top of page

By:

Prasad Dixit

11 October 2024 at 1:09:23 am

The Human Advantage in an Artificial Age

As artificial intelligence grows smarter and more efficient, the real battle may not be about machines surpassing humanity but about whether humans squander the qualities that still set them apart. With the recent news of a Chinese robot beating the human record in a half- marathon, there is renewed debate on how AI could outsmart human beings. Many experts see it as yet another proof of impending disaster as AI takes over most of the jobs in the years to come. This is not the first time when...

The Human Advantage in an Artificial Age

As artificial intelligence grows smarter and more efficient, the real battle may not be about machines surpassing humanity but about whether humans squander the qualities that still set them apart. With the recent news of a Chinese robot beating the human record in a half- marathon, there is renewed debate on how AI could outsmart human beings. Many experts see it as yet another proof of impending disaster as AI takes over most of the jobs in the years to come. This is not the first time when human civilization is facing a technological revolution that has the potential to impact society and economy in a profound manner. There is, however, a crucial difference with AI driven revolution that is often missed out. The first industrial revolution happened because steam engines were invented and it led to mechanization of production. It was followed by discovery of electrical energy and technologies to harness it for mass production. Next wave of evolution was led by computerization and automation in practically all the fields covering both offices and industrial shop floors through mainframes, personal computers, and programmable logic controllers. While all these leaps in technologies are very different in terms of the specific underlying inventions, they all have one thing in common. They were all invented to do things that were humanly impossible to do. One steam engine or electric motor could do the work that perhaps hundreds of humans would never be able to accomplish even with their collective muscle power. Automation of the manufacturing assembly line would deliver speed and accuracy that human beings would never be able to achieve. Beyond Human Technological advances in Telecommunication, for that matter, have simply expanded the range of 'hearing' and 'seeing' far beyond what human vocal chords, ears, and eyes could manage to do on their own. Computers, at its core, are essentially doing the math and calculations at a speed and accuracy that the human brain can never achieve. To add to that, machines using all these innovations in technology would work tirelessly without any fatigue for a duration that human beings would never be able to match. Although AI is yet another highly potent technological innovation, it is not as straightforward as the previous ones. It can absorb and synthesize huge amounts of data that the human brain perhaps cannot do. Ability of AI to answer any question reasonably well using all the global knowledge made available to it, summarize enormous amount of data and text quickly, quickly draw a complex picture based on instructions given verbally, predict a trend, recognize and highlight a specific face in a fraction of a second from millions of faces, write code based on simple English instructions, are all examples where the speed and accuracy of underlying computation is delivering what human being cannot match. However, there are several areas where human beings are trying to improve AI so that it can, some day, match or exceed capability that human beings themselves already have. Examples of this include the ability of AI to completely replace a human driver safely in all situations, understand full context or an intent behind a statement, carry out complex and well-coordinated mechanical activity in response to various unpredictable situations, react appropriately by correctly assessing the emotions at play, integrate generated code appropriately in the existing larger systems landscape, and so on. In such cases, AI is not exhibiting any capability that is humanly impossible to match. On the contrary, AI is trying to catch up with what humans can do easily. In other words, in these areas, AI is trying to become what humans already are. This very aspect separates AI driven technology revolution from all the previous ones. Direct Competition It is often said that AI and humans will co-exist in the future, and people will need to change their ways of working. It is obvious that AI is also going to directly compete with humans in many sectors. Equipment with an embedded chip on-board do compete with humans even today. A case in point is household equipment such as ‘intelligent’ washing machines and dish-washers where robots to do vacuum cleaning and floor mopping do compete with humans offering these services. A human household help can perform these activities far better than what a machine can do. However, given an affordable choice, an increasing number of households prefer machines over human maid services for a reason. Human household help may not always be punctual, sincere, honest, and reliable. But machines are. Uncontrolled emotions, anger, frustration, laziness, indiscipline, absenteeism do affect humans - but not AI driven machines (at least till the time AI itself acquires emotions of its own, and becomes self-aware some day). This aspect of comparison between AI and humans is likely to become far more prominent and consequential as AI driven machines and robots become more and more intelligent and thereby start competing far more effectively with human capability in many spheres. Competition is said to bring about improvement. Just as AI improves itself through continuous learning to mimic human behaviour and actions, human workforce also needs to improve itself by avoiding behavioural issues and inefficiencies referred to above. Otherwise, humans would lose the natural advantage that they still enjoy over AI, and which is likely to continue even in the foreseeable future. Employers or consumers in the labour-intensive service sector will accept AI driven machines and robots with all its known limitations if it turns out to be a better net-net deal in comparison to services offered by humans. This specific aspect has tremendous significance for India. Many Countries from the developed world do not have a young population with reasonably good IQ in required numbers. India, on the other hand, has it in abundance. One could compare it with abundant availability of Thorium or Sunlight in India as compared to the Western world. Consequently, unlike many Countries in the world that have a Uranium centric approach towards nuclear energy, India's approach needs to be centered around Thorium. India's strategy related to renewable, non-conventional, green energy needs to be based on solar power. Indian Context Strategies for adopting AI in the Indian context need to be similarly tailored for the Indian context. India needs to adopt AI in the areas where it clearly has an advantage over humans in terms of speed, throughput, ease of use, accuracy, and efficiency. However, the use of AI needs to be judiciously controlled in areas where AI is trying to catch up with the capabilities of the human mind and body. Several labour-intensive services such as drivers, caregivers for the elderly people, parcel delivery, security guards, maintenance and repair of various equipment, are all examples in that category. Educational policies and overall work culture in the Country needs to appreciate this reality. Just as AI experts are trying hard to 'teach' AI algorithms and improve them through supervised learning, another set of experts need to sensitize and teach humans on how to understand, appreciate, preserve, and further hone the significant natural advantage that they already have over AI. Despite all the technological breakthroughs in AI, in many areas, still, it is a battle that humans will lose only if they choose to. (The writer works in the Information Technology sector. Views personal.)

