top of page

By:

Abhijit Joshi

31 August 2024 at 10:09:24 am

Sunetra Pawar’s Trial by Fire

The greatest challenge before Maharashtra’s first Deputy CM is not merely to govern, but to forge a political identity that is unmistakably her own. Politics often rewards the loudest voice. The modern political arena thrives on sharp sound bites, relentless television appearances and instant responses on social media. Yet, some leaders begin their journey not with thunder but with quiet resolve. Maharashtra’s Deputy Chief Minister Sunetra Pawar finds herself at precisely such a moment. In...

Sunetra Pawar’s Trial by Fire

The greatest challenge before Maharashtra’s first Deputy CM is not merely to govern, but to forge a political identity that is unmistakably her own. Politics often rewards the loudest voice. The modern political arena thrives on sharp sound bites, relentless television appearances and instant responses on social media. Yet, some leaders begin their journey not with thunder but with quiet resolve. Maharashtra’s Deputy Chief Minister Sunetra Pawar finds herself at precisely such a moment. In recent days, she has been drawn into an avoidable political controversy after the Maharashtra Congress dubbed her as “Gungi Gudiya” (“mute doll”) following a media interaction in which she chose not to answer journalists' questions. The remark quickly snowballed into a wider debate about the language used against women occupying high constitutional office. It also revived memories of the same epithet once directed at late Congress Prime Minister Indira Gandhi before she went on to become one of India’s most formidable political figures. Until recently, Sunetra Pawar remained largely outside the glare of frontline politics. She was better known in Baramati for her work in education, healthcare and social welfare than for fiery speeches or electoral campaigns. Her public image was that of a composed, private individual who preferred institution-building to political theatre. Political Limelight That changed in 2024 when she entered electoral politics, contesting the Lok Sabha election from Baramati against her sister-in-law, Supriya Sule. Though unsuccessful, she later entered Parliament through the Rajya Sabha, where she quietly focused on organisational responsibilities and social initiatives rather than cultivating a high-profile parliamentary persona. The defining moment came in January this year with the tragic death of her husband, Ajit Pawar, one of the state’s most experienced and influential political leaders. His passing created a political vacuum within the Nationalist Congress Party. At a moment of uncertainty, Sunetra Pawar stepped forward to shoulder responsibilities that few had imagined she would inherit so soon. Within days, she became Maharashtra’s first woman Deputy Chief Minister - a milestone in the state’s political history. But such transitions are rarely straightforward. Political parties often struggle when towering personalities disappear, and observers had predicted that the NCP might witness internal divisions. Maintaining organisational cohesion during a leadership transition is itself a considerable achievement, particularly in a state where political loyalties are often fluid and intensely personalised. However, much of the public conversation around Sunetra Pawar continues to be framed through comparisons with Ajit Pawar. The contrast is obvious. Ajit Pawar was known for his decisiveness, administrative grip and unmistakable public presence. Sunetra Pawar, by contrast, has generally remained soft-spoken, measured and reluctant to engage in unnecessary confrontation. Her supporters see restraint, dignity and maturity but critics see hesitation and insufficient public engagement. Neither assessment is entirely unfair. That is why the recent Beed incident acquired significance beyond a routine press interaction. When reporters sought her comments on law and order and she chose to leave without responding, the political vacuum was quickly filled by her opponents. The Congress’s “Gungi Gudiya” remark predictably provoked protests from the NCP and criticism from leaders across the ruling alliance, many of whom argued that such language diminished the dignity of a woman holding one of the state’s highest offices. Sunetra Pawar’s own response was notably restrained. She said she would offer a “fitting reply at the appropriate time.” The remark was consistent with the temperament she has displayed since entering public life. Leadership is ultimately judged not only by composure but also by visibility. Every major political figure eventually reaches a point where inherited legitimacy must give way to earned authority. Indira Gandhi had to step beyond Jawaharlal Nehru's towering legacy before she was recognised in her own right. Rajiv Gandhi, too, had to emerge from the shadow of Indira Gandhi while navigating extraordinary political circumstances. Their journeys were shaped by vastly different contexts, but they illustrate a universal truth: every successor must eventually become an original. Sunetra Pawar now confronts a similar, though far more modest, challenge. She must cease to be viewed primarily as “Ajit Pawar's wife” and come into her own. Distinct Identity That transformation cannot be achieved through symbolism alone. After all, lasting political stature is built through decisions, administrative outcomes and public confidence. To her credit, she has remained engaged with governance, regularly attending official programmes, reviewing development projects and interacting with citizens instead of chasing daily headlines. Yet the next stage of leadership demands something more. She will need to engage more confidently with the media, articulate her government's priorities in her own voice, and establish an administrative record that reflects independent judgement rather than inherited expectations. These are demanding tasks, but they are neither unusual nor unattainable. It is still too soon to measure Sunetra Pawar’s political legacy. She assumed responsibility at a moment when both her party and the state were adjusting to an unexpected transition, and has so far navigated that passage with composure. Yet political inheritance has a limited shelf life. While quietness, in itself, is neither a virtue nor a weakness, it acquires meaning only when it is accompanied by clarity and conviction. If Sunetra Pawar is to leave an enduring imprint on Maharashtra's politics, it will not be by echoing the style of Ajit Pawar or by answering every taunt from her opponents. It will be by developing a public voice that reflects her own instincts, her own priorities and, ultimately, her own leadership. (The writer is a political observer. Views personal.)

