top of page

By:

Rahul Kulkarni

30 March 2025 at 3:32:54 pm

The Boundary Collapse

When kindness becomes micromanagement It started with a simple leave request.   “Hey, can I take Friday off? Need a personal day,” Meera messaged Rohit. Rohit replied instantly:   “Of course. All good. Just stay reachable if anything urgent comes up.”   He meant it as reassurance. But the team didn’t hear reassurance. They heard a rule.   By noon, two things had shifted inside The Workshop:   Meera felt guilty for even asking. Everyone else quietly updated their mental handbook: Leave is...

The Boundary Collapse

When kindness becomes micromanagement It started with a simple leave request.   “Hey, can I take Friday off? Need a personal day,” Meera messaged Rohit. Rohit replied instantly:   “Of course. All good. Just stay reachable if anything urgent comes up.”   He meant it as reassurance. But the team didn’t hear reassurance. They heard a rule.   By noon, two things had shifted inside The Workshop:   Meera felt guilty for even asking. Everyone else quietly updated their mental handbook: Leave is allowed… but not really. This is boundary collapse… when a leader’s good intentions unintentionally blur the limits that protect autonomy and rest. When care quietly turns into control Founders rarely intend to micromanage.   What looks like control from the outside often starts as care from the inside. “Let me help before something breaks.” “Let me stay involved so we don’t lose time.” “Loop me in… I don’t want you stressed.” Supportive tone.   Good intentions.   But one invisible truth defines workplace psychology: When power says “optional,” it never feels optional.
So when a client requested a revision, Rohit gently pinged:   “If you’re free, could you take a look?” Of course she logged in.   Of course she handled it.   And by Monday, the cultural shift was complete: Leave = location change, not a boundary.   A founder’s instinct had quietly become a system. Pattern 1: The Generous Micromanager Modern micromanagement rarely looks aggressive. It looks thoughtful :   “Let me refine this so you’re not stuck.” “I’ll review it quickly.”   “Share drafts so we stay aligned.”   Leaders believe they’re being helpful. Teams hear:   “You don’t fully trust me.” “I should check with you before finishing anything.”   “My decisions aren’t final.” Gentle micromanagement shrinks ownership faster than harsh micromanagement ever did because people can’t challenge kindness. Pattern 2: Cultural conditioning around availability In many Indian workplaces, “time off” has an unspoken footnote: Be reachable. Just in case. No one says it directly.   No one pushes back openly.   The expectation survives through habit: Leave… but monitor messages. Rest… but don’t disconnect. Recover… but stay alert. Contrast this with a global team we worked with: A designer wrote,   “I’ll be off Friday, but available if needed.” Her manager replied:   “If you’re working on your off-day, we mismanaged the workload… not the boundary.”   One conversation.   Two cultural philosophies.   Two completely different emotional outcomes.   Pattern 3: The override reflex Every founder has a version of this reflex.   Whenever Rohit sensed risk, real or imagined, he stepped in: Rewriting copy.   Adjusting a design.   Rescoping a task.   Reframing an email. Always fast.   Always polite.   Always “just helping.” But each override delivered one message:   “Your autonomy is conditional.” You own decisions…   until the founder feels uneasy.   You take initiative…   until instinct replaces delegation.   No confrontation.   No drama.   Just quiet erosion of confidence.   The family-business amplification Boundary collapse becomes extreme in family-managed companies.   We worked with one firm where four family members… founder, spouse, father, cousin… all had informal authority. Everyone cared.   Everyone meant well.   But for employees, decision-making became a maze: Strategy approved by the founder.   Aesthetics by the spouse.   Finance by the father. Tone by the cousin.   They didn’t need leadership.   They needed clarity.   Good intentions without boundaries create internal anarchy. The global contrast A European product team offered a striking counterexample.   There, the founder rarely intervened mid-stream… not because of distance, but because of design:   “If you own the decision, you own the consequences.” Decision rights were clear.   Escalation paths were explicit.   Authority didn’t shift with mood or urgency. No late-night edits.   No surprise rewrites.   No “quick checks.”   No emotional overrides. As one designer put it:   “If my boss wants to intervene, he has to call a decision review. That friction protects my autonomy.” The result:   Faster execution, higher ownership and zero emotional whiplash. Boundaries weren’t personal.   They were structural .   That difference changes everything. Why boundary collapse is so costly Its damage is not dramatic.   It’s cumulative.   People stop resting → you get presence, not energy.   People stop taking initiative → decisions freeze.   People stop trusting empowerment → autonomy becomes theatre.   People start anticipating the boss → performance becomes emotional labour.   People burn out silently → not from work, but from vigilance.   Boundary collapse doesn’t create chaos.   It creates hyper-alertness, the heaviest tax on any team. The real paradox Leaders think they’re being supportive. Teams experience supervision.   Leaders assume boundaries are obvious. Teams see boundaries as fluid. Leaders think autonomy is granted. Teams act as though autonomy can be revoked at any moment. This is the Boundary Collapse → a misunderstanding born not from intent, but from the invisible weight of power. Micromanagement today rarely looks like anger.   More often,   it looks like kindness without limits. (Rahul Kulkarni is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. He patterns the human mechanics of scaling where workplace behavior quietly shapes business outcomes. Views personal.)

