top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Thrills, roars and cheers under a giant marquee

Rambo Circus pitches a tent in MMR Mumbai : Mumbaikars are thronging to rediscover the joys of stunning, live entertainment as the familiar Rambo Circus has pitched a tent in Borivali West, before it shifts to Navi Mumbai from December 2.   This is billed as the first major full-scale season post-Covid-19 pandemic, which had led to a near washout of shows owing to social-distancing norms and public fears. The tent is now attracting a strong public response, said Rambo Circus Director and...

Thrills, roars and cheers under a giant marquee

Rambo Circus pitches a tent in MMR Mumbai : Mumbaikars are thronging to rediscover the joys of stunning, live entertainment as the familiar Rambo Circus has pitched a tent in Borivali West, before it shifts to Navi Mumbai from December 2.   This is billed as the first major full-scale season post-Covid-19 pandemic, which had led to a near washout of shows owing to social-distancing norms and public fears. The tent is now attracting a strong public response, said Rambo Circus Director and owner Sujit Dilip.   “We get good crowds on weekends and holidays, but weekdays are still a struggle. Our fixed expenses are around Rs. One Crore per month. Costs have gone up nearly ten times on all fronts in the last five years, and the 18% GST is killing. We manage around 1,500 shows annually, but barely break even, with wafer-thin margins,” said Dilip, 50.   The logistics alone are staggering. Rambo Circus travels across India with an 80-member troupe of acrobats, aerialists, sword balancers, jugglers, jokers, rigging crews, support staff, massive equipment, and a few mechanical animals.   “Many of my people have spent their entire lives under the tent. We live like a huge family. I try to support their children’s education, medical needs and help them build some financial stability. But without resources, it is becoming increasingly difficult,” said Dilip, his voice weary after decades of struggle for survival.   He reminisced of the golden era of Indian circus, around the second half of the last century, when there were many grand, full-scale circuses, but today barely half a dozen professional setups remain - Gemini, Golden, Ajanta, Asian, Great Bombay, and Rambo - along with a few smaller, local outfits.   “Unlike most countries where circuses come under the Cultural Ministry, India offers no institutional identity or support. I am invited as a jury member to several top annual international circus festivals. I feel sad as not a single Indian artist features on global stages. We just have no backing here,” Dilip told The Perfect Voice in a free-wheeling chat.   He said the decline accelerated after the ban on live animal performances nearly 20 years ago in India. In contrast, many foreign circuses still feature elephants, horses, bears, zebras, llamas, tigers, leopards, lions, and exotic birds - though most face heavy resistance from animal-rights groups.   “Moreover, ticket rates in India are among the lowest in the world, without tax concessions. In foreign circuses, even in smaller countries, tickets start at Rs 10,000 per head. We can’t dare match that…” he rued.   Yet, the thirst to lure audiences remains undiminished. Rambo Circus now leans on technology and innovation, featuring a mechanical elephant, a giraffe on stilts, stuffed zebras, deer, bears and horses, and has commissioned a Japanese company to design a robotic lion to perform tricks.   To make the shows more interactive, MoC – a tall senior joker – invites the young audience members into the ring to try small acts like skipping, jumping, or dancing with help from the midget clowns, and the kids’ shrieks of joy echo through the tent, as their parents furiously click videos and selfies.   Dilip recalled that during the pandemic lockdown, when survival seemed impossible, Rambo Circus pioneered online ticketed shows, selling nearly 50,000 virtual tickets - the highest among circuses worldwide at that time, and earned praise by international peers.   “We are swimming alone… For us, it’s not just entertainment. It is art, heritage, livelihood, identity, and passion - and we will fight for a dignified existence,” Dilip said quietly.   Rambo Circus’ emotional tug at PM’s heart Rambo Circus Director and owner Sujit Dilip appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to help save this art form with a huge potential to generate jobs, discover talents, earn massive revenues and foreign exchange.   “We urge the PM and ICCR to give Indian circuses a formal status, affordable venues for our shows, extend bank loans, opportunities for skill-upgradation, foreign collaborations and inclusion under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs’ CSR list. Many corporates wish to help, but current rules prevent it,” Dilip told The Perfect Voice .   He recalled how, during Covid-19, Rambo Circus launched online shows and sold nearly 50,000 tickets, proving the potential of Indian circus talent and earning acclaim worldwide for his innovation. “Our dream is to make India’s circuses world-class, and we need government support to achieve this,” he said.   History of circuses – Roman Arenas to open maidans The name ‘circus’ had its origins in ancient Rome, where chariot races, gladiator clashes, displays/deadly fights between wild animals and condemned humans enraptured audiences in huge open arenas. Later, circuses began modestly in 1768 with horse tricks performed by Philip Astley, a London cavalryman. Then, came the modern version of live performances by horses/ponies in the US in 1793, and in the 1830s, wild animals were introduced.   Many Hollywood films featured circuses as the backdrop. The most memorable ones are: Charlie Chaplin’s “The Circus” (1928); Walt Disney’s “Dumbo’ (1941); Cecile B. DeMille’s 2 Oscar Award-winning “The Greatest Show on Earth” (1952); biopic on P.T. Barnum “The Greatest Showman” (2017), et al.   Bollywood’s own legendary ringside acts were in films like Raj Kapoor’s “Mera Naam Joker” (1970); “Chandralekha” (1948); “Appu Raja” (1989); “Circus Queen” (1959); “Shikari” (1991); “Dhoom 3” (2013); and the howlarious circus climax in Firoz A. Nadiadwala’s “Phir Hera Pheri” (2006), etc.

