)

Comments


bottom of page