top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

High-stakes chess beneath the surface

BJP Candidates coming out after filing their nomination for the upcoming Legislative Council Polls from Vidhan Bhavan in Mumbai on Thursday. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Typically, when a ruling coalition enjoys a formidable and comfortable majority, elections to the Rajya Sabha and the State Legislative Council are quiet, predictable affairs. They are often viewed as mere formalities, rarely capturing the public imagination or dominating front-page headlines. Historically, these indirect...

High-stakes chess beneath the surface

BJP Candidates coming out after filing their nomination for the upcoming Legislative Council Polls from Vidhan Bhavan in Mumbai on Thursday. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Typically, when a ruling coalition enjoys a formidable and comfortable majority, elections to the Rajya Sabha and the State Legislative Council are quiet, predictable affairs. They are often viewed as mere formalities, rarely capturing the public imagination or dominating front-page headlines. Historically, these indirect elections only become newsworthy under specific conditions: either the ruling coalition is plagued by internal fissures, or the opposition is too fragmented to put up a united front. In Maharashtra, however, the political landscape remains highly volatile. Recently, the Rajya Sabha elections became the center of intense media scrutiny, and over the past week, the Legislative Council polls followed suit. Although all ten candidates—nine from the ruling alliance and one from the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—are now set to be elected unopposed, the intricate backroom maneuvers that led to this truce kept the state’s political circles buzzing. Interestingly, the reason for this heightened news value can be traced to both a subtle tug-of-war within the ruling combine and a visibly weakened opposition. Shifting Strategy The maneuvering within the opposition ranks has been particularly telling. A major focal point of the election buildup was the anticipated candidacy of Shiv Sena (UBT) Chief Uddhav Thackeray. After generating considerable hype and speculation about a potential return to the legislature, Thackeray ultimately chose to withdraw from the electoral fray. This sudden pullback forced a rapid recalibration within the MVA. Initially, the Congress party had adopted an aggressive posture, declaring its intention to field a candidate if Thackeray decided against contesting. However, following closed-door deliberations with Shiv Sena (UBT) leadership, the Congress quietly backed down. Why the state Congress leadership so readily acquiesced to this sudden change in strategy, sacrificing a potential seat, remains a mystery and a subject of intense debate among political observers. On the other side of the aisle, the ruling Mahayuti coalition maximized this electoral opportunity to consolidate its political base, reward loyalists, and balance complex regional equations. The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) strategically paved the way for the political rehabilitation of former Congress legislator Zishan Siddique by nominating him to the Legislative Council. This calculated move introduces a prominent new Muslim face for the party, likely intended to fill the leadership vacuum in Mumbai left by veteran leader Nawab Malik. Meanwhile, Chief Minister Eknath Shinde used his nominations to send a definitive message about the premium he places on loyalty. By securing another term for Dr. Neelam Gorhe, Shinde demonstrated that those who stood by his faction would be adequately rewarded. Furthermore, by bringing Vidarbha strongman Bachchu Kadu into the fold, Shinde has attempted to anchor his party’s future and expand its footprint in a region predominantly controlled by his senior alliance partner, the BJP. The Bharatiya Janata Party, playing its characteristic long game, meticulously ensured that its list of six candidates struck the perfect organizational, social, and political balance. Battle for LOP Despite these broader alliance strategies, the most consequential nomination in this electoral cycle is arguably that of Ambadas Danve. Barely six months after completing his tenure in the Upper House and stepping down from the prestigious post of Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Council, Danve has been nominated once again by the Shiv Sena (UBT). With his return to the house, there is a strong possibility that he will reclaim his former post. This specific development highlights a much deeper crisis within the Congress. Following Danve’s brief retirement, the Congress had naturally emerged as the largest opposition party in the Upper House. This mathematical advantage theoretically paved the way for their Kolhapur strongman, Satej “Banti” Patil, to lay claim to the Leader of the Opposition’s chair. However, the sudden defection of Congress MLC Pradnya Satav, who switched loyalties to the BJP, severely dented the party’s numbers. Her departure brought the Congress’s strength in the house just below that of the Shiv Sena (UBT). Stripped of its numerical superiority overnight, the Congress was relegated to being a mute spectator, unable to assert its rightful claim. Internal Dissent This series of tactical defeats has triggered palpable frustration within the Congress’s state unit. One senior Congress leader, speaking on the condition of anonymity, expressed deep disappointment with the state leadership’s inability to protect the party’s interests. “Everyone has personal political ambitions, but leaders must learn the ways to collectively move ahead and strategize,” the leader remarked, attributing the party’s current stagnation in Maharashtra to this lack of cohesive vision. In short, these Legislative Council elections have delivered one message loud and clear: even when everything appears calm and stable on the surface, the relentless machinery of politics continues to churn behind the scenes. No political player in Maharashtra can afford to rest assured or sit idle under the illusion that there are no major state elections until 2029.

Sexual Abuse, Silence and the Male Child

India’s hidden crisis of abused boys has been sustained by stigma and toxic masculinity, resulting in victims being unheard and perpetrators going unchallenged.

