top of page

By:

Rahul Kulkarni

30 March 2025 at 3:32:54 pm

The Boundary Collapse

When kindness becomes micromanagement It started with a simple leave request.   “Hey, can I take Friday off? Need a personal day,” Meera messaged Rohit. Rohit replied instantly:   “Of course. All good. Just stay reachable if anything urgent comes up.”   He meant it as reassurance. But the team didn’t hear reassurance. They heard a rule.   By noon, two things had shifted inside The Workshop:   Meera felt guilty for even asking. Everyone else quietly updated their mental handbook: Leave is...

The Boundary Collapse

When kindness becomes micromanagement It started with a simple leave request.   “Hey, can I take Friday off? Need a personal day,” Meera messaged Rohit. Rohit replied instantly:   “Of course. All good. Just stay reachable if anything urgent comes up.”   He meant it as reassurance. But the team didn’t hear reassurance. They heard a rule.   By noon, two things had shifted inside The Workshop:   Meera felt guilty for even asking. Everyone else quietly updated their mental handbook: Leave is allowed… but not really. This is boundary collapse… when a leader’s good intentions unintentionally blur the limits that protect autonomy and rest. When care quietly turns into control Founders rarely intend to micromanage.   What looks like control from the outside often starts as care from the inside. “Let me help before something breaks.” “Let me stay involved so we don’t lose time.” “Loop me in… I don’t want you stressed.” Supportive tone.   Good intentions.   But one invisible truth defines workplace psychology: When power says “optional,” it never feels optional.
So when a client requested a revision, Rohit gently pinged:   “If you’re free, could you take a look?” Of course she logged in.   Of course she handled it.   And by Monday, the cultural shift was complete: Leave = location change, not a boundary.   A founder’s instinct had quietly become a system. Pattern 1: The Generous Micromanager Modern micromanagement rarely looks aggressive. It looks thoughtful :   “Let me refine this so you’re not stuck.” “I’ll review it quickly.”   “Share drafts so we stay aligned.”   Leaders believe they’re being helpful. Teams hear:   “You don’t fully trust me.” “I should check with you before finishing anything.”   “My decisions aren’t final.” Gentle micromanagement shrinks ownership faster than harsh micromanagement ever did because people can’t challenge kindness. Pattern 2: Cultural conditioning around availability In many Indian workplaces, “time off” has an unspoken footnote: Be reachable. Just in case. No one says it directly.   No one pushes back openly.   The expectation survives through habit: Leave… but monitor messages. Rest… but don’t disconnect. Recover… but stay alert. Contrast this with a global team we worked with: A designer wrote,   “I’ll be off Friday, but available if needed.” Her manager replied:   “If you’re working on your off-day, we mismanaged the workload… not the boundary.”   One conversation.   Two cultural philosophies.   Two completely different emotional outcomes.   Pattern 3: The override reflex Every founder has a version of this reflex.   Whenever Rohit sensed risk, real or imagined, he stepped in: Rewriting copy.   Adjusting a design.   Rescoping a task.   Reframing an email. Always fast.   Always polite.   Always “just helping.” But each override delivered one message:   “Your autonomy is conditional.” You own decisions…   until the founder feels uneasy.   You take initiative…   until instinct replaces delegation.   No confrontation.   No drama.   Just quiet erosion of confidence.   The family-business amplification Boundary collapse becomes extreme in family-managed companies.   We worked with one firm where four family members… founder, spouse, father, cousin… all had informal authority. Everyone cared.   Everyone meant well.   But for employees, decision-making became a maze: Strategy approved by the founder.   Aesthetics by the spouse.   Finance by the father. Tone by the cousin.   They didn’t need leadership.   They needed clarity.   Good intentions without boundaries create internal anarchy. The global contrast A European product team offered a striking counterexample.   There, the founder rarely intervened mid-stream… not because of distance, but because of design:   “If you own the decision, you own the consequences.” Decision rights were clear.   Escalation paths were explicit.   Authority didn’t shift with mood or urgency. No late-night edits.   No surprise rewrites.   No “quick checks.”   No emotional overrides. As one designer put it:   “If my boss wants to intervene, he has to call a decision review. That friction protects my autonomy.” The result:   Faster execution, higher ownership and zero emotional whiplash. Boundaries weren’t personal.   They were structural .   That difference changes everything. Why boundary collapse is so costly Its damage is not dramatic.   It’s cumulative.   People stop resting → you get presence, not energy.   People stop taking initiative → decisions freeze.   People stop trusting empowerment → autonomy becomes theatre.   People start anticipating the boss → performance becomes emotional labour.   People burn out silently → not from work, but from vigilance.   Boundary collapse doesn’t create chaos.   It creates hyper-alertness, the heaviest tax on any team. The real paradox Leaders think they’re being supportive. Teams experience supervision.   Leaders assume boundaries are obvious. Teams see boundaries as fluid. Leaders think autonomy is granted. Teams act as though autonomy can be revoked at any moment. This is the Boundary Collapse → a misunderstanding born not from intent, but from the invisible weight of power. Micromanagement today rarely looks like anger.   More often,   it looks like kindness without limits. (Rahul Kulkarni is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. He patterns the human mechanics of scaling where workplace behavior quietly shapes business outcomes. Views personal.)

