top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law...

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law within the framework of safeguarding India’s pluralistic and democratic character. The AIMPLB leaders said they are soliciting support of people, intellectuals, activists, social and religious organisations who value justice, democracy, peace and the Constitution, to strengthen constitutional supremacy, the rule of law, justice and equality, religious freedom, social harmony and national unity. Around 100 progressive Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals, activists, organisations and supporters have warned that what the AIMPLB presents as a defence of constitutional rights, religious freedom and Muslim identity "could deepen divisions, and may provide political ammunition to right-wing forces". The progressive have accused AIMPLB of selectively invoking Art. 25-30 of the Constitution related to Religious Freedom, while ignoring that these rights are explicitly subject to public order, morality, and health. Moreover, they conveniently bypass Articles 14 and 15, which guarantee equality before the law and prohibit sex or religion-based discrimination. “Following the 2024 Lok Sabha elections where civil society and opposition parties rallied under 'Save the Constitution', the AIMPLB's campaign inadvertently gave the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Sangh Parivar a platform to posture as defenders of constitutional norms. Ahead of crucial state assembly elections, this campaign reinforces false narratives and fuels propaganda that Indian Muslims reject the law of the land,” said the intellectuals. They pointed out how the so-called ‘God-given Shariat Law’ in India is nothing but man-made personal laws and ‘male interpreted patriarchal interpretations’, defended by the AIMPLB. In its September 2016 Supreme Court affidavit in the Triple Talaq case (Sayara Bano v/s. Union of India), the AIMPLB’s affidavit claimed divorce rights belong primarily to husbands because men allegedly possess ‘greater power of decision-making’ and ‘control emotions’. It even argued that without a quick separation option, a husband ‘may resort to illegal, criminal ways of murdering or burning her alive’ - a disturbing rationalization of domestic violence. Claiming these laws are divine, the AIMPLB admitted that “India is a patriarchal society, and therefore personal laws of all communities are aligned with the patriarchal notion...” The progressives countered that Muslim-majority nations globally including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Tunisia and Morocco have codified and reformed personal laws to protect women's rights. “Millions of Muslims live in secular democratic nations with uniform family codes without putting ‘Islam in danger’. The Muslim community’s current legal predicament in India is the direct result of the AIMPLB and conservative leaders failing to proactively reform and codify Muslim Personal Law,” said the progressives sharply. They said that genuine family law reform must guarantee Muslim women equal rights regarding minimum marriage age, abolition of polygamy, mutual divorce, equal inheritance, child custody, adoption, and a ban on female genital mutilation and halala. While secular political parties rarely support the rights of Muslim women, the BJP and the Hindu Right wing do so with an obvious motive: ‘communal polarization’, said the progressives. “The sangh parivar sheds crocodile tears for Muslim women while ignoring relentless hate speech (Love Jihad, Land Jihad…) and hate crimes like mob lynching, bulldozing homes, demolishing mosques or economic boycotts, with chants of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ to intimidate and strike fear. This accompanies state actions targeting Muslims: Waqf Amendment Act, draconian anti-conversion laws, and a weaponised SIR (Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls) to disenfranchise vast sections of the electorate,” they averred. The progressives have sought the active involvement of all enlightened forces, civil society organisations and secular political parties to ensure that the demand for a gender-just, religion-neutral Uniform Civil Code is rooted in equality and human rights, rather than weaponized for communal division. Among the signatories to the appeal are: Naseeruddin Shah, Amol Palekar, Zeenat Shaukat Ali, Anand Patwardhan, Sultan Shaheen, Teesta Setalvad, Ram Puniyani, Tushar Gandhi, Mallika Sarabhai, Ratna Pathak, Feroze Mithiborwala, Anita Cheria, Zakia Soman, Jyothi Yedulla, Noorjehan S. Niaz, Madhu Bhaduri, et al.

SECTOR 36 – Could Have Been Stronger

Oct 7, 2024
3 min read

Updated: Oct 22, 2024

SECTOR 36

Aditya Nimbalkar makes his directorial debut with a very challenging subject. Sector 36 is sandwiched somewhere between a psychological thriller and a police thriller. The challenge is further sharpened by the fact that the film is an adaptation of the brutal Nithari killings in Noida in 2005 when 36 small children from a neighbouring slum were lured to the house of a businessman and he, along with his sociopath servant, would not only slaughter the kids to death but would also cook them on a specially made oven and eat their flesh. The tragic outcome of the final verdict in the case was that both the rich businessman and his servant were acquitted of all the crimes for lack of proper evidence! Or was it because the kids came from the slums from families who lived below the poverty line and had no clue how to get the killers sentenced for life or to death? No one knows and now, no one ever will.

The local police inspector Ram Charan Pandey (Deepak Dobriyal) takes charge of the investigation, not really interested in trying to catch the killer/s because, like his colleagues in the force –is disinterested and interested only in commanding his juniors to remind them who is boss. The film does not acquire the definition of a police thriller till we are half-way through the killings of slum kids who go missing and never come back. But he pulls up his socks when, during a Ram Leela jatra in the locality where he is perhaps portraying Ravana, he witnesses his little daughter being carried away by a masked man. Pandey gives hot chase but the killer runs free. Later, the kid is rescued and brought to her mother.

Prem (Vikrant Massey) is a servant at the home of Balbir Bassi (Akash Khurana), a rich businessman with shady deals and powerful enough to wrap DCP Rastogi (Darshan Jariwalla) round his fat little finger. Prem is a psychopath who is full of so much confidence that he quite plainly narrates his entire series of killings of small children, chopping their bodies, allowing the blood to flow and then, reports that he cooked and consumed them as his abusive uncle had taught him the taste of human flesh enough for him to get addicted.

The psychological tensions come across in scenes of the killings followed by suggestions that Prem is cooking and consuming them, gruesome enough for the lay viewer to take this for a horror film with so much blood, so many pictures of missing children stuck on the walls of the slum, the policeman cringing while crushing a cockroach with his shoe but doing it nevertheless and finally, building up everything to lead to a sad and unexpected anti-climax.

Sector 36 disproves the theory that the whole is more than the sum of its parts because in this film, with an ending that does not justify the build-up is quite disappointing. Vikrant Massey’s nonchalant approach to his killings, his kidnapping of the slum kids with chocolates, defines him as the most cold-blooded and pathological serial killer one has seen in recent times. But the tragic back story of the sexual abuse by an uncle weakens his villainy. The young sex worker who is killed and buried in some garden is another bright spot in all that blood and gore.

Deepak Dobriyal, underutilised, is understated and evolving from beginning to end till he goes missing. Akash Khurana and Darshan Jariwalla are as good as they always are. The editing is sharp, jet-paced and the cinematography captures the narrow bylanes of Delhi, the Ram Leela performance-to-be and the spacious interiors of Bassi’s palatial home standing in contrast to the place where Prem does his killings offers a good contrast but also adds to the confusion about the location where the heinous crimes are actually committed. The music is quite effective but it was not really needed.

Sector 36 is a sharp, well-etched, character-driven story where the police thriller and the psychological thriller come together to make for an unhappy marriage.

(The writer is a veteran journalist based in Kolkata. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page