top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

Self-imposed Celibacy

Updated: Dec 23, 2024

Self-imposed Celibacy

These are not the celebrities ostentatiously delaying marriage, nor are they couples in live-in relationships, priests or ascetics. Instead, they are men and women who have consciously chosen to stay single, rejecting the idea of marrying a farmer or a man earning less than their salaried counterparts.


In rural Maharashtra, a generation of men and women in their 40s is opting to remain unmarried, challenging long-held traditions that prioritize early marriage. This trend, particularly noticeable in the last decade, has escalated in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Once restrictions were lifted, mass weddings took place—but they were largely for the working class. This shift has ignited discussions about how careers, social expectations, and changing attitudes are reshaping marriage in these communities.


At the heart of this shift is 85-year-old Ratnakar Pagare, a veteran community organizer from Sangamner. Through his Vadhu-Var Suchak Mandal, which connects educated professionals, he has witnessed many women, particularly from the tech sector, reject marriage proposals from farmers, despite their parents’ desire for a rural, land-rich life. For these women, the allure of a city-based career far outweighs the appeal of rural living.


Women raised in urban areas are increasingly rejecting the prospect of farm life, despite its potential for significant financial returns. Interestingly, it is often the mothers of these women who are the real deterrents, discouraging their daughters from marrying farmers, fearing that rural life would hinder their daughters’ career ambitions.


This issue goes beyond individual preferences and speaks to deeper societal shifts. An anonymous political leader from the region points to a worrying trend: in some communities, nearly 98 percent of families are fixated on securing an heir to their property, but the new generation of educated women is increasingly uninterested in this traditional expectation. They are prioritizing their careers over family life, even if it means foregoing marriage.


The allure of urban life, with its promise of career stability and high-paying jobs, has only intensified this shift. The relative financial security of city-based jobs—often tied to the IT sector—has further discouraged rural men and women from considering marriage. For these urban dwellers, the prospect of returning to their ancestral land seems less appealing.


The rapid pace of urban development has contributed to a disconnect from rural life. This growing urbanization has made village life seem less desirable while the constant migration to cities and, increasingly, abroad, offers an escape from what many see as a stagnant rural economy.


But while urban life offers a degree of financial assurance, it is not without its emotional toll. Dr. Neha Kode, a psychologist from Nashik, warns that the decision to remain unmarried can result in feelings of inferiority and depression, particularly for men. In rural areas, where family and community often define an individual’s identity, the absence of marriage can lead to stigma, and in some cases, suicidal thoughts. She argues that the emotional impact of this societal shift deserves attention and calls for a broader debate in Maharashtra’s Legislative Assembly.


As the desire for professional success and financial stability continues to shape the lives of rural women in Maharashtra, the question remains: will the institution of marriage ever return to its traditional form, or is this a permanent transformation in the way people approach family life in India? The generational divide is clear, and its implications are only beginning to unfold. In rural Maharashtra, it seems, the future of marriage may no longer be shaped by tradition, but by the choices of a new, career-focused generation.

(The author is a senior journalist. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page