top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Terror Hypocrisy

Canada’s decision to designate the Lawrence Bishnoi gang a “terrorist entity” under its Criminal Code might appear at first glance a long-overdue step toward safeguarding its own society. Bishnoi’s syndicate, implicated in murder, extortion, arms and narcotics trafficking and even cross-border assassinations, certainly fits the definition of a terrorist organisation. The move gives Ottawa the tools with which to freeze assets of the infamous gangster, bar entry to the gang’s members and prosecuting those who aid the gang.


But beneath the veneer of resolve lies a glaring hypocrisy. The Canadian government that now claims to be cracking down on violent actors has for years coddled and provided space to anti-India extremist groups, notably Khalistani separatists and their sympathisers as well as those linked to radical Islamist networks. Canada’s selective morality is dangerous.


The Bishnoi gang was already notorious within Canada. After the assassination of Punjabi singer Sidhu Moose Wala in May 2022, Bishnoi’s network, run partly through his Canada-based associate Goldy Brar, became a household name. Canadian politicians had for months urged Ottawa to act. Only after this pressure, and in the wake of Justin Trudeau’s ouster, did Ottawa finally yield.


Yet, the Canadian establishment continues to turn a blind eye to pro-Khalistan outfits operating freely on its soil, raising money, radicalising youth and openly glorifying violence against India.


The hypocrisy is staggering. Ottawa says it cannot tolerate acts of violence and terror that create a climate of fear and intimidation. Yet for decades, it has allowed extremist elements within its Sikh diaspora to hold rallies that feature effigies of Indian diplomats hanged in mock gallows, parades that lionise terrorists like Talwinder Parmar, the mastermind of the 1985 Air India bombing, and events where calls for India’s dismemberment are made under the banner of ‘free expression.’


When New Delhi raises objections, Canadian leaders retreat behind the shield of liberal platitudes. The Air India disaster itself remains the clearest reminder of Canada’s negligence. Air India Flight 182, blown out of the sky off the coast of Ireland in June 1985, killed 329 people, most of them Canadians of Indian origin. It was Canada’s worst-ever terror attack. And yet, successive governments treated it as an Indian tragedy rather than a Canadian one.


While Bishnoi’s criminal empire has rightly been throttled, Khalistani and Islamist networks still enjoy extraordinary leniency. Consider Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a designated terrorist in India but a ‘community leader’ in Canada until his death in 2023. Ex-PM Trudeau’s astonishing claim that Indian agents were behind Nijjar’s killing, made without evidence, had plunged ties with New Delhi to their lowest point in decades.


Only after Trudeau’s removal and Mark Carney’s rise to prime ministership has there been a cautious thaw. But if Canada is serious about rebuilding credibility, it must show equal resolve against Khalistani separatists as it has against Bishnoi. Anything less would prove that Ottawa’s fight against terror is a matter of convenience, not conviction.

Comments


bottom of page