The attempt on Sukhbir Singh Badal’s life at the Golden Temple is a chilling reminder of Punjab’s volatile interplay of religion, politics, and governance. The sight of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader, performing penance as a sewadar under the Akal Takht’s directive, was meant to symbolize accountability in politics. But the sanctity of his penance was shattered by a gunman’s brazen act, leaving Punjab grappling with a troubling resurgence of its past.
Predictably, the attack has snowballed into a political maelstrom, underscoring Punjab’s precarious security situation. The assailant, Narain Singh, reportedly linked to the notorious Khalistani group Babbar Khalsa, has a dark history. He was a key figure in the 2004 Burail jailbreak, which freed the assassins of former Chief Minister Beant Singh. That such a figure could approach one of Punjab’s most high-profile politicians at its holiest site speaks volumes about the state’s security challenges.
Compounding the issue are allegations involving police complicity, with CCTV footage purportedly showing a police officer shaking hands with the shooter. These claims have further muddied the waters, casting doubt over the credibility of law enforcement.
The SAD’s long tenure, punctuated by controversial decisions like pardoning Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh in 2007, alienated many among its core Sikh constituency. The Akal Takht’s rare public censure of Badal was a reflection of these strained ties.
Punjab’s current government, led by Bhagwant Mann and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), has painted the attack as a testament to its readiness and the quick action of the police. However, opposition parties like the BJP and Congress have seized on the incident to highlight the deteriorating law-and-order situation. SAD, predictably, has turned the tables, pointing fingers at the police and raising questions about the role of senior officials.
The Golden Temple has often found itself at the centre of Punjab’s turbulence. The attack on Badal brings back uncomfortable memories of Operation Bluestar in 1984 and the insurgency that followed, a period when Punjab teetered on the brink. Today, the state’s challenges are less overtly violent but no less insidious. Drug trafficking, unemployment, and an emboldened diaspora pushing separatist narratives all contribute to a precarious milieu.
The attack also raises broader questions about the role of religion in Punjab’s politics. The intertwining of faith and governance has long been a double-edged sword for the state. While religious institutions have often served as a source of moral authority, they have also been arenas for political contestation. The Akal Takht’s involvement in Badal’s penance is a case in point, reflecting the enduring influence of Sikh religious bodies in shaping Punjab’s political discourse.
For Badal, this incident might offer a strange sort of vindication—a reminder of the political capital he still holds as the leader of Punjab’s oldest party. Yet it also exposes his vulnerability and the long road ahead in regaining trust among voters. For Punjab, it serves as a wake-up call: security, governance, and political stability are all teetering, demanding urgent and coordinated attention.
While Badal escaped with his life, Punjab’s body politic has sustained yet another wound. Healing will require more than quick condemnations and political point-scoring; it demands a deep introspection into the state’s governance and its leaders’ accountability. The question is whether Punjab’s leaders are willing to rise to the occasion or whether the state will continue to grapple with the ghosts of its past.
Commentaires