top of page

By:

Amol Deshmukh and Vaibhav Mathkari

5 March 2025 at 11:13:08 pm

Can Maharashtra’s Food Industry Take Civic Responsibility?

The food industry can turn everyday business practices into everyday civic action. AI generated image We all love eating out. Maharashtra’s food culture is inseparable from its identity. From a small vada pav stall to a five-star hotel, and from a family restaurant to a large wedding caterer, food businesses are part of everyday life. What responsibility does a food business have towards the citizen? Is serving tasty food enough? Or should restaurants also minimise food and plastic waste,...

Can Maharashtra’s Food Industry Take Civic Responsibility?

The food industry can turn everyday business practices into everyday civic action. AI generated image We all love eating out. Maharashtra’s food culture is inseparable from its identity. From a small vada pav stall to a five-star hotel, and from a family restaurant to a large wedding caterer, food businesses are part of everyday life. What responsibility does a food business have towards the citizen? Is serving tasty food enough? Or should restaurants also minimise food and plastic waste, maintain clean kitchens, use safe ingredients, manage waste responsibly and avoid traffic problems outside their premises? Several countries are already asking these questions. Japan has made reducing food loss a national priority, bringing businesses, government agencies and citizens together to prevent usable food from becoming waste. France has taken steps to reduce single-use plastics, including plastic drinking-water bottles in collective catering. Singapore requires large commercial premises to segregate and manage food waste. The European Union is also working to reduce unnecessary single-use plastics and promote circular packaging. Maharashtra need not copy them. But they offer one lesson: civic responsibility cannot rest with the government alone. The food industry has a major role to play. What if Maharashtra took up an 11-point challenge? Imagine major hotels, restaurants, caterers and food establishments voluntarily adopting a civic charter. First, reduce food waste. Large kitchens should track daily waste and aim to cut it by 25 per cent and then 50 per cent. Food safe for consumption should, wherever possible and legally appropriate, be redirected for human consumption. The rest should go for composting, biogas or other scientific treatment. Second, reduce unnecessary plastic water bottles. If safe drinking water is available, why automatically give every customer a plastic bottle? Maharashtra can develop a model using glass, steel and refill systems. Third, rethink packaging. Food delivery has created mountains of packaging. Do we really need all this plastic? Reusable, recyclable and genuinely sustainable alternatives should be preferred. Fourth, end open dumping of food waste. Restaurants should not send organic waste to roadside dumping points. Segregation and treatment should be part of commercial food-waste management. Fifth, make healthy choices available. Menus should include lower-salt, lower-sugar and nutritionally balanced options. This is about choice, not telling people what to eat. Sixth, use cooking oil responsibly. Restaurants should record its use and replacement and ensure used oil goes through authorised channels. Food safety and environmental responsibility should go together. Seventh, make kitchen hygiene a culture, not a certificate. The World Health Organization’s principles are simple: keep clean; separate raw and cooked food; cook properly; maintain safe temperatures; and use safe water and raw materials. The challenge is making them daily habits. Eighth, give consumers a voice. A QR code could allow customers to report serious food-safety concerns through a system that records and follows up complaints. Ninth, use technology intelligently. Artificial intelligence, sensors and digital systems can monitor temperature, hygiene schedules, waste segregation and other safety parameters. Tenth, think beyond the kitchen. If customers block footpaths, roads or emergency entrances, restaurants should help manage the situation. A successful restaurant should not become a problem for its neighbourhood. Finally, the Safe Food Oath. Can Maharashtra’s food industry voluntarily pledge that no known unsafe substance will knowingly be used in food? The proposed oath could state: “We pledge that we shall not knowingly use any carcinogenic, teratogenic, hepatotoxic, nephrotoxic or allergenic substance as a colouring agent, flavour or taste enhancer, adulterant, sweetener, or preservative or for any other food-processing purpose. We shall use only legally permitted and scientifically evaluated ingredients and additives and maintain transparency and accountability in the preparation and serving of food.” This is not a call to ban every chemical or synthetic food additive. Many are legally permitted after safety evaluation. The point is simple: unsafe substances should never be shortcuts for making food cheaper, brighter, sweeter or more attractive. Civic Food Industry Award Maharashtra could take the idea further by inviting the food and hospitality industry to adopt an 11-point Civic Food Industry Charter. Those meeting the standards could be independently assessed and recognised through a Maharashtra Civic Food Industry Award. The award would ask not only, “How good is your food?” But also, how much food did you save? How much plastic did you eliminate? How safely do you manage your kitchen? What happens to your food waste? Are your ingredients safe? Do you respect the neighbourhood? That would give “hospitality” a deeper meaning. Maharashtra has the institutions, entrepreneurs, technology and, most importantly, a food industry large enough to make a difference. The government can make regulations. Citizens can demand better standards. But the food industry can lead by choice. So the question before Maharashtra’s hotels, restaurants, caterers and food businesses is simple: Are you ready to accept the challenge — not just to serve citizens, but to take responsibility for them? (Deshmukh is a forensics scientist. Mathkari is co-founder, Civic Engineering Foundation.)

