top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s...

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s Secretariat at Rashtrapati Bhavan, replied to Sarda on forwarding his complaint to the Ministry of Home Affairs for necessary action. It further stated that action taken in the matter must be conveyed directly to Sarda. “It’s a pleasant surprise indeed that the President has taken serious note of the issue of insults to the National Flag at night-clubs, pubs, lounges, sports bars and other places all over the country. The blatant mishandling of the National Flag also violates the specially laid-down provisions of the Flag Code of India,” said Sarda. He pointed out that the Tricolor is a sacred symbol and not a ‘commercial prop’ for entertainment purposes to be used by artists without disregard for the rules. “There are multiple videos, reels or photos available on social media… It's painful to view how the National Flag is being grossly misused, disrespected and even displayed at late nights or early morning hours, flouting the rules,” Sarda said. The more worrisome aspect is that such transgressions are occurring openly, repeatedly and apparently without any apprehensions for the potential consequences. This indicates serious lapses in the enforcement and supervision, but such unchecked abuse could portend dangerous signals that national symbols can be ‘trivialized and traded for profits’. He urged the President to direct the issue of stringent written guidelines with circular to all such private or commercial outlets on mandatory compliance with the Flag Code of India, conduct special awareness drives, surprise checks on such venues and regular inspections to curb the misuse of the Tricolour. Flag Code of India, 2002 Perturbed over the “perceptible lack of awareness” not only among the masses but also governmental agencies with regard to the laws, practices and conventions for displaying the National Flag as per the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, the centre had brought out the detailed 25-page Flag Code of India, 2002. The Flag Code of India has minute guidelines on the display of the Tricolour, the happy occasions when it flies high, or the sad times when it is at half-mast, the privileged dignitaries who are entitled to display it on their vehicles, etc. Certain violations attract hefty fines and/or imprisonment till three years.

Shadows and Deception: The Third Man at 75

he Third Man at 75

A perfect film? Well, as near as one, and certainly the one film to rival any of Alfred Hitchcock’s greatest, director Carol Reed’s ‘The Third Man’ (1949) has only grown more iconic as it turns 75 this year.


Naïve American pulp fiction writer Holly Martins arrives in post-war Vienna to visit his friend Harry Lime, only to learn that Lime has supposedly died in an accident; unconvinced, Holly investigates and becomes ensnared in a web of deception, ultimately discovering that Lime is alive and deeply involved in black-market corruption.


Based on Graham Greene’s novella, the film’s enigmatic allure remains undiminished, with each ingredient essential to its lasting brilliance—from Robert Krasker’s vertiginous camera angles to Anton Karas’ haunting zither score, to the unforgettable performances of Joseph Cotten, Trevor Howard, and of course, Orson Welles as the elusive, amoral Harry Lime.


Krasker’s cinematography gives the film its eerie, surreal quality, casting Vienna as a crumbling metropolis teetering on the edge of chaos, its bombed-out streets and sewers becoming characters. The use of tilted, or ‘Dutch,’ angles distort our perspective, mirroring the moral confusion of post-war Europe where nothing is as it seems.


And then there is Karas’ zither. Its distinctive, lilting melody runs counter to the film’s stark visuals, as though it belongs in a different world entirely—one less dark, less haunted. Karas, an obscure Viennese musician, was discovered by Reed in a café and invited to score the film. His music, playful and melancholic, acts as a constant reminder that behind the tension and danger, life in Vienna goes on. The zither has a charm that pulls the viewer in, just as Harry Lime’s charm conceals his moral rot.


The performances elevate ‘The Third Man’ into a noir masterpiece, possibly the greatest British film ever. Cotten plays Holly Martins, a man adrift in a world he does not understand, with a mix of naivety and stubborn determination. Howard, as Major Calloway, embodies British stiff-upper-lip pragmatism, the foil to Holly’s idealism. But it is Orson Welles as Harry Lime who defines the film. His entrance, revealed in a doorway bathed in shadow, his face half-lit, is one of cinema’s most iconic moments.


Welles imbues Lime with a magnetic charisma, making it easy to see why Holly would be so devoted to him—until he learns the truth. The brilliance of his portrayal lies in the way he makes Lime both charming and despicable, a man whose very existence is a commentary on duplicity.


Set in a Vienna divided by Allied powers, the film reflects the paranoia and cynicism of the Cold War. Greene had been a British intelligence officer, and his portrayal of the moral murkiness of post-war Europe is rooted in firsthand knowledge. The story’s moral compass is shattered, just as the city of Vienna is divided into conflicting zones, each occupied by different world powers.


‘The Third Man’ is not merely a thriller but a meditation on moral ambiguity, and nowhere is this more apparent than in Welles’ legendary “cuckoo clock” speech. Perched high atop a Ferris wheel, Lime delivers a chilling justification for his black-market dealings in diluted penicillin, which has killed innocent children.


The speech, improvised by Welles, encapsulates Lime’s amorality. It is both a moment of intellectual grandeur and profound cynicism, one that makes the audience shudder as much as it dazzles. The dialogue is crackling right from the first frame as director Reed’s voice, tinged with sardonic humour, introduces the fractured world where Holly Martins soon finds himself, stumbling into a story far darker than the ones he pens, mirroring the viewer’s disorientation in a city where the lines between hero and villain blur in the shadows.


The film’s commentary on duplicity is all the more poignant given Greene’s connection to Kim Philby, his former boss in British intelligence. Philby, one of the infamous Cambridge Five, was later revealed to be a Soviet spy – ‘The Third Man’ - following the defections of Burgess and MacLean. Lime, like Philby, is a man who hides in plain sight, using charm and wit to mask a monstrous betrayal. Lime’s double life serves as a metaphor for the broader deceit of the Cold War era, where no one could be trusted, and loyalties were fluid.

Comments


bottom of page