top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

The Arab Spring: Democracy’s Dream and its Unfinished Business

Thirteen years after the Arab Spring, the price of freedom across West Asia and the Arab world has been more chaos and instability

Arab world

More than a decade since the seismic tremors of the Arab Spring first rippled across the Middle East and North Africa, the outcomes remain as diverse and complex as the region itself. From the chaotic stalemate of Syria to the fragile transformations of Morocco and the simmering discontent in Bahrain, these movements have etched a lasting imprint on the political, social, and economic fabric of their nations. Yet nowhere are the consequences more tragic and instructive than in Yemen, where optimism collapsed into war, and Syria, where a revolution turned into one of the world’s most prolonged humanitarian disasters.


The Arab Spring, triggered by a young Tunisian fruit vendor’s self-immolation in December 2010, inspired millions across the Arab world to demand accountability, reform, and dignity from deeply entrenched regimes. What began as hopeful protests in squares from Sanaa to Manama quickly morphed into bloody crackdowns, civil wars, and even broader geopolitical proxy struggles. While Tunisia has emerged—albeit shakily—as a democratic success story, countries such as Yemen, Syria, and Libya remain case studies in how revolutions can collapse into dysfunction and despair.


Yemen was swept into the revolutionary fervour soon after the uprising in Syria gained momentum in early 2011. Protests against President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s 30-year rule were marked, at first, by optimism. Demonstrators called for Saleh’s resignation and demanded political and economic reforms. Saleh’s decades-long grip on power had been characterized by patronage, corruption, and growing inequality, which catalysed the anger of Yemen’s youth and civil society.


Initially, Saleh offered minor concessions, including promises that he would not transfer power to his son. Yet the violence escalated. Clashes between government loyalists and protesters turned deadly, forcing the international community—primarily the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)—to intervene. In late 2011, Saleh agreed to step down in exchange for immunity from prosecution, transferring power to his deputy, Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi, in 2012.


However, Yemen’s fragile transition collapsed within two years. The Houthi rebels—an Iran-aligned Shia insurgent group—exploited the political vacuum and seized the capital, Sanaa, in 2014. What began as an internal conflict quickly turned into a devastating proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran, with devastating consequences for civilians. Over 377,000 deaths have been recorded, millions have been displaced, and Yemen now stands as one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises.


Efforts to broker peace, including UN-sponsored negotiations and ceasefires, have been repeatedly sabotaged by shifting alliances and entrenched distrust. While other countries that experienced Arab Spring uprisings have begun to rebuild, Yemen remains trapped in a cycle of violence and humanitarian despair.


Bahrain’s uprising, which began in February 2011, carried echoes of its neighbours’ struggles but was uniquely shaped by the island nation’s sectarian divide. The Shia majority, long marginalized by the ruling Sunni elite, took to the streets to demand democratic reforms, an end to corruption, and greater representation. The protests, centered in Manama’s Pearl Roundabout, were met with a heavy-handed police crackdown that killed demonstrators and injured hundreds.


The ruling Al Khalifa family’s response illustrated a blend of coercion and superficial reform. King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa promised investigations into police violence and reforms to address grievances. Yet when these measures failed to appease the protesters, a more forceful intervention followed. In March 2011, Saudi Arabia, backed by a GCC military coalition, sent troops into Bahrain to quash the uprising. A state of emergency was declared, and opposition groups were suppressed with sweeping military and judicial powers.


Today, Bahrain remains a cautionary tale of unresolved grievances. Although the state projects an image of calm, the underlying tensions persist. Protests continue sporadically, but they are quickly quelled through surveillance, arrests, and intimidation. Bahrain’s small size and geopolitical alignment with Saudi Arabia ensure it remains a key player in the Gulf, yet the sectarian cleavages that drove the uprising remain unresolved.


In contrast to Yemen and Bahrain, Morocco managed to chart a more peaceful trajectory through the Arab Spring. Demonstrations began in Rabat and other major cities, as citizens demanded democratic reforms, an end to corruption, and greater social justice. However, King Mohammed VI, who enjoys significant legitimacy, responded with a series of measured reforms that defused much of the unrest.


In March 2011, the king promised constitutional reforms and established a commission to draft a new framework that would address some of the protesters’ demands. By July, a new constitution was approved in a nationwide referendum, winning support from 98% of voters. The reforms curtailed some of the king’s powers while enhancing the role of the elected parliament. Subsequent parliamentary elections saw the moderate Islamist Justice and Development Party (PJD) emerge as the dominant political force.


Although Morocco avoided the violent upheavals that consumed its neighbours, it is not without its challenges. Critics argue that many of the constitutional reforms were superficial and that the monarchy retains overwhelming control over policy and governance. Nevertheless, Morocco’s experience stands out as a rare example where the Arab Spring fostered incremental progress rather than chaos.


Nowhere has the Arab Spring’s tragic aftermath been more visible than in Syria, where it seems like open season after Assad’s recent collapse.


The Arab Spring began as an awakening of hope—a collective call for dignity, justice, and reform. Yet its outcomes reflect the stark disparities within the region. Tunisia, the birthplace of the uprisings, remains the lone democratic success story, albeit with growing economic woes. Egypt’s revolution led to a brief experiment with democracy before the military reclaimed control. Libya, like Yemen and Syria, descended into warlordism and chaos.


The unrest had also opened the door for extremist groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda to exploit power vacuums, exacerbating instability across the region. Syria’s war spilled across borders, reshaping geopolitics in ways that continue to reverberate after Assad’s fall. Yemen, once on the cusp of reform, now symbolizes the collapse of state institutions under the weight of external interference and internal divisions.


Bahrain and Morocco offer contrasting lessons. The former reveals the durability of Gulf monarchies, underpinned by external support and heavy-handed repression. Morocco, by contrast, demonstrates that carefully managed reforms—however limited—can prevent violent upheaval.


More than a decade on, the Arab Spring remains unfinished. Its legacy is visible in the bombed-out buildings of Sanaa, the enduring repression in Bahrain, and the hesitant reforms in Morocco. Syria stands as the most enduring and tragic reminder of what happens when peaceful demands for change are met with unchecked brutality.


The region’s youth, who once filled squares with chants of hope, are now left to navigate the wreckage of failed revolutions, deepening economic crises, and entrenched authoritarianism. While the international community has provided humanitarian aid and facilitated peace talks, the broader aspirations of the Arab Spring like accountability, dignity and democracy remain elusive.


In the end, the Arab Spring was less a single event than a protracted reckoning. For Yemen, Bahrain, Morocco, and perennially strife-torn Syria, that reckoning continues, each on its own jagged and unfinished path.

Comments


bottom of page