The engineer nobody touched

An inquiry into Pune’s civic works lifts the veil on a sprawling nexus and a familiar political silence

Pune: The Supreme Court’s directive to the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) to investigate the assets of a retired City Engineer from the Pune Municipal Corporation has sent shockwaves through the city. For the residents of Pune, the inner workings of the Construction Department and the illicit gains amassed by some of its shrewd officials are nothing new; however, this investigation has thrust the department and the corruption within it into the public spotlight.


Illicit Wealth

Social activist Tanaji Gambhire has alleged that the retired City Engineer, Prashant Waghmare, has amassed wealth amounting to a staggering Rs. 2,000 crore. When the municipal administration repeatedly failed to act despite numerous complaints regarding Waghmare’s alleged corruption, Gambhire finally knocked on the doors of the judiciary. The Supreme Court admitted Gambhire’s complaint and issued orders to investigate Waghmare’s disproportionate assets. Waghmare served as the City Engineer at the Pune Municipal Corporation from 2003 to 2026.


This marks the first instance in which the assets of the Municipal Corporation’s City Engineer are being subjected to a formal investigation. Social activists will be closely watching to see just how seriously the State Government pursues this inquiry. The reason for this scrutiny lies in the fact that Prashant Waghmare reportedly maintains "friendly" ties with "all" political leaders across the spectrum. Not a single corporator has ever forcefully exposed or scrutinized his conduct during the Municipal Corporation's general body meetings. Such was his clout that it was commonly whispered within municipal circles: “If Waghmare is involved, anything is possible,” and “No one can touch Waghmare.” Despite the Supreme Court delivering a decisive verdict regarding this Rs. 2,000 crore scandal, political leaders have maintained a conspicuous silence - a fact that has left social activists astonished.


Familiar Saga

For the city’s residents, the Municipal Corporation’s Construction Department and the irregularities plaguing it, is a familiar saga. The traffic crisis in Pune has reached a critical stage, and the corruption within the Construction Department of the Municipal Corporation is largely to blame. In the construction of most buildings, insufficient space is allocated for parking. Furthermore, builders often fail to make adequate arrangements for drinking water supply. Flat buyers are frequently left bewildered by revised building plans. Customers purchase flats under the mistaken assumption that the mere fact that a building has been erected implies its legality.


Consequently, the city's traffic infrastructure collapses. Municipal officials convey their 'messages' to builders through architects; the cost of these illicit transactions is ultimately passed on to the customer. This practice has persisted for years. It is, however, equally true that not all architects are involved in these corrupt dealings.


Pune is a major metropolis. Over the past two decades, the construction sector has boomed. The industry generates a turnover running into crores of rupees annually; the beneficiaries of this massive financial activity are not limited solely to officials within the municipal administration. Rather, a vast network comprising of certain police officers, revenue department officials, and criminal gangs is deeply entrenched in this system. There is open discussion throughout Pune regarding how certain officials within the Construction Department have acquired properties in the names of their wives or sisters. Builders frequently make donations to public institutions, thereby cementing their influence and position within the city.


Historically, rampant corruption plagued the Octroi Department within municipal corporations. With the abolition of the Octroi tax, the construction sector emerged as the new fertile ground for illicit gains. Some time ago, a controversy erupted regarding the construction of a building for a certain organization; even religious leaders joined the ensuing protests. During that episode, the name of a prominent political leader surfaced, sparking rumours of a nexus between the builder and the politician in question. Currently, the names of various political leaders are being linked to several ongoing construction projects across the city. For instance, a post office located in the city center was relocated to make way for a new construction project; the builder involved now openly boasts with evident pride that he enlisted the assistance of a Union Minister to facilitate the shifting of that post office.


Residents of Pune hope that, at the very least following this incident, there will be an improvement in the functioning of the Construction Department and the Anti-Encroachment Department. Many homebuyers find themselves stuck in various construction schemes; there are complaints that while some have already paid for their flats, they have yet to receive possession of the respective units. The State Government must look into these grievances and take steps to resolve them. With high-rise buildings springing up across the city, due consideration must also be given to infrastructure, specifically roads, water supply and drainage systems while granting permissions for such structures. The Pune Municipal Corporation was once served by a City Engineer who famously declared, “As the City Engineer, my foremost priority is to ensure that the aesthetic beauty of the city remains uncompromised.” It would be fitting to at least honour and remember his vision.

Comments

bottom of page