top of page

By:

Anusreeta Dutta

26 April 2026 at 1:22:24 pm

One Maharashtra, Unequal Priorities

Six decades after statehood, constitutional safeguards remain necessary to bridge the gap between western Maharashtra and the regions left behind. Maharashtra is often referred to as India’s economic engine. The state, which is home to Mumbai’s financial ecosystem and Pune’s industrial corridor, contributes about 14 percent to the GDP of India. There is a long-standing dispute behind this achievement that has affected state politics for decades. Is every district in Maharashtra thriving at...

One Maharashtra, Unequal Priorities

Six decades after statehood, constitutional safeguards remain necessary to bridge the gap between western Maharashtra and the regions left behind. Maharashtra is often referred to as India’s economic engine. The state, which is home to Mumbai’s financial ecosystem and Pune’s industrial corridor, contributes about 14 percent to the GDP of India. There is a long-standing dispute behind this achievement that has affected state politics for decades. Is every district in Maharashtra thriving at the same pace? It is not just a political question. It is written into the Constitution proper. Unlike most states in India, Maharashtra has a unique constitutional provision under Article 371(2) which empowers the Governor to ensure that development funding and opportunities are equally shared between Vidarbha, Marathwada and the rest of Maharashtra. The clause was born out of fears that some areas would be forgotten once the state was established in 1960. Six decades later, the existence of this constitutional safeguard raises an uncomfortable question: why does Maharashtra need tools to balance regional development still? Regional Disparity The seeds of regional disparity were sown long before the birth of Maharashtra. Western Maharashtra had early investments in irrigation, cooperative sugar mills, educational institutions and transportation. The centres of industrial growth followed by agricultural commercialisation were Pune, Satara, Sangli, Kolhapur and part of Nashik. Vidarbha and Marathwada chose the other. Agriculture was still heavily dependent on monsoon rains, industrialization was slow and irrigation coverage was less than the state averages. Regional studies in Maharashtra have repeatedly shown that irrigation intensity and agricultural yield are higher in western districts than in much of eastern Maharashtra. These differences subsequently led to calls for institutional safeguards. In contrast, in western Maharashtra, government moves are increasingly geared towards growth, not deficit reduction. The region’s success is built on industrial corridors, logistics infrastructure, urban mobility projects and advanced manufacturing clusters. Pune has emerged as a hub for vehicles, computer technology, defence production and startups. Mumbai remains a major draw for investment in metro rail networks, coastal roadways, financial services infrastructure and international business zones. Agricultural practices in western Maharashtra are in a relatively advanced stage of development. Irrigation coverage is much better than many districts in the east, so the authorities can concentrate on raising productivity, export-oriented, value-added farming and agro-processing industries. Western Maharashtra’s policy, in a nutshell, is to make competitive regions more competitive. Eastern Maharashtra is very different. Here, the Governments have not only focused on accelerating growth but also on reducing the backlog of development. The main policy question is irrigation. For many decades official studies have consistently identified irrigation as the most important factor for regional disparities. Even with dedicated funds, the backlog of irrigation in Vidarbha and Marathwada kept growing, requiring repeated interventions by successive governments. To tackle this, region-specific irrigation corporations, such as Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) and Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) were established with a specific mandate to speed up water infrastructure projects. The Union Government has sanctioned a special irrigation package for Vidarbha, Marathwada and draught prone areas of Maharashtra, with an objective to increase irrigation potential and improve water security of the farmers. Even today, a lot of public money is spent on irrigation projects in eastern Maharashtra. Government affidavits and parliamentary replies say crores of rupees are spent every year to make up for irrigation shortfalls and to finish long-pending projects. This emphasis reflects an important reality: while the western part of Maharashtra talks about competitiveness, the eastern part of Maharashtra continues to debate water access. Another area where there are divergent approaches is industrial policy. Market forces have played a major role in the industrial expansion of western Maharashtra, a process assisted by the existing infrastructure and urbanization. In contrast, Eastern Maharashtra has frequently depended on state-led interventions to draw investment to lagging regions. Projects such as the Multi-modal International Cargo Hub and Airport at Nagpur (MIHAN), logistics corridors, special industrial incentives and infrastructure subsidies were to divert industrial expansion away from the Mumbai-Pune region. Likewise, recent government announcements have earmarked Vidarbha to become a future hub for solar energy, semiconductors, aerospace manufacturing and logistics, with Marathwada being pitched for electric vehicle and electronics investments. Whereas in western Maharashtra, the policy tends to buttress pre-existing advantages, in eastern Maharashtra the industrial policy aims to generate such advantages from the beginning. Regional Equilibrium These divisions have persisted, leading to separate institutions of governance. Vidarbha and Marathwada have statutory development boards to monitor regional imbalances and recommend corrective actions. Their emergence is an indication of a broader acceptance that market forces alone have not been adequate to promote balanced growth in Maharashtra. The second capital of Maharashtra is also Nagpur. The same ideology. The state legislature meets every winter in eastern Maharashtra to ensure that the issues concerning the region remain in the political focus. The issues discussed generally are irrigation, agriculture, tribal welfare and regional development in these sessions. The controversy over regional equity, however, is still unresolved. According to critics, despite decades of special packages and focused strategies, many irrigation projects continue to face delays, cost overruns and implementation problems. Several big projects in Vidarbha remain incomplete despite years of cash pledges. There is now a growing body of policy thinking that suggests that Maharashtra may have to give up the very terminology of backlog elimination. In its own discussion on balanced regional development, the state attaches more importance to reforms in governance, diversification of the economy and speeding up growth, than to compensatory spending. The challenge is not just building canals and roadways anymore but building lasting economic ecosystems that can hold on to talent, draw investment and create jobs beyond the traditional Mumbai-Pune boom corridor. The real test for Maharashtra will be whether future policies can turn Vidarbha and Marathwada from regions requiring special support to regions capable of driving growth on their own. Till then Maharashtra’s development story will be two stories. (The author is a columnist and climate researcher with experience in political research analysis and energy policy. Views personal.)