“Sexual Abuse” is a term which is both by direct implication and by suggestion, refers to the girl child. So, the idea of a little boy being sexually abused when he doesn't even understand the words “sexual” and “abuse” is not only never questioned by anyone in authority but not believed either. In some tragic cases, that small boy grows up to become a sexual abuser himself. A little boy of three, carried by his mother in a crowded bus one day, was taken from his mother by a male co-passenger who kindly took the little boy on his lap. But though the little boy could not quite understand what was happening, he felt uneasy and suffered discomfort. With mixed feelings of guilt and shame, he could not even look at his mother. The feeling of guilt and shame was so deep that till today, as an adult, he has never been able to share his problem with anyone, including his parents, male friends or colleagues of either sex.


A close relative, male, had raped his six-seven-year-old nephew while bathing him in the bathroom. This act went on for months at a stretch because the boy did not have the guts to complain. When he finally gathered the courage to complain to his mother, she paid a deaf ear and did not take action. This small boy went on being abused for eleven long years without reprieve of any kind. In one of the Satyameva Jayate shows in 2012, produced and anchored by Amir Khan, Harish Iyer, a young man who headed a LGBTQ+ NGO, confessed, “I never approached any male member of my NGO. I felt everyone could treat me the same way I was forced to by other boys and men. During that crucial period, the only companion who shared my pain and my tears was my dear, four-legged friend, my pet dog.”


Harrowing Scars

Dozens of small boys, adolescents and juveniles have been victims of sexual abuse. Till today, most of them carry the harrowing scars on their bodies and minds. Forget about taking their complaints to the police, they did not dare confide in their parents because most of them suffered from feelings of deep guilt without understanding why. Some victims kept the painful secret to themselves as they were scared of public reaction and of threatening the position of the family if the word went out.


A Study in 2007 conducted by the Central Ministry for Women and Child Welfare reported that in India, 52.94% boys and 47% girls have been victims of child abuse. But complaints about abuse of boys have been negligible. But POCSO applies to children of either sex. To find out why there are so few complaints filed against male victims of child sexual abuse, from 2024 onwards, Prajak, a NGO committed to child rights interviewed 22 male victims of sexual abuse. The survey discovered that the roots of male sexual abuse go deep.


Deep Purakayastha, who heads the NGO observers that in many cases, this begins with slighting the boy going on to harassment ending in sexual abuse. This slighting can be for flimsy reasons such as a boy showing no interest in outdoor sports, a boy being fair-skinned, a boy with a soft, cuddly body, an introverted male child, a boy more inclined to the arts like music, singing and dancing, a boy finding girls friendlier than boys or simply wearing glasses can trigger feelings of slighting, verbal insults, harassment and then sexual abuse.


Relentless Abuse

Boys in Borstal school where boy prisoners are kept imprisoned during trial, are sexually abused by adult male prisoners and senior boy inmates and no one turns a hair. They are teased with derogatory terms like “hijida” (eunuch) or “didi” or “girlish” and then graduates to great humiliation, insult and abuse. This can come from classmates to a cousin who lives with the family. Complaints to parents or teachers bring reactions like “settle it among yourselves” or “adjust”. Even teachers are reported telling the victim, “This country is not for boys like you so you better settle elsewhere.” But the boy might not be gay at all.


The abuser is such a familiar figure for the abused that it takes considerable time for the victim to ‘catch’ on. It could be the tabla player who accompanied the boy’s mother in music rehearsals. It could be a member of the police force or a male colleague of the mother or father, or, a distant uncle, or the neighbouring shopkeeper. So, the victim shies away from taking the complaint to his parents because either parents will refuse to believe them or will put the blame on them and keep the offender free of suspicion and accusation.


Purkayastha says that often, this abuse continues even when the victim passes out of school and steps into college. “Some of the boy victims confessed that their self-respect, destroyed by the continuous abuse, might have remained intact had they not been victimized for so long and so many times,” he observes.


One gay member of the 22 survey subjects complained that when he was small, a neighbourhood dada would fondle him incorrectly and threatened him with “this is our secret and if you let it out, I will tell your parents of your other secrets they know nothing about.” This boy confessed that constant abuse and its secrecy for a long time, afraid of confessing this to anyone had turned him to an abuser himself! Another victim said that he felt that this was perhaps a natural process of growing up and so, learnt to accept it though with guilt over time. “My life turned into a blind lane without an exit door. I understood child abuse was a terrible crime only when I turned into an adult but by then, it was too late.”


This calls for loud alarm bells for parents, teachers, educators and even the police to keep their mental and social antenna sharp and try to recognize any sign of behavioural changes in small boys who suddenly turn quiet and scared. They need to treat victims with empathy and understanding mainly, the mother which brings to the fore the question of women’s empowerment. Tulika Das, who heads the Child Rights Protection Commission in the East, says, “Parents ought to understand that just like the girl-child, boys can also be made victims of child abuse. So, more awareness should be the call of the day. The same concern must be felt by the police force through workshops organized in schools and NGOs across the country. POCSO should treat children irrespective of their gender. The main reason is that in our patriarchal society, no one even understands that boys are also likely to be as weak as girls are understood to be. Then and only then will the powers-that-be will become more aware of possible dangers to the male child.


(The writer is an award-winning film scholar who writes extensively on social issues. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page