Robert Duvall: The Screen’s ‘Quiet American’ of Unshowy Greatness

Robert Duvall (1931-2026)
Robert Duvall (1931-2026)

Robert Duvall, who has died aged 95, was one of the last great craftsmen of American cinema. A man of many faces, he was, like his contemporary Gene Hackman, an ‘actor’s actor’ in every sense of the term.


Duvall was admired not for volatility, glamour or visible virtuosity, but for something rarer and harder to teach - an instinct for truth. With absolute integrity to his craft, Duvall inhabited his roles in his long and varied six-decade career.


His greatest performances never saw him announce his brilliance – although Duvall could be volatile and edgy when the role demanded it; rather, he let his brilliance accumulate throughout the film, often in his pregnant silences. Often, it was only by the end of a scene - or sometimes only at the end of a film - you realised you had been watching a master at work.


Born on January 5, 1931, in San Diego, California, Duvall came of age at a time when American acting was undergoing a quiet revolution. He trained at the Neighborhood Playhouse in New York under Sanford Meisner, absorbing a discipline that prized listening over performing, and behaviour over effect.


While Gregory Peck, of course, is inseparable from ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ (1962), Duvall’s wordless film debut – where he gives an almost spectral performance as ‘Boo Radley’ is no less memorable. Emerging hesitantly from the shadows at the film’s end, he embodied gentleness, fear, and moral grace. It was a performance built almost entirely from stillness, giving us a clue to the brilliant craftsman of the future.


He appeared in several iconic films of the 1960s, giving memorable and highly regarded performances that left a deep impression. He went on to face big John Wayne in ‘True Grit’ (1969) while appearing in George Lucas’s austere dystopian debut ‘THX 1138’ (1971) - a product of late-1960s countercultural anxieties about surveillance, conformity and technological control. Even then, Duvall gravitated towards material that challenged form and expectation.


He came into his own in the 1970s - the last great decade of American filmmaking. Classed with contemporaries like Gene Hackman, his close friend James Caan, Al Pacino, Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro, Duvall was part of a generation that displaced the old studio-star system with something rawer and more inward-looking.


Duvall’s most famous roles came in his collaborations with Francis Ford Coppola, who first cast him alongside James Caan in the wonderful 'The Rain People' (1969). An early indicator of Coppola’s prodigious talents, the film was also a fine showcase for Duvall and Caan


This collaboration reached its apotheosis with ‘The Godfather.’ Based on Mario Puzo’s 1969 bestseller, the film, made under pressure-cooker condition, saw Coppola, Duvall and Caan - along with Pacino - rise to dizzying heights while Marlon Brando, after a decade-long slump, made a grand Oscar-winning comeback.


As the lawyer Tom Hagen, the adopted son of Don Vito Corleone (Brando) and the family’s consigliere, Duvall was the moral centre of cinema’s most famous gangland saga. As against the flashier, more operatic turns of Brando, Pacino, Caan and later de Niro, Duvall shaded his role with a rationality, an intelligence and a quiet sadness, making him indispensable to the saga’s emotional architecture. He reprised the role in ‘The Godfather, Part II’ (1974) - one of the rare sequels to equal and arguably surpass its predecessor.


Duvall’s versatility was staggering, and he essayed not just contemporary American ‘urban’ roles but ranged across genres, from period pieces to crime dramas to Westerns.


Unlike contemporaries such as Pacino or Jack Nicholson, he refused to be straightjacketed into contemporary urban roles.


In the ‘The Seven-Per-Cent Solution’ (1976), he played a warm Dr Watson opposite Nicol Williamson’s manic Sherlock Holmes in an endearingly eccentric film that starred Alan Arkin as Sigmund Freud and Laurence Olivier as Professor Moriarty – Holmes’ arch-nemesis.


That same year, Duvall starred in ‘The Eagle Has Landed,’ which saw him as a German colonel cooking up an elaborate plot to kidnap Winston Churchill. Based on Jack Higgins’ fanciful WW2 adventure, Duvall gave a solid performance, playing alongside stalwarts Michael Caine and Donald Sutherland.