The Big Show’s Final Curtain Call

ree

Once upon a time, Glenn Maxwell was cricket’s equivalent of a rockstar who could play a sold-out stadium gig on a broken guitar with one hand tied behind his back. The man who, on one leg, dragged Australia to World Cup glory in 2023 with a knock so absurd it felt like he was trolling physics itself—201 not out against Afghanistan, a score that still sounds like it belongs in a sci-fi novel. That was Maxi at his peak: a swaggering, switch-hitting, boundary-bludgeoning genius who made bowlers question their career choices.


Fast forward to 2025, and the same man can’t buy a run in minor league cricket, where the only thing he’s smashing is his own reputation. It’s time for Glenn Maxwell to retire from all forms of cricket, not because we want him to, but because watching him limp through this twilight is like watching a once-great comedian bomb on open-mic night. Painful. Cringe-inducing. Almost cruel.


Let’s be honest: Maxwell’s current form is less “Big Show” and more “No Show.” In the past year, his scoresheets read like a binary code for failure—0, 4, 2, 7, 1. He’s been dismissed in ways that would make a tailender blush: bowled through the gate, caught in the slips, lbw to a ball he could’ve hit blindfolded in his prime. Minor league bowlers, who probably moonlight as Uber drivers, are now outsmarting him. These are guys who wouldn’t have dared look him in the eye during his IPL heyday, yet here they are, sending him back to the pavilion with the smugness of a cat that just knocked over a vase. It’s not just sad; it’s darkly hilarious, like watching a lion get outrun by a chihuahua.


Maxwell’s decline isn’t just a dip in form—it’s a full-blown nosedive into the abyss. The man who once reverse-swept spinners into oblivion now looks like he’s auditioning for a role as “confused batsman #3” in a low-budget cricket movie. His footwork is so sluggish it could be mistaken for interpretive dance. His bat swing, once a thing of violent beauty, now resembles a tired lumberjack chopping at a sequoia. And don’t get me started on his fielding. The guy who used to pluck catches out of thin air like a magician pulling rabbits from hats now moves like he’s wading through molasses. Every misfield is a tiny dagger to the heart of fans who still cling to the memory of that 2014 IPL season when he was a one-man wrecking crew.


The irony is deliciously bitter. Maxwell, the ultimate freelancer, the T20 globetrotter who turned franchise cricket into his personal ATM, is now being chewed up and spat out by the very system he mastered. Leagues like the Big Bash, ILT20, and whatever alphabet-soup tournament pops up next used to be his playground. Now, they’re his graveyard. Teams still sign him, of course, because nostalgia is a hell of a drug, and his name still sells jerseys. But the returns are diminishing faster than a crypto bro’s portfolio. He’s become cricket’s equivalent of a washed-up boy band, trotted out for reunion tours that nobody asked for, lip-syncing hits from a decade ago while the crowd politely claps.


And yet, there’s a part of me—a masochistic, morbidly curious part—that wants to keep watching this trainwreck. There’s something darkly comedic about seeing a man who once toyed with international attacks now flailing against part-time spinners in front of half-empty stands. It’s like a Greek tragedy scripted by a stand-up comic. Hubris, thy name is Maxwell.


The gods of cricket gave him everything—talent, flair, a World Cup-defining moment—and now they’re collecting their dues with interest. Every duck, every dropped catch, every awkward press conference where he mumbles about “backing himself” is another twist of the knife.


But enough is enough. For his sake, for our sake, Maxwell needs to call it quits. Retire, Glenn. In the end, Maxwell’s legacy is secure. He’s one of Australia’s great white-ball mavericks, a player who redefined what was possible in the shorter formats. But legacies aren’t built on stubbornness. They’re preserved by knowing when to walk away. So, Glenn, take a bow, tip your hat, and exit stage left before the boos get any louder. The Big Show deserves a standing ovation, not a pity clap. The curtain’s already falling.


(The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai.)

1 Comment


I value tools that help me make informed bets, which is why their detailed statistics, match histories, and performance charts stood out. These insights are handy before deciding where to place funds. I dug into those features through jeetbuzz bangladesh and found the analytics clear, well-organized, and genuinely useful for strategic gameplay.

Edited
Like
bottom of page