top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

Accused trio get 10-day remand

Mumbai: A Mumbai Court has given 10 days police custody to three arrested accused in the firing on Bollywood action star Tiger Shroff in a crowded public place as the investigators attempt to unravel the conspiracy, motives, involvement of other players and related aspects of the sensational case, on Wednesday. The accused trio Rehan alias Sukka, and Phool Singh both from Sonipat in Haryana and Rhitik Kurmi alias Roshan, originally from Begusarai in Bihar but currently residing in Mumbai,...

Accused trio get 10-day remand

Mumbai: A Mumbai Court has given 10 days police custody to three arrested accused in the firing on Bollywood action star Tiger Shroff in a crowded public place as the investigators attempt to unravel the conspiracy, motives, involvement of other players and related aspects of the sensational case, on Wednesday. The accused trio Rehan alias Sukka, and Phool Singh both from Sonipat in Haryana and Rhitik Kurmi alias Roshan, originally from Begusarai in Bihar but currently residing in Mumbai, were brought here from Kota in separate vehicles early today. They were produced before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Esplanade Court where the police sought 14 days’ custody for the accused who are allegedly acting at the behest of the jailed mafia chief Lawrence Bishnoi’s gang. Pleading for the remand, the police lawyers argued that sustained custodial interrogation was necessary to recover the weapons used in the shooting – which the accused had thrown away while fleeing, retrieve two mobile phones which were reportedly destroyed by the accused, besides digging out the entire conspiracy, pinpoint the exact motives and identify other persons involved in the brazen attack. Opposing the plea, the accused’s lawyers Ajinkya Mirgal and Satyabrat Joshi argued that police custody was unnecessary, particularly for recovering the weapons. Mirgal and Joshi later told mediapersons that the accused had already been interrogated at a railway colony during their transit-remand period and were produced before the CMM Court just minutes before the transit remand expired this afternoon. After hearing both sides, the CMM remanded them to police custody for 10 days till October 31. It may be recalled that Shroff, 36, was targeted on the evening of October 18 near Pushpa Narsee Park in Juhu. Despite being a heavily crowded area, the assailants were seen firing at least 5-6 rounds at the actor’s car before fleeing on a motorcycle. A shaken Shroff escaped relatively unhurt, sustaining minor bruises, but his driver and a bystander suffered injuries. Following the incident, the Mumbai Police registered a case of attempted murder and offences under the Arms Act, and launched an interstate investigation involving Maharashtra, Haryana, Rajasthan, and later Gujarat and Delhi. The Mumbai Police formed 20 teams to hunt down the attackers, recovered the second-hand motorcycle outside Andheri station where it was abandoned and tracked their journey through different modes of transport from Mumbai to Surat and Kota. Acting on a tech-intel alert from Mumbai Police, the Kota Police lay in wait for them and apprehended them from the general coach of the Pune-Jaipur Superfast Express on Monday morning. Initial probe revealed that the assailants were planning to flee the country after travelling to the borders via Jaipur and Delhi. They were lured by the promise of sneaking them out of India to a foreign country, possibly Canada and rehabilitating them. Three key accused brought to Mumbai from Kota Three key accused apprehended in connection with the firing at actor Tiger Shroff’s car were brought to Mumbai from Kota in Rajasthan early on Wednesday, police said. Police brought them by road from Kota to Mumbai and, upon arrival, immediately took them to GT Hospital for a mandatory medical examination, an official said. Following the medical check-up, the accused were escorted to the Mumbai Crime Branch’s Anti-Extortion Cell (AEC) office for interrogation. The accused have been identified as Rehan alias Sukka, from Sonipat in Haryana; Ritik Kurmi alias Roshan, originally from Begusarai in Bihar and living in Mumbai; and Phool Singh from Haryana, the official said. The Kota city police had handed them over to Mumbai Police, which formally arrested them and produced them before a magistrate there. The court granted transit remand to take them to Mumbai. Meanwhile, advocate Ajinkya Mirgal arrived at the AEC office in Mumbai on Wednesday morning, informing officials that he would represent the accused as their defence counsel in the case. At least two men fired gunshots at Shroff’s car in Mumbai’s Juhu area on Sunday evening before speeding away on a motorcycle. The actor escaped relatively unhurt, while his driver and a bystander were injured. According to Mumbai Police, five to six rounds were fired at the car. A motorcycle, allegedly used by the shooters, was found abandoned in Andheri. The accused fled to Surat and once there, boarded a Jaipur-bound train. The three were supposed to go to Delhi on a bus and then flee to Nepal. The Mumbai Police have registered a case under the provisions of attempt to murder and the Arms Act. According to the police, Rehan was in touch with Anil Pandit, an alleged associate of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, which claimed responsibility for the attack in an unverified social media post. On Tuesday, the Delhi Police Special Cell arrested four more persons, including two women, in connection with the firing case. Police suspect they were acting on the directions of Anil Pandit, a gangster operating from abroad, an official earlier said. The four accused, identified as Kunal (21), Sumit (19), Radha (23), and Babita (23), were apprehended from Delhi and Haryana. According to police, Kunal allegedly collected a pistol and 20 rounds from Amritsar on the instructions of Anil Pandit, with Sumit accompanying him. Radha and Babita allegedly travelled to Mumbai with the weapon. Following the arrest, the police said the motive of the shooting was being ascertained, while the way Shroff was attacked, the assailants planned to kill him.

