top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Song Binbin and the Killing That Defined Mao’s Cultural Revolution

Mao’s Cultural Revolution

On August 5, 1966, Bian Zhongyun, vice-principal of the Girl’s Secondary School affiliated to Beijing Normal University, was beaten to death by students. This was the first murder in Beijing by the Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution. Many more killings would follow during what became known as ‘Red August’, perhaps as many as two thousand in Beijing alone.


Feeling marginalised after the failure of the Great Leap Forward (1958-62) that had led to perhaps as many as 3o million deaths from famine, Mao Zedong considered that the revolution in China was floundering, that the Communist Party of China was shifting rightward, toward economic liberalisation, and that his enemies were too entrenched in the Party bureaucracy. In Mao’s opinion, the revolution had removed the capitalists and landlords from power, but their ideological influence still remained.


Mao set out to destroy the four olds – old customs, culture, habits, and ideas – and, because he had decided that the Party bureaucracy was controlled by his political adversaries, he looked outside of the Party for his ‘revolution within the revolution’, especially to students, stating that ‘education has to be revolutionised, and the phenomenon of the rule of our schools by bourgeois intellectuals must not go on anymore.’ And the students, heavily indoctrinated from birth by Party ideology, were only too happy to oblige, often in the most violent forms possible, calling themselves ‘Red Guards’.


But Bian Zhongyun had been the vice-principal of no ordinary school. The Girl’s Secondary School affiliated to Beijing Normal University was prestigious. Among its students were the daughters of many of the Party’s senior cadre, including: Liu Tingting, daughter of Liu Shaoqi; Deng Rong, daughter of Deng Xiaoping; and Song Binbin, daughter of Song Renqiong. Liu Shaoqi was at the time considered a possible successor to Mao, and Deng Xiaoping and Song Renqiong were two of the ‘Eight Immortals’, founder members of the People’s Republic of China.


Liu Tingting, Deng Rong, and Song Binbin had all become Red Guards at the school, their family connections making them very aware of the political winds of change, more so than the schoolteachers and administrators who were soon to be their victims, their standard attire a military uniform with sleeves and trouser legs rolled up and sporting a red armband. But it was Song Binbin who was soon to emerge into the public eye. She was but 19 at the time.


On August 18th 1966, there was a million-strong rally for the Red Guards held in Tiananmen Square. Mao arrived in military dress unlike many other senior Party figures who had to rush home to change. Song Binbin was invited to tie a red armband around Mao’s arm, the photograph of the event bringing her fame (later infamy), Mao’s acceptance of the armband electrifying the Red Guard movement, spurring it onward. Mao told her she should change her name from Binbin, meaning ‘refined and gentle’, to Yaowu, meaning ‘militant’ – his blessing, perhaps, for the epidemic of violence now spreading across China.


But the Cultural Revolution would not be kind to Song Binbin as with many others of the Party faithful. Her own father, Song Renqiong, would be purged from the Party in 1968, and she and her mother would be placed under house arrest.


Later she would be sent into the countryside. Song Binbin graduated in 1975, earned a doctorate from MIT in 1989, and became a US citizen. She returned to China in 2003 during debates about the Cultural Revolution, becoming the ‘face’ of the Red Guards in the documentary ‘Morning Sun,’ though only her silhouette appeared. She later defended herself, claiming naivety and emphasizing her opposition to violence, asserting her gentle nature true to her name, Binbin.


After the Cultural Revolution, in 1981, despite pleas for justice from her husband, Wang Jingyao, prosecuting authorities declined to investigate the murder of Bian Zhongyun any further – the names of those involved perhaps too sensitive to proceed.


In 2012, Song Binbin made a formal apology to Wang Jingyao, and once more in 2014 when she visited her old school, bowing before the bust of Bian Zhongyun. But she died of cancer at the age of 77 on 16th September of this year without confessing or naming names.


In her remarkable book of remembrance, Victims of the Cultural Revolution, Wang Youqin, offers up a tentative and tantalising explanation for Bian Zhongyun’s being the first murder in Beijing – apart, that is, from Mao’s general and violent invective against educators. Bian Zhongyun was quite the egalitarian, had initially blocked Liu Tingting’s entrance to the school through poor grades, and believed that the daughters of the elite should not monopolise leadership positions in student bodies. Perhaps the Cultural Revolution had given these daughters of the elite the chance to seize the power that they wanted, the excuse they needed to exact their horrific revenge. I think Mao would have been proud.


(The author is a novelist, retired investigator with an abiding passion for Chinese history)

Comments


bottom of page