top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city...

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city will get a ‘Hindu Marathi’ person to head India’s richest civic body, while the Opposition Shiv Sena (UBT)-Maharashtra Navnirman Sena also harbour fond hopes of a miracle that could ensure their own person for the post. The Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) optimism stems from expectations of possible political permutations-combinations that could develop with a realignment of forces as the Supreme Court is hearing the cases involving the Shiv Sena-Nationalist Congress Party this week. Catapulted as the largest single party, the BJP hopes to install a first ever party-man as Mayor, but that may not create history. Way back in 1982-1983, a BJP leader Dr. Prabhakar Pai had served in the top post in Mumbai (then Bombay). Incidentally, Dr. Pai hailed from Udupi district of Karnataka, and his appointment came barely a couple of years after the BJP was formed (1980), capping a distinguished career as a city father, said experts. Originally a Congressman, Dr. Pai later shifted to the Bharatiya Janata Party, then back to Congress briefly, founded the Janata Seva Sangh before immersing himself in social activities. Second Administrator The 2026 Mayoral elections have evoked huge interest not only among Mumbaikars but across the country as it comes after nearly four years since the BMC was governed by an Administrator. This was only the second time in the BMC history that an Administrator was named after April 1984-May 1985. On both occasions, there were election-related issues, the first time the elections got delayed for certain reasons and the second time the polling was put off owing to Ward delimitations and OBC quotas as the matter was pending in the courts. From 1931 till 2022, Mumbai has been lorded over by 76 Mayors, men and women, hailing from various regions, backgrounds, castes and communities. They included Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Parsis, Sikhs, even a Jew, etc., truly reflecting the cosmopolitan personality of the coastal city and India’s financial powerhouse. In 1931-1932, the Mayor was a Parsi, J. B. Boman Behram, and others from his community followed like Khurshed Framji Nariman (after whom Nariman Point is named), E. A. Bandukwala, Minoo Masani, B. N. Karanjia and other bigwigs. There were Muslims like Hoosenally Rahimtoola, Sultan M. Chinoy, the legendary Yusuf Meherally, Dr. A. U. Memon and others. The Christian community got a fair share of Mayors with Joseph A. D’Souza – who was Member of Constituent Assembly representing Bombay Province for writing-approving the Constitution of India, M. U. Mascarenhas, P. A. Dias, Simon C. Fernandes, J. Leon D’Souza, et al. A Jew Elijah Moses (1937-1938) and a Sikh M. H. Bedi (1983-1984), served as Mayors, but post-1985, for the past 40 years, nobody from any minority community occupied the august post. During the silver jubilee year of the post, Sulochana M. Modi became the first woman Mayor of Mumbai (1956), and later with tweaks in the rules, many women ruled in this post – Nirmala Samant-Prabhavalkar (1994-1995), Vishakha Raut (997-1998), Dr. Shubha Raul (March 2007-Nov. 2009), Shraddha Jadhav (Dec. 2009-March 2012), Snehal Ambedkar (Sep. 2014-March 2017). The last incumbent (before the Administrator) was a government nurse, Kishori Pednekar (Nov. 2019-March 2022) - who earned the sobriquet of ‘Florence Nightingale’ of Mumbai - as she flitted around in her full white uniform at the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic, earning the admiration of the citizens. Mumbai Mayor – high-profile post The Mumbai Mayor’s post is considered a crucial step in the political ladder and many went on to become MLAs, MPs, state-central ministers, a Lok Sabha Speaker, Chief Ministers and union ministers. The formidable S. K. Patil was Mayor (1949-1952) and later served in the union cabinets of PMs Jawaharlal Nehru, Lah Bahadur Shastri and Indira Gandhi; Dahyabhai V. Patel (1954-1955) was the son of India’s first Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel; Manohar Joshi (1976-1977) became the CM of Maharashtra, later union minister and Speaker of Lok Sabha; Chhagan Bhujbal (1985-1986 – 1990-1991) became a Deputy CM.

The German Decline in a Czech Mirror

In the contrast between Prague’s civility and Berlin’s malaise lies the tale of two post-totalitarian nations and the leaders who shaped them.

It has been thirty-four years since I last visited Prague. I returned recently to honour a Czech exile who died in Hamburg. I was amazed. The city is strikingly clean, orderly and self-possessed, almost absurdly so when compared to German cities of comparable size. Even the residential neighbourhoods beyond the historic centre seem lovingly maintained. Sidewalks are wide, often beautifully paved in vibrant colours, and notably unblemished by the scourge of dog dirt, despite the many dogs. Public bins are few, yet there is no rubbish. Graffiti, minimal. Trams and metros glide through the day without incident, even at peak hours. The atmosphere is one of understated grace and shared ease - something Germany, once familiar with, seems to have lost.