Tariffs, Terrorism and Treachery: How friends, foes and opportunists test India’s resolve

As our country turns 79, it faces an abrasive America and a perfidious Pakistan, and must balance external provocation with domestic political theatre.

The week before India’s 79th Independence Day has brought a reminder that geopolitics and domestic politics are both unkind to the complacent. The world’s third-largest economy is navigating a perfect storm: Washington is flirting with old habits by coquetting with Pakistan; Donald Trump has slapped a 50 per cent tariff on Indian goods; China is back in the diplomatic frame; and, at home, the opposition has discovered that manufacturing doubt is easier than manufacturing consent.


This cocktail of pressures comes just as India’s growth story looks more promising than it has in decades. That is precisely why the challenges loom large as the country has more to lose, and more to protect, than ever before.


Donald Trump recently slapped a punitive 50 per cent tariff on Indian goods. For India, now the world’s third-largest economy, the move is both an irritant and a test of strategic agility. New Delhi must navigate an America that has shifted from transactional under Trump 1.0 to transactional-with-attitude under Trump 2.0. Legally, this sits atop a 10 percent baseline tariff established by executive order and a fresh 25-point surcharge specifically on India this month, bringing the combined hit to around 50 per cent.


India must therefore prepare for a phase in which tariffs are used as leverage and terrorism is downplayed by the US in the name of ‘stability.’ The Modi government’s response will set the tone for India’s next decade: whether it allows itself to be boxed in by great-power games, or whether it leverages its market size, strategic geography and diplomatic clout to stay in control of its own trajectory.


The tariffs will likely sting, but they are not fatal. India has been here before in the early 1990s, when its economy was still fragile, Washington’s sanctions after its nuclear tests were far more crippling. Now, with a $4 trillion GDP, record forex reserves, and a booming services sector, India has more leverage.


Some in Delhi spy an opportunity. If American tariffs push China further out of the US market, nimble Indian manufacturers could grab market share if they can improve scale, quality and delivery times. Of course, those “ifs” remain large. Without structural reforms in logistics, energy pricing, and land acquisition, India’s manufacturers will struggle to capitalise on any vacuum left by China.