Reading the Economic Tea Leaves

Updated: Jan 31

Part 3:

A mixed bag of high-frequency indicators suggests India's economic recovery is uneven, but not without promise.


Nirmala Sitharaman

As Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman prepares to unveil the Union Budget on February 1, 2025, policymakers are poring over a complex set of economic signals. Gross Domestic Product figures, while crucial, arrive with a time lag, making High-Frequency Indicators (HFIs) the go-to barometers for assessing India’s economic pulse in real time. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the maestro of macroeconomics, pieces together these fragmented signals from agriculture, industry, and services, painting a portrait of where the country stands.


On the surface, the agricultural sector is basking in a monsoonal afterglow. Water reservoir levels surged to 139.4 billion cubic meters by mid-December, a striking 24 percent increase over last year, setting the stage for a robust second half of FY25. Kharif food grain production hit 164.7 million tonnes—an 11 percent jump—while Rabi sowing inched up by 1.6 percent. Tractor sales, a reliable barometer of rural confidence, climbed to 690,000 units between April and November, signalling resilience. The government’s decision to hike the Minimum Support Price (MSP) by 5 to 12.7 percent across crops has bolstered rural purchasing power, hinting at a GDP boost ahead. Inflationary fears linger, but for now, agriculture appears to be on steady ground.


Passenger vehicle sales, a key indicator of urban demand, experienced a dip in the second quarter but saw a strong recovery during the Diwali season in the third quarter. Domestic air traffic, while still positive, grew by a modest 6.8 percent from April to October, a marked slowdown from the 19.3 percent growth in the same period the previous year. Fuel consumption rose by 3.3 percent from April to November, compared to a 5 percent increase in the prior year. Similarly, power consumption saw a more subdued growth of 3.9 percent, reaching 1,149.5 billion units, down from 9.7 percent the year before. Meanwhile, the agriculture sector’s buoyant performance has buoyed rural demand, cushioning the effects of a tepid urban market.


Unemployment remains a political flashpoint, often wielded by opposition parties to take aim at the government. The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey pegs urban unemployment at 6.4 percent—an improvement, but one that masks a stark gender disparity. While male unemployment stands at 5.7 percent, female unemployment hovers at 8.3 percent. Encouragingly, new Employees’ Provident Fund enrolments crossed 10.5 million between April and October, up from 8.2 million the previous year, and demand for work under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act fell by 13.3 percent, suggesting that more rural jobs are emerging outside the safety net.


Then, there’s inflation, a spectre that looms over every economic conversation. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) softened to 4.9 percent between April and November, compared to 5.2 percent the previous year. Core inflation, stripped of volatile food and fuel prices, has cooled to 3.2 percent. But food inflation, the metric that weighs most heavily on household budgets, has risen to 7.9 percent, up from 6.6 percent last year. The Wholesale Price Index (WPI) has rebounded from a 1.3 percent contraction to a 2 percent increase, reflecting an economy where supply-chain pressures are shifting.


Global forces complicate the RBI’s calculus. With the rupee showing signs of depreciation and the Federal Reserve’s rate trajectory uncertain, India’s central bank has opted for patience, keeping policy rates untouched. A Trumpian return to protectionism in the U.S. could disrupt trade flows, while the fragile Israel-Hamas ceasefire may determine the next moves in global energy markets.


One missing piece in this puzzle is private investment, which remains sluggish despite government spending driving infrastructure expansion. India’s industrialists, historically cautious in uncertain times, have held back on large-scale capital expenditures, wary of volatile global conditions and policy risks. While the production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes have seen some success, they have not yet triggered a full-scale private investment boom. The government will be under pressure to balance fiscal prudence with populist spending.


In the months ahead, India’s economic story will be a balancing act between rural optimism and urban sluggishness, between inflationary caution and growth imperatives, between domestic policy and global volatility. The tea leaves are there for the reading; the real question is who gets to write the script.


(The author is a Chartered Accountant and works at Authomotive Division of Mahindra and Mahindra Limited. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page