His powerful presence elevated several uneven but intriguing films. In ‘Joe Kidd’ (1972), he played a ruthless land baron opposite Clint Eastwood’s minimalist anti-hero, embodying the corporate villainy that had begun to replace old frontier lawlessness. In the revisionist Western, ‘The Great Northfield Minnesota Raid’ (also 1972), Duvall’s exuberant performance as ‘Cole Younger’ captured the chaotic energy of a genre in transition. In Sam Peckinpah’s flawed but fascinating ‘The Killer Elite’ (1975), Duvall locked horns once again with Caan in a Cold War thriller marked by paranoia and betrayal.


Two performances in the 1970s reveal the full moral bandwidth of Duvall’s acting. ‘Tomorrow’ (1972) and ‘Apocalypse Now (1979) - films that could not be more different in scale, tone or ambition. In ‘Tomorrow,’ adapted from a William Faulkner novella, Duvall, in an unforgettably austere performance, carried the entire film through voice and presence alone while in ‘Apocalypse Now,’ Francis Coppola’s hallucinatory Vietnam epic that transposed Conrad’s ‘Heart of Darkness,’ he delivered one of cinema’s most quoted lines – “I love the smell of napalm in the morning.” As Lt. Col. Bill Kilgore, Duvall’s brilliantly scary performance encapsulated the madness of Vietnam.


His scene-stealing ability, no matter what the size of the role, was in full display in the multiple Oscar-winning ‘Network’ (1976) – Sidney Lumet’s febrile and black media satire that seems all too real today. Duvall was explosive as the television executive Frank Hackett, more than holding his own against the supreme performances of Peter Finch, William Holden and Faye Dunaway.


Duvall’s long-overdue Oscar came with ‘Tender Mercies’ (1983) - a quiet, spiritual drama rooted in American country music traditions. As Mac Sledge, a broken-down singer seeking redemption, Duvall gave a performance of extraordinary humility.


Though celebrated for restraint, Duvall could be edgy when required, as in Denis Hopper’s crime-police procedural ‘Colors’ (1988) where he played a veteran Los Angeles cop hardened by gang warfare and institutional cynicism and in ‘Falling Down’ (1993), where Duvall anchored the film’s moral universe as a near-retirement Los Angeles police sergeant, his quiet professionalism and lived-in decency exposing Michael Douglas’s meltdown in a film that was an early cinematic reckoning with white male grievance.


Two of Duvall’s most audacious performances came in films he effectively carried on his own shoulders, earning him Best Actor Oscar nominations while revealing his penchant for creative risk-taking. In ‘The Great Santini’ (1979), adapted from Pat Conroy’s novel, Duvall played a tyrannical Marine Corps fighter pilot whose corrosive authority poisons his family life. Set against the rigid masculinity of Cold War-era military culture, Duvall’s ‘Bull Meechum’ was terrifying not because he was a monster, but because he was recognisably human - charismatic, disciplined, and emotionally illiterate. It was one of the rare portrayals of authoritarian fatherhood that neither excused nor sensationalised its damage.


Nearly two decades later, the 66-year-old Duvall delivered an even more remarkable performance with ‘The Apostle’ (1997), a film he wrote and directed as well. As Sonny Dewey, a disgraced Pentecostal preacher reinventing himself as ‘The Apostle E.F.,’ Duvall’s performance - rambling, impassioned, funny and frightening by turns – perfectly captured the uneasy overlap between spiritual conviction and moral blindness.


Unlike his contemporaries, Duvall turned in quality performances even in his 70s and well into his 80s, receiving Best Supporting Oscar nominations for ‘A Civil Action’ (1998) and ‘The Judge’ (2014) at the age of 84.


His late career turn is Westerns were no less astonishing. In 2003’s ‘Open Range,’ directed by and co-starring Kevin Costner, Duvall played Boss Spearman, an ageing free-grazier whose moral code is as worn as his saddle. It was a performance of immense gravity, shorn of any romanticism. Likewise, his celebrated turn as the cattle baron ‘Gus’ McCrae in the stupendous miniseries ‘Lonesome Dove’ (1989), was loquacious and humorous on the surface, but beneath it lay an acute awareness of time, decay and consequence.


It was an apposite summation of Robert Duvall’s varied screen roles. From ‘The Godfather’ to ‘Open Range,’ Duvall never played the myth. He played the man who had survived it.

Comments


bottom of page