The Agitator from Silli

Aug 14
3 min read

A hunger strike over alleged exam irregularities has turned Devendra Mahto into the most visible face of Jharkhand’s youth discontent.

For nearly three weeks, Ranchi’s Jaipal Singh Munda Stadium has been the nerve centre of a student agitation over alleged irregularities in Jharkhand’s recruitment examinations. At its centre stands 33-year-old Devendra Nath Mahto, a student leader who has turned an indefinite hunger strike into both a political challenge and a test of the government’s willingness to listen.


Mahto began fasting on August 2 under the banner of the JPSC-JSSC Reforms Manch, after weeks of demonstrations, meetings and appeals failed to produce a breakthrough. His demand is straightforward: cancel examinations that students believe were compromised, investigate the alleged irregularities and overhaul the recruitment system. The government says it has accepted most of the students’ demands. The protesters say that claim is misleading. The resulting stalemate has made Mahto increasingly difficult to ignore.


His blood sugar and blood pressure fell sharply, he became dehydrated and doctors warned that his body was struggling to cope. He was shifted to Ranchi’s Sadar Hospital after his health deteriorated following a student march towards the State Assembly. Yet on August 13, from his hospital bed, Mahto wrote to the civil surgeon seeking permission to return to the protest site. “My body is undergoing treatment on the hospital bed, but my soul is at the satyagraha site,” he said.


With this, Mahto is consciously casting the agitation in the vocabulary of satyagraha. Sonam Wangchuk, the climate activist, urged him during a video call to drink water, warning that refusing both food and water amounted to suicide. Mahto agreed to take water and salt, but not food. He stood firm on his position that the hunger strike would continue until the demands were met.


His political journey began from Silli in Ranchi district. Mahto completed his higher education in 2020 at Dr Shyama Prasad Mukherjee University in Ranchi. His academic credentials are unusually broad: postgraduate degrees in Sanskrit, Kurmali, and Tribal and Regional Languages, all in first division, along with a B.Ed. Education. They constitute the terrain from which he emerged.


His entry into electoral politics came quickly. He contested the 2024 Lok Sabha election from Ranchi as an Independent. Later that year he fought the Silli assembly seat for the Jharkhand Loktantrik Krantikari Morcha (JLKM), the party he continues to represent. While electoral success has thus far eluded him, he has had more success with agitation.


In December 2024, when he was associated with the Jharkhand State Students’ Union, police detained him after a lathi-charge during demonstrations over alleged malpractice in the JSSC CGL document-verification process. That episode saw Mahto come into his own, as a standard-bearer of frustrated youth fighting an administrative system they believe is failing them.


The present agitation began with the declaration of the results of the 14th JPSC Preliminary Test. Students say the process was riddled with irregularities. They began protesting on July 5, met the Governor two days later, burnt an effigy on July 8 and presented evidence to Chief Minister Hemant Soren on July 20. When those efforts produced no settlement, Mahto escalated the confrontation.


The demands extend beyond a single examination. Protesters want the cancellation of several recruitment examinations conducted since 2019, a CBI investigation, disclosure of category-wise cut-offs, OMR sheets and response sheets, and action against those allegedly responsible. They also want a predictable recruitment calendar modelled on the UPSC and SSC systems. The larger complaint is therefore about trust as much as examinations.


The government’s attempts at negotiation have failed to settle the dispute. Protesters have remained unconvinced, particularly over the proposed investigation and the government’s claim that 98 percent of their demands have been met.


Meanwhile, Mahto has become the movement’s most recognisable. His central argument is that recruitment is a question of life or death for students in a state where government employment carries enormous significance.


Whether Mahto can convert physical sacrifice into political leverage remains uncertain. Hunger strikes often narrow the room for compromise. For now, however, his weakened body has made the Jharkhand government’s problem more visible. The man who once sought political relevance through elections has found it through protest. His next challenge is to turn that visibility into results without allowing the movement he leads to be consumed by the drama of his own sacrifice.

Comments


bottom of page