And yet, as you stroll through the old town, Prague makes you wince. You sense, in its buildings and bookshelves, the imprint of its German-Jewish past - Kafka, Brod, Kisch, Werfel. Until the Nazi invasion in 1939, Prague pulsed with German-language publishing houses, a refuge for writers exiled by Hitler’s regime. Here, before the Iron Curtain fell, free literature found sanctuary.


Today’s Prague is a city that remembers. Its youth wear ironic T-shirts mocking communism. Its culture lionizes dissidents like Václav Havel. In Germany, meanwhile, Angela Merkel is the icon - praised not for defiance, but for discretion. The difference is more than symbolic.


Havel was denied access to secondary school because of his bourgeois background. He endured Nazi occupation, the 1948 communist putsch, and the Slánský show trials. He was jailed for his activism, spent five years behind bars, and emerged not as a broken man but as the moral voice of Czechoslovakia. His courage, articulated in Charter 77 for which he was arrested, was of the stubborn, impractical kind that once gave Europe its conscience.


Merkel’s path was smoother. As the daughter of a socialist pastor in East Germany, she was allowed to study, to rise quietly, inconspicuously, through the GDR’s institutions. By the 1980s, she was active in the party’s youth agitprop apparatus, still doing PR work for a regime built on silence and compliance. When the Wall fell in 1989, she was in a sauna. Her subsequent political ascent was aided by two men, Wolfgang Schnur and Lothar de Maizière, both later unmasked as long-standing Stasi collaborators.


Both Merkel and Havel are, in a sense, children of 1989. But where Havel fought for civil liberties, Merkel inherited them. Where he defied the system, she mastered it. That difference, the defiant versus the deferential, echoes in their respective capitals.


Prague is calm, elegant, proud. There are no visible tensions over religion or identity. Jewish men can wear kippot or peyot without fear of attack. While pro-Hamas protests do occur, they are fringe, even mocked. Unlike in Berlin or Hamburg, where imported hatreds now roil the streets and tolerance has become a double-edged sword, Prague remains cosmopolitan but also secure in its cultural heritage. It embraces its Czech, Jewish and German past, not as burdens but as legacies.


I once thought Germany might head in that direction too. I remember traveling through Poland in 2005, passing the haunting remnants of Majdanek, Belzec and Auschwitz. My English-Canadian companion gently mocked me for having made peace with my Germanness. He was right to challenge me. And yet, back then, I did feel a flicker of pride - not for the past, but for what post-war Germany had become: sober, principled, liberal.


That same year, Merkel was elected chancellor.


Now, more than a quarter of a million Germans emigrate annually. Most are young, well-educated, and no longer see a future at home. High taxes, bloated bureaucracy, a declining quality of life: these are the surface symptoms. The deeper malaise stems from something else, a kind of moral self-annihilation disguised as virtue.


The eco-socialist moralism of Germany’s political class demands that its citizens atone endlessly. To save the climate, they must sacrifice their prosperity. To atone for past sins, they must embrace unlimited migration. Culture must become a blank slate. Empathy, boundless and unthinking, is now a policy. State-funded and ideological NGOs smuggle in migrants who overwhelm a fraying welfare system. Those who protest are slurred as ‘racists,’ ‘Nazis,’ or worse.


Germany’s cultural elite seems determined to erase its own identity. Claudia Roth, the Green Party’s cultural commissioner, once marched behind a banner that read, “Germany, you lousy piece of shit.” On another: “Germany, perish!” The line between irony and pathology is no longer visible.


Meanwhile, the sidewalks of Prague are clean. Its façades are not yet defaced. Its citizens walk upright. Its dissident legacy - Havel’s legacy - lives on, not as nostalgia, but as political instinct. Czechs know what foreign domination feels like. They understand the value of freedom. They defend their culture not with chauvinism, but with care.


The Germans, by contrast, have become captives of a new orthodoxy, one less violent than the old ones, but no less totalizing. Democracy, once lived, is now stage-managed. Public discourse is filtered through ‘firewalls’ against wrongthink. The suspicion of patriotism has become a national dogma.


This is the difference between Havel and Merkel. Between a dissident and a functionary. Between memory and forgetting. As I walked Prague’s streets and breathed its air, admired its ornate rooftops, listened to its gentle quiet, I felt not envy, but grief. Grief for what my own country once was. Grief for what it might still have been.


(The author is a German historian and novelist. Views are personal)

Comments


bottom of page