top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Infrastructure moment in MMR

Mumbai: The Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) stands at a critical inflection point as the Mahayuti alliance secured near-complete control over key municipal corporations across the region. With aligned political leadership at the state and civic levels, the long-fragmented governance architecture of India’s most complex urban agglomeration may finally see greater coherence in planning and execution. For a region grappling with mobility stress, water insecurity and uneven urban expansion, the...

Infrastructure moment in MMR

Mumbai: The Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) stands at a critical inflection point as the Mahayuti alliance secured near-complete control over key municipal corporations across the region. With aligned political leadership at the state and civic levels, the long-fragmented governance architecture of India’s most complex urban agglomeration may finally see greater coherence in planning and execution. For a region grappling with mobility stress, water insecurity and uneven urban expansion, the question now is not what to build—but how quickly and seamlessly projects can be delivered. Urban mobility remains the backbone of MMR’s infrastructure agenda. Several metro corridors are at advanced stages, including the Andheri West–Vikhroli Metro Line 6 and extensions of the Colaba–Bandra–SEEPZ Metro Line 3. While construction has progressed steadily, coordination issues with municipal agencies—particularly related to road restoration, utilities shifting and traffic management—have often slowed execution. With elected civic bodies now politically aligned with the state government and agencies like MMRDA and MMRC, these bottlenecks are expected to ease. Decision-making on road closures, permissions for casting yards and last-mile integration with buses and footpaths could see faster turnarounds. Suburban rail projects such as the Panvel–Karjat corridor and additional railway lines on the Central and Western routes are also likely to benefit from smoother land acquisition and rehabilitation approvals, traditionally the most contentious municipal functions. Regional Connectivity MMR’s road infrastructure has expanded rapidly in recent years, but execution has often been uneven across municipal boundaries. Projects such as the Mumbai Coastal Road, the Goregaon–Mulund Link Road, the Thane–Borivali tunnel and the Airoli–Katai connector have regional significance but require constant coordination with local bodies for utilities, encroachments and traffic planning. Under a unified civic dispensation, authorities expect fewer inter-agency delays and greater willingness at the municipal level to prioritise regionally critical projects over hyper-local political considerations. The next phase of the Coastal Road, suburban creek bridges, and arterial road widening projects in fast-growing nodes like Vasai-Virar, Kalyan-Dombivli and Panvel could be streamlined as municipal corporations align their development plans with state transport objectives. Water Security Water supply remains one of the most politically sensitive infrastructure issues in MMR, particularly in peripheral urban zones. Projects such as the Surya Regional Water Supply Scheme and proposed dam developments in the Karjat region are designed to address chronic shortages in Mira-Bhayandar, Vasai-Virar and parts of Navi Mumbai. While these projects are state-driven, municipal cooperation is critical for distribution networks, billing systems and sewerage integration. With elected bodies replacing administrators, local governments are expected to accelerate last-mile pipelines, treatment plants and sewage networks that often lag behind bulk water infrastructure. Unified political control may also reduce resistance to tariff rationalisation and long-delayed sewage treatment upgrades mandated under environmental norms. Housing Integration One area where political alignment could have an outsized impact is redevelopment—particularly slum rehabilitation and transit-oriented development. Many large housing projects have stalled due to disputes between civic officials, state agencies and local political interests. A cohesive governance structure could fast-track approvals for cluster redevelopment near metro corridors, unlocking both housing supply and ridership potential. Municipal corporations are also likely to align their development control regulations more closely with state urban policy, enabling higher density near transport nodes and more predictable redevelopment timelines. This could be transformative for older suburbs and industrial belts awaiting regeneration. The return of elected municipal councils after years of administrative rule introduces political accountability but also sharper alignment with state priorities. Budget approvals, tendering processes and policy decisions that earlier faced delays due to political uncertainty are expected to move faster. Capital expenditure plans could increasingly reflect regional priorities rather than fragmented ward-level demands. However, challenges remain. Faster execution will depend not only on political control but on institutional capacity, contractor performance and financial discipline. Public scrutiny is also likely to intensify as elected representatives seek visible results within fixed tenures.

