top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

Terror Has an Address Now

Pahalgam is a brutal reminder that terrorism thrives not just on violence but on the world’s indifference.

The massacre of 27 innocent civilians in Pahalgam, Kashmir is a grim reminder that violent extremism respects no boundary, no creed and no norm of humanity. This was not merely an attack on civilians but an assault on the idea of civilised order. When terror strikes tourists on a peaceful journey, it exposes the moral bankruptcy of the extremists and the complacency of those who merely condemn without consequence.


Time and again, the global response to terrorism follows a weary ritual: swift condemnation, sombre diplomacy and then silence. What is needed now is not rhetoric but resolve. There can be no negotiation with those who traffic in violence as ideology. The outpouring of unity across India after the Pahalgam tragedy cutting across political, religious and social lines sent a clear signal that Bharat speaks with one voice against terrorism. The world would do well to echo it.


The idea that terrorism can be contained or compartmentalised is a dangerous illusion. Violence ignored is violence emboldened. The doctrine of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam - the world as one family - demands not only philosophical commitment but strategic coherence. Terrorism is not selective; it feeds on silence, on division and on international double standards.


India, with its syncretic heritage and pluralistic ethos, has long embraced tolerance. Yet it has also been among the foremost victims of cross-border terror. That Pakistan continues to serve as a sanctuary for violent extremists is no secret. The irony is painful: Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, whose own mother, Benazir Bhutto, was assassinated by militants, now lends rhetorical comfort to the very forces responsible for atrocities such as Pahalgam.


Indians remember standing in solidarity with Pakistan after the carnage in Peshawar and the murder of Sufi singers. But reciprocity remains elusive. Sectarian violence continues to claim lives in Pakistan. Shias, Ahmadis and other minorities live under constant threat. What Pakistan exports to the world, above all, is instability.


The international community must stop treating Pakistan’s duplicity as a diplomatic inconvenience. It must recognise that terror has metastasised into a global cancer, one that cannot be excised with half-measures or hollow statements. Human-rights organisations, too, must resist the temptation to remain silent when terror is unleashed against Indians. Silence, in such moments, is complicity.


If the world truly believes in peace, it must match India’s unity with its own. Pahalgam should not become just another headline. It should be the turning point in the fight against the global machinery of violent extremism.


The massacre is a chilling reminder that violent extremism continues to flourish with impunity. For decades, India has borne the brunt of cross-border terrorism - from the attack on its Parliament in 2001 to the carnage in Mumbai in 2008. Yet global responses have too often been confined to platitudes and perfunctory condemnations. It is high time that the international community acknowledge that terrorism in Kashmir is not a local grievance but a global threat.


Despite their grief, Indians have shown uncommon unity in the face of this violence. The aim of the terrorists, which is to sow communal discord and stifle Kashmir’s economic revival, is being countered with resolve. Tourism, a key pillar of Kashmir’s prosperity, must not be allowed to falter. With a direct train connecting the Valley to Kanyakumari in the south, India’s response should be to flood Kashmir with tourists, not fear.


The question, however, remains: what is the world doing to dismantle the infrastructure that enables such attacks? Pakistan, which gave sanctuary to Osama bin Laden and has long harboured extremist networks, remains a hub for jihadist ideology. It is time the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) reconsidered its indulgence. International funding routed through institutions such as the IMF should be scrutinised with far greater rigour. Too often, it props up a military-political elite while ordinary Pakistanis remain trapped between poverty and propaganda.


India, a land steeped in Sufi traditions and pluralism, has long advocated for a united global front against terrorism. Yet the world continues to view this scourge through the lens of narrow self-interest. The battle for Kashmir’s soul is not India’s alone but a litmus test of whether the international community truly believes in a peaceful, rules-based order. The blood spilled in Pahalgam must not be in vain.


(The author is an academician, columnist, historian and a strong voice on Gender and Human Rights.)

Comments


bottom of page