Even as tariff tensions brew with America, Delhi is making a pragmatic gesture towards Beijing. Narendra Modi is preparing to travel to China for the first time in seven years to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Tianjin at the end of this month. Alongside the diplomatic choreography will come a practical announcement: the resumption of direct passenger flights between the two countries, suspended since the pandemic and the deadly Galwan Valley clash in 2020.


Across the Atlantic, the UK is a rare bright spot. London and New Delhi signed their free-trade agreement last month. But the hard work begins now with ratification, phased implementation and ensuring that the rules-of-origin do not blunt the promised gains.


Energy security is trickier still. U.S. and European sanctions have tightened around Russia’s oil logistics, with more tankers and traders blacklisted and some cargoes to India diverted or delayed. Indian refiners are being nudged toward stricter compliance thresholds, complicating procurement and narrowing discounts that once padded margins


On the diplomatic front, the most visible irritant lies in America’s renewed indulgence of Pakistan. That Pakistan has once again turned to exporting terror was grimly underscored in the April 22 Pahalgam massacre of our civilians. Trump’s rhetorical soft spot for Pakistan, cultivated in the name of countering China in Afghanistan’s shadow, risks emboldening a state apparatus that treats terrorism as statecraft. Washington’s coyness towards Munir, reinforces the perception that Pakistan’s dangerous games will not incur serious penalties from the West.


The US State Department’s recent designation of the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and its Majeed Brigade wing as foreign terrorist organisations followed as soon as Pakistan’s army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir issued India with a threat of nuclear catastrophe on American soil.


Worse, the terrorist-designation exercise has the air of the old Washington playbook of ‘balancing’ India and Pakistan. That script was supposedly abandoned two decades ago, when America belatedly recognised that Pakistan’s military deep-state thrives on strategic rent-seeking and chronic instability.


To many in India, Trump’s repeated coquetting with Munir risks making India-US strategic ties politically toxic.


If India’s external environment is messy, its internal political stage is equally parlous. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Vote Chori’ campaign has accused the Election Commission of padding voter rolls with fake entries in Maharashtra and elsewhere. The so-called evidence has been not merely flimsy but downright false in several instances.


By attempting to paint the world’s largest democracy as a ‘rigged’ system, the Congress gives rhetorical ammunition to those who seek to undermine India’s credibility abroad.


The hypocrisy is brazen. When voter-roll increases were larger in 2004 and 2009, the Congress celebrated the results. And yet, a year after the 2024 Lok Sabha election, the Congress now mounts street protests, knowing the spectacle will dominate headlines and embolden its ecosystem.


In fact, India’s external challenges sometimes pale beside the insidious campaign against our government at home. Rahul Gandhi and the Congress Party, unable to best Narendra Modi at the ballot box, have settled for undermining India’s credibility abroad. Such rhetoric has not merely been confined to political slanging matches. A pliant intellectual and media ecosystem, along with a constellation of taxpayer-funded academics, have amplified every anti-India every barb into an international talking point. Stories have cherry-picked economic data, casting India’s strategic moves as blunders while treating its adversaries’ propaganda with the solemnity of fact.


Gandhi and his sycophants within the Congress appear determined to question India’s strength at every international inflection point, be it parroting Trump’s India is a “dead economy” jibe to creating a narrative akin to Pakistan’s during Operation Sindoor.


Gandhi’s remarks, amplified on foreign platforms, hand talking points to those eager to paint India as weak, fractious and unreliable. This is hardly the first time Congress leaders have sung from a foreign hymn sheet. Ahead of Independence Day, we regrettably have our country’s primary opposition party playing into the old colonial narrative that India was incapable of self-rule. The same habit of undermining the national position persists, only the masters have changed.


The task before Prime Minister Modi and the Indian government, therefore, is unenviable. But if history is any guide, then India will adapt. It has weathered the Nixon shock, the Clinton sanctions, the post-9/11 embrace of Pakistan and the 2008 financial crisis. Tariffs and terrorism, even in tandem, are unlikely to halt the rise of an economy whose fundamentals like demography, domestic demand and digitalisation remain robust. But India’s tenacity will have to be matched with tactical flexibility if it must outmatch its enemies from within and without.


Comments


bottom of page