The Conversion Candidate

Once the voice of Appalachian disillusionment, America’s Vice-President now plays to the MAGA gallery, as remarks on his Hindu wife expose the uneasy marriage between faith and opportunism.

Few politicians embody America’s moral whiplash quite like Vice-President J.D. Vance. Once a sceptic of Donald Trump and the politics of resentment, he has reinvented himself as Trumpism’s most polished apostle. This week, that balancing act came perilously close to collapse.


At a Turning Point USA event in Mississippi, Vance told a rapt conservative crowd that he hoped his Hindu wife, Usha, would one day convert to Christianity. He was careful to add that she had “the free will not to.” But the qualification could not blunt the blow as his interfaith marriage swiftly became a flashpoint. On social media and elsewhere, it rapidly became a test of whether America’s second-highest office can still speak to pluralism without genuflecting before the altar of Christian nationalism.


The irony is stark. A decade ago, Vance was the unlikely chronicler of forgotten America. His 2016 memoir ‘Hillbilly Elegy’ was an intimate, ambivalent portrait of working-class despair and was hailed as an antidote to the populist rage that would soon sweep Trump to power. Yet, within a few years, Vance would swap his role as interpreter for that of disciple. His political ‘awakening’ came with his 2019 baptism into Catholicism and his 2022 vice-presidential run alongside Trump. From Ohio populist to evangelical politician, his metamorphosis was not just theological but strategic.


This latest controversy fits neatly into that pattern. Faced with a question from an Indian-origin student about his wife’s Hindu heritage and the place of non-Christians in America, Vance began with the mild detachment of a Yale-trained lawyer. Usha, he said, had grown up Hindu but “not in a particularly religious household.” He added that both were “agnostic or atheist” when they met. Then came the political calculation: “I hope eventually my wife comes to see things as I do.”


The line drew applause from the young, conservative crowd and outrage from Indian Americans and Indians, who called him “Hinduphobic.” Diplomats and commentators accused him of hypocrisy.Vance’s damage-control response was revealing. “My wife is the most amazing blessing in my life,” he wrote on X, praising her for encouraging his rediscovery of faith. She had “no plans to convert,” he conceded, but he hoped she might “see things as I do.” To his MAGA base, it was proof of conviction. To his critics, it was confirmation that even his marriage was not safe from political choreography.


Vance’s critics have long noted his knack for reinvention. Once a vocal critic of Trump - calling him “an idiot” and warning he could become “America’s Hitler” - Vance later declared him the saviour of the working class.


Now, his faith is once again the centrepiece. His public musings about his wife’s conversion appear designed to flatter the Christian right, for whom family and faith are not private choices but ideological proofs. And in an era when MAGA’s moral code prizes public piety as political loyalty, Vance knows exactly which hymnal to sing from.


For all the noise, the episode also reveals a deeper insecurity. Vance, who owes his rise to the populist right, cannot afford to be seen as soft on religion or identity. Yet his very life defies the purity his base demands: a Catholic convert married to a Hindu, raising children named Vivek and Mirabel, occasionally photographed at Hindu temples.


So, he walks a tightrope by proclaiming love at home and conviction in public. But in trying to please both, he risks alienating all. Usha Vance, by all accounts a private and accomplished woman, has become collateral in his pursuit of power. His faith, meanwhile, is increasingly indistinguishable from performance.


Whether this controversy lingers may not matter. Yet, the episode leaves a bitter aftertaste. In a nation that has long prided itself on the separation of church and state, Vance’s language blurs that line, turning personal faith into political currency.


Disturbingly, his remarks reflect a darker undercurrent in America’s ongoing culture wars of the growing hostility faced by Hindus from an ascendant strain of White Christian nationalism. For the millions of Indian-Americans who quietly practise their faith, the Vice President’s invocation of “hope” for his wife’s conversion may sound benign to MAGA cheerleaders, but to many Hindus, it is a reminder that full acceptance in MAGA America comes with an asterisk: one must first kneel at the cross.

Comments


bottom of page