top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 4:59:11 pm

Speculations of ‘Operation Tiger’

Mumbai: Recent disqualification of former Mumbai Mayor Vishakha Raut and senior corporator Deepak Sawant has sent shockwaves through the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), sparking speculation of a targeted municipal sequel to the Shiv Sena split. With a surge of election petitions now threatening dozens of elected representatives, whispers of a new form of calculated “Operation Tiger” are growing louder. Many suspect this is a strategic move to dismantle the Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray...

Speculations of ‘Operation Tiger’

Mumbai: Recent disqualification of former Mumbai Mayor Vishakha Raut and senior corporator Deepak Sawant has sent shockwaves through the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), sparking speculation of a targeted municipal sequel to the Shiv Sena split. With a surge of election petitions now threatening dozens of elected representatives, whispers of a new form of calculated “Operation Tiger” are growing louder. Many suspect this is a strategic move to dismantle the Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray (UBT) faction’s remaining stronghold in the civic body. Recent action against Raut and Sawant, whose Other Backward Classes (OBC) caste certificates were invalidated, reveals a broader vulnerability. According to BMC data, a staggering 79 election petitions are currently active against corporators across various parties. The charges primarily challenge the authenticity of caste verification certificates, but also include discrepancies in election affidavits concerning declared properties and income. While the sheer volume of petitions against the UBT camp is alarming, civic authorities note that filing a petition does not automatically result in disqualification. The process requires exhausting several legal and administrative steps. Even after a ruling by a caste scrutiny committee or judicial authority, the urban development department must formally issue a gazette notification before a seat is declared vacant. The timing of these petitions has fueled intense speculation. Against the backdrop of the ongoing Supreme Court hearings regarding the original Shiv Sena’s party name and election symbol, analysts suggest rival factions are leveraging these petitions. This municipal “Operation Tiger” appears designed to either legally disqualify embattled UBT members or pressure them into defection to avoid a public unseating. If these petitions lead to widespread disqualifications, the UBT faction risks losing its position as the largest opposition bloc, fundamentally altering the balance of power in Asia’s richest civic body. Election petitions against BMC corporators Political Party: Active Petitions Shiv Sena (UBT): 24 Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP): 18 Congress: 10 Shiv Sena (Shinde): 7 AIMIM: 7

She Knew In Three Lines

She knew within the first three lines. The message was polished, well-structured, and covered all the right points. But there was something about it the cadence, the phrasing, the absence of anything specific to their previous conversation that felt assembled rather than written. She read it twice. And then she made a quiet decision. Not a dramatic one. Not an angry one. Just a small, irreversible recalibration about who this person actually was and whether she wanted to continue the conversation. She never said a word. She simply moved on.


This is happening in boardrooms, inboxes and WhatsApp threads across every industry right now. Founders who have handed their voice entirely to an algorithm and called it efficiency. Responses that arrive with perfect grammar and zero personality. Follow-ups that reference nothing specific from the last conversation. Proposals that could have been written for anyone. And on the other side of every one of these interactions, a human being who notices even if they cannot immediately name what feels off that there is nobody home. AI is not the problem.


Let that be said clearly and without ambiguity. The founders who are using AI well as a thinking partner, a drafting tool, a research assistant are gaining a real and meaningful advantage. The problem is the founder who has outsourced their presence entirely. Who lets the algorithm speak on their behalf without adding a single word of their own. Who has confused efficiency with identity and does not yet understand that they are not the same thing. Here is the personal branding consequence that almost nobody is talking about honestly. When you let AI represent you without your voice running through it, you are not saving time. You are erasing yourself. The warmth, the specificity, the particular way you think and respond and engage — these are not decorative qualities.


They are the substance of your personal brand. They are what makes someone choose you over the equally qualified person they also met last week. Strip them out and you have not streamlined your communication.


You have quietly removed the reason someone would want to communicate with you specifically. Deals are being lost this way every single day. Not loudly. Not with feedback. Just quietly, in the moment someone reads a message and feels the complete absence of a person behind it.


They do not reply with "this feels AI generated." They simply stop replying. And the founder never connects the silence to the message that caused it. The most powerful personal brands I work with use AI the way a skilled writer uses an editor — to sharpen what is already there, never to replace what never showed up. They use it to organise their thinking, improve their structure, catch what they missed. And then they put themselves back into it. One specific observation. One genuine reaction.


One sentence that could only have come from someone who was actually present and paying attention. That one sentence is the difference between a message that converts and one that gets filed under "probably AI, move on." You cannot build a human brand through a machine. You can use the machine to build faster but the human must always be driving.


Always thinking. Always present enough in every message, every response, every interaction to remind the person on the other side that there is a real person here who sees them, values them and chose to engage with them specifically. That is not a workflow. That is a brand. If this landed somewhere uncomfortable, a Founder Brand Audit is a focused consultation call where we examine what your brand is currently communicating and where the human has quietly gone missing from it. This is a specific and intentional investment in yourself, not a free conversation.


Five slots open each week. Book your call here: https://www.calendly.com/divyaaadvaani/founder-brand-audit


(The author is a personal branding expert. She has clients from 14+ countries. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page