The Conversion Candidate

Once the voice of Appalachian disillusionment, America’s Vice-President now plays to the MAGA gallery, as remarks on his Hindu wife expose the uneasy marriage between faith and opportunism.

ree

Few politicians embody America’s moral whiplash quite like Vice-President J.D. Vance. Once a sceptic of Donald Trump and the politics of resentment, he has reinvented himself as Trumpism’s most polished apostle. This week, that balancing act came perilously close to collapse.


At a Turning Point USA event in Mississippi, Vance told a rapt conservative crowd that he hoped his Hindu wife, Usha, would one day convert to Christianity. He was careful to add that she had “the free will not to.” But the qualification could not blunt the blow as his interfaith marriage swiftly became a flashpoint. On social media and elsewhere, it rapidly became a test of whether America’s second-highest office can still speak to pluralism without genuflecting before the altar of Christian nationalism.


The irony is stark. A decade ago, Vance was the unlikely chronicler of forgotten America. His 2016 memoir ‘Hillbilly Elegy’ was an intimate, ambivalent portrait of working-class despair and was hailed as an antidote to the populist rage that would soon sweep Trump to power. Yet, within a few years, Vance would swap his role as interpreter for that of disciple. His political ‘awakening’ came with his 2019 baptism into Catholicism and his 2022 vice-presidential run alongside Trump. From Ohio populist to evangelical politician, his metamorphosis was not just theological but strategic.


This latest controversy fits neatly into that pattern. Faced with a question from an Indian-origin student about his wife’s Hindu heritage and the place of non-Christians in America, Vance began with the mild detachment of a Yale-trained lawyer. Usha, he said, had grown up Hindu but “not in a particularly religious household.” He added that both were “agnostic or atheist” when they met. Then came the political calculation: “I hope eventually my wife comes to see things as I do.”


The line drew applause from the young, conservative crowd and outrage from Indian Americans and Indians, who called him “Hinduphobic.” Diplomats and commentators accused him of hypocrisy.Vance’s damage-control response was revealing. “My wife is the most amazing blessing in my life,” he wrote on X, praising her for encouraging his rediscovery of faith. She had “no plans to convert,” he conceded, but he hoped she might “see things as I do.” To his MAGA base, it was proof of conviction. To his critics, it was confirmation that even his marriage was not safe from political choreography.


Vance’s critics have long noted his knack for reinvention. Once a vocal critic of Trump - calling him “an idiot” and warning he could become “America’s Hitler” - Vance later declared him the saviour of the working class.


Now, his faith is once again the centrepiece. His public musings about his wife’s conversion appear designed to flatter the Christian right, for whom family and faith are not private choices but ideological proofs. And in an era when MAGA’s moral code prizes public piety as political loyalty, Vance knows exactly which hymnal to sing from.


For all the noise, the episode also reveals a deeper insecurity. Vance, who owes his rise to the populist right, cannot afford to be seen as soft on religion or identity. Yet his very life defies the purity his base demands: a Catholic convert married to a Hindu, raising children named Vivek and Mirabel, occasionally photographed at Hindu temples.


So, he walks a tightrope by proclaiming love at home and conviction in public. But in trying to please both, he risks alienating all. Usha Vance, by all accounts a private and accomplished woman, has become collateral in his pursuit of power. His faith, meanwhile, is increasingly indistinguishable from performance.


Whether this controversy lingers may not matter. Yet, the episode leaves a bitter aftertaste. In a nation that has long prided itself on the separation of church and state, Vance’s language blurs that line, turning personal faith into political currency.


Disturbingly, his remarks reflect a darker undercurrent in America’s ongoing culture wars of the growing hostility faced by Hindus from an ascendant strain of White Christian nationalism. For the millions of Indian-Americans who quietly practise their faith, the Vice President’s invocation of “hope” for his wife’s conversion may sound benign to MAGA cheerleaders, but to many Hindus, it is a reminder that full acceptance in MAGA America comes with an asterisk: one must first kneel at the cross.

Comments


bottom of page