top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 4:59:11 pm

BJP expels Amravati rebels

Mumbai: The Bharatiya Janata Party expelled three leaders from Amravati for six years and issued show-cause notices to over 100 corporators in Pune this week for defying party directives during the Maharashtra legislative council elections. The party took these disciplinary actions to neutralize internal rebellion against Mahayuti alliance candidates and enforce organizational rules by mandating written explanations from the Pune representatives within five days. The disciplinary action in...

BJP expels Amravati rebels

Mumbai: The Bharatiya Janata Party expelled three leaders from Amravati for six years and issued show-cause notices to over 100 corporators in Pune this week for defying party directives during the Maharashtra legislative council elections. The party took these disciplinary actions to neutralize internal rebellion against Mahayuti alliance candidates and enforce organizational rules by mandating written explanations from the Pune representatives within five days. The disciplinary action in Amravati stems from the seat-sharing arrangement of the ruling Mahayuti alliance. The Amravati Teachers constituency was allocated to the Chief Minister Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena, which fielded sitting legislator Kiran Sarnaik. Defying this arrangement, BJP leaders Sangita Shinde, Chandrashekhar Bhoyar, and Sumit Pawar filed independent nominations. This rebellion reportedly upset Chief Minister Shinde, prompting his faction to initiate maneuvers to support independent candidate Sachin Sanap against the BJP’s official nominee, Kaustubh Gawde, in the Pune Teachers constituency. Under pressure to salvage alliance unity, the BJP expelled its three Amravati rebels for a period of six years, thereby sending a message of solidarity to the Shiv Sena and attempting to halt retaliatory political moves in Pune. Simultaneously, the BJP faced mass absenteeism in its Pune stronghold. Over 100 corporators skipped the official campaign launch event for the party’s Pune division graduates and teacher’s constituency candidates. The gathering was presided over by BJP state president Ravindra Chavan and attended by Union Minister of State Murlidhar Mohol, state minister Chandrakant Patil, and Mayor Manjusha Nagpure. Noting the empty chairs, house leader Ganesh Bidkar personally verified the attendance in the hall. The party immediately served show-cause notices to the absent corporators, instructing them to submit a formal clarification within five days. The BJP has 119 elected and seven nominated corporators in the Pune Municipal Corporation, bringing its total strength to 126. A final decision on disciplinary measures will be taken after senior leaders review the submitted explanations. Beyond party discipline, the Amravati Teachers constituency election has drawn attention for a stark shift in campaign methods. Traditionally focused on direct communication with educators regarding their grievances, the election is now characterized by large vehicle convoys, modern campaign mechanisms, and widespread allegations of cash and Paithani saree distribution among voters. A formal complaint has already been registered in Achalpur regarding voter inducement. Despite the influx of money and political muscle, the core demands of the teaching community remain centered on the old pension scheme, grants for unaided schools, and pending salary issues.

Terror Has an Address Now

May 3, 2025
3 min read

Pahalgam is a brutal reminder that terrorism thrives not just on violence but on the world’s indifference.

The massacre of 27 innocent civilians in Pahalgam, Kashmir is a grim reminder that violent extremism respects no boundary, no creed and no norm of humanity. This was not merely an attack on civilians but an assault on the idea of civilised order. When terror strikes tourists on a peaceful journey, it exposes the moral bankruptcy of the extremists and the complacency of those who merely condemn without consequence.


Time and again, the global response to terrorism follows a weary ritual: swift condemnation, sombre diplomacy and then silence. What is needed now is not rhetoric but resolve. There can be no negotiation with those who traffic in violence as ideology. The outpouring of unity across India after the Pahalgam tragedy cutting across political, religious and social lines sent a clear signal that Bharat speaks with one voice against terrorism. The world would do well to echo it.


The idea that terrorism can be contained or compartmentalised is a dangerous illusion. Violence ignored is violence emboldened. The doctrine of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam - the world as one family - demands not only philosophical commitment but strategic coherence. Terrorism is not selective; it feeds on silence, on division and on international double standards.


India, with its syncretic heritage and pluralistic ethos, has long embraced tolerance. Yet it has also been among the foremost victims of cross-border terror. That Pakistan continues to serve as a sanctuary for violent extremists is no secret. The irony is painful: Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, whose own mother, Benazir Bhutto, was assassinated by militants, now lends rhetorical comfort to the very forces responsible for atrocities such as Pahalgam.


Indians remember standing in solidarity with Pakistan after the carnage in Peshawar and the murder of Sufi singers. But reciprocity remains elusive. Sectarian violence continues to claim lives in Pakistan. Shias, Ahmadis and other minorities live under constant threat. What Pakistan exports to the world, above all, is instability.


The international community must stop treating Pakistan’s duplicity as a diplomatic inconvenience. It must recognise that terror has metastasised into a global cancer, one that cannot be excised with half-measures or hollow statements. Human-rights organisations, too, must resist the temptation to remain silent when terror is unleashed against Indians. Silence, in such moments, is complicity.


If the world truly believes in peace, it must match India’s unity with its own. Pahalgam should not become just another headline. It should be the turning point in the fight against the global machinery of violent extremism.


The massacre is a chilling reminder that violent extremism continues to flourish with impunity. For decades, India has borne the brunt of cross-border terrorism - from the attack on its Parliament in 2001 to the carnage in Mumbai in 2008. Yet global responses have too often been confined to platitudes and perfunctory condemnations. It is high time that the international community acknowledge that terrorism in Kashmir is not a local grievance but a global threat.


Despite their grief, Indians have shown uncommon unity in the face of this violence. The aim of the terrorists, which is to sow communal discord and stifle Kashmir’s economic revival, is being countered with resolve. Tourism, a key pillar of Kashmir’s prosperity, must not be allowed to falter. With a direct train connecting the Valley to Kanyakumari in the south, India’s response should be to flood Kashmir with tourists, not fear.


The question, however, remains: what is the world doing to dismantle the infrastructure that enables such attacks? Pakistan, which gave sanctuary to Osama bin Laden and has long harboured extremist networks, remains a hub for jihadist ideology. It is time the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) reconsidered its indulgence. International funding routed through institutions such as the IMF should be scrutinised with far greater rigour. Too often, it props up a military-political elite while ordinary Pakistanis remain trapped between poverty and propaganda.


India, a land steeped in Sufi traditions and pluralism, has long advocated for a united global front against terrorism. Yet the world continues to view this scourge through the lens of narrow self-interest. The battle for Kashmir’s soul is not India’s alone but a litmus test of whether the international community truly believes in a peaceful, rules-based order. The blood spilled in Pahalgam must not be in vain.


(The author is an academician, columnist, historian and a strong voice on Gender and Human Rights.)

Comments


bottom of page