Rewriting the Polar Ledger

Kaamya Karthikeyan’s skiing odyssey to the South Pole crowns a teenage career built on astonishing willpower and endurance.

At 18, Kaamya Karthikeyan has become the youngest Indian and the second-youngest woman anywhere to ski to the South Pole. It is a feat that sounds deceptively neat in a newspaper headline which somehow fails to capture the gruelling reality of this stupendous achievement involving weeks of hauling a sled across the Antarctic nothingness, in temperatures that punish skin and spirit alike. In an age addicted to spectacle, Karthikeyan’s achievement is so striking precisely because it is so austere.


Anyone who has read even a little about Antarctica, whether in the grim stoicism of Apsley Cherry-Garrard’s ‘The Worst Journey in the World’ (1922) or the measured heroics of Roland Huntford’s dual biography of Scott and Amundsen (1979), knows that distances there are misleading. It is the conditions that punish.


Along Karthikeyan’s 115-kilometre route to the South Pole, temperatures sank to minus 30 degrees Celsius as winds scoured the surface, lifting hard ice crystals into blinding whiteouts. Beneath her skis lay sastrugi, or wind-carved ridges of frozen snow that sap momentum and patience in equal measure. She pulled her own sled throughout, carrying food, fuel and survival gear and completing the journey entirely on foot. This was the hardest way to complete a Polar Odyssey.


By becoming the youngest Indian to ski to the South Pole, Karthikeyan has inserted herself into a global narrative of exploration that still skews heavily Western. Polar history is crowded with Norwegians, Britons and Americans – from Amundsen and Shackleton to Ranulph Fiennes. In this narrative, Indians are scarce, and young Indian women as good as absent.


Now, Karthikeyan’s achievement complicates lazy assumptions about who gets to explore the extremes of the planet.


Polar travel is regulated, expensive and unforgiving of mistakes. Training regimes are clinical and include pulling weighted tyres to simulate sleds, learning to manage frostbite, mastering the tedious rituals of campcraft in sub-zero conditions. The Antarctic is not a place for dramatic heroics. Success depends on a mind-numbing routine which drains the reserves of one’s mental strength. It is only ski, eat, rest, repeat. The mind must learn to accept monotony as a condition of survival. For an 18-year-old to submit to this iron discipline says something essential about Karthikeyan’s character. Youth is usually associated with impatience, and Polar travel punishes it.


Raised in a naval household in Mumbai, Karthikeyan is the daughter of Commander S. Karthikeyan of the Indian Navy and educator Lavanya Karthikeyan. As an alumna of Navy Children School, she encountered the outdoors early, gravitating towards endurance sports that demand discipline rather than flash.


Mountaineering, long-distance trekking and polar travel form a niche within a niche, even globally. In India, where sporting aspiration is often funnelled towards cricket or increasingly, some Olympic disciplines, the idea of skiing across polar ice is almost eccentric.


And yet, before turning 18, Karthikeyan had already assembled a climbing résumé that would be impressive at any age. In 2024, she completed the Seven Summits Challenge, scaling the highest peaks on all seven continents - Everest, Aconcagua, Denali, Kilimanjaro, Elbrus, Vinson and Kosciuszko. She became the youngest Indian and the second-youngest woman globally to summit Mount Everest from the Nepal side. At 13, she had climbed Aconcagua in 2020 as the youngest girl to do so, and Mount Elbrus in 2018, combining the ascent with a ski descent - an uncommon feat even among seasoned climbers.


Karthikeyan’s has moved steadily from high-altitude mountaineering into polar travel, marking a shift from vertical suffering to horizontal endurance. The South Pole expedition places her on the final leg of the Explorer’s Grand Slam, a coveted milestone combining the Seven Summits with ski journeys to both poles. Now, with Antarctica behind her, only the North Pole remains.


The Grand Slam demands mastery across radically different environments. While few muster the courage to complete it, fewer still manage to do it so young.


Karthikeyan’s inspirations are telling. Rather than the heroes of a bygone era, she cites figures such as Felicity Aston, the British polar explorer known for solo, unsupported crossings. It is a lineage defined by self-sufficiency rather than spectacle. Today, a small ecosystem of endurance athletes is emerging, supported by global training networks and a growing appetite for unconventional achievement. Karthikeyan stands at the frontier of this shift, expanding the idea of what Indian sporting ambition can look like.


While Polar exploration remains male-heavy, culturally and numerically, Karthikeyan’s presence challenges that imbalance. Having reached the end of the Earth, Kaamya Karthikeyan is already looking beyond it.

Comments


bottom of page