top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s...

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s Secretariat at Rashtrapati Bhavan, replied to Sarda on forwarding his complaint to the Ministry of Home Affairs for necessary action. It further stated that action taken in the matter must be conveyed directly to Sarda. “It’s a pleasant surprise indeed that the President has taken serious note of the issue of insults to the National Flag at night-clubs, pubs, lounges, sports bars and other places all over the country. The blatant mishandling of the National Flag also violates the specially laid-down provisions of the Flag Code of India,” said Sarda. He pointed out that the Tricolor is a sacred symbol and not a ‘commercial prop’ for entertainment purposes to be used by artists without disregard for the rules. “There are multiple videos, reels or photos available on social media… It's painful to view how the National Flag is being grossly misused, disrespected and even displayed at late nights or early morning hours, flouting the rules,” Sarda said. The more worrisome aspect is that such transgressions are occurring openly, repeatedly and apparently without any apprehensions for the potential consequences. This indicates serious lapses in the enforcement and supervision, but such unchecked abuse could portend dangerous signals that national symbols can be ‘trivialized and traded for profits’. He urged the President to direct the issue of stringent written guidelines with circular to all such private or commercial outlets on mandatory compliance with the Flag Code of India, conduct special awareness drives, surprise checks on such venues and regular inspections to curb the misuse of the Tricolour. Flag Code of India, 2002 Perturbed over the “perceptible lack of awareness” not only among the masses but also governmental agencies with regard to the laws, practices and conventions for displaying the National Flag as per the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, the centre had brought out the detailed 25-page Flag Code of India, 2002. The Flag Code of India has minute guidelines on the display of the Tricolour, the happy occasions when it flies high, or the sad times when it is at half-mast, the privileged dignitaries who are entitled to display it on their vehicles, etc. Certain violations attract hefty fines and/or imprisonment till three years.

‘The Great Silence’ and the Subversive Genius of Spaghetti Westerns

The Great Silence

In the winter of 1968, Sergio Corbucci’s uncompromising Western, ‘The Great Silence’, arrived like a snowstorm in the desert. A bleak masterpiece set in the snowbound frontier of Utah towards the close of the 19th century, it upended the conventions of both American and Italian Westerns with its utterly merciless vision of justice – brutal even by the violent standards of Spaghetti Westerns.


The film has become notorious for having possibly the most downbeat ending in the history of Westerns. In so doing, it has cemented Corbucci’s place as the true revolutionary of the Spaghetti Western, a genre often overshadowed by the towering presence of Sergio Leone.


When American critics first came to grips with Italian Westerns, they witnessed a radical subversion of a beloved, staple genre. For decades, Hollywood had enshrined the Western as America’s mythic foundation, an elegy to ‘Manifest Destiny’ as evinced by the films of John Ford and Howard Hawks.


But by the 1950s, Cold War paranoia had unsettled the genre. ‘High Noon’ (1952) reflected McCarthyite anxiety, while Anthony Mann’s and Budd Boetticher’s collaborations with James Stewart and Randolph Scott introduced tormented anti-heroes, reshaping the Western into stark tales of isolation and vengeance.


Then, in the summer of 1962, Akira Kurosawa’s ‘Yojimbo’ opened in Rome, and two Italian directors saw in it the seeds of a new cinematic language. Sergio Leone would win the race to reimagine the film as ‘A Fistful of Dollars’ (1964), giving Clint Eastwood his signature role. Corbucci, working in Leone’s shadow, would instead craft the fever-dream, anti-clerical, apocalyptic ‘Django’ (1966), a twisted homage to ‘Yojimbo.’


By 1968, the Spaghetti Western had become a movement, capped by Leone’s masterpiece ‘Once Upon a Time in the West’. Corbucci delivered his own masterwork in form of ‘The Great Silence.’ Shot in the frigid Italian Dolomites rather than sunbaked Almería of Leone’s films, Corbucci replaces the dust and tumbleweeds with unforgiving snow. The setting serves as a metaphor for the film’s pitiless moral climate.


Frenchman Jean-Louis Trintignant plays ‘Silence,’ a mute gunslinger wielding a Mauser whose vocal cords were mercilessly cut as a child. His adversary is ‘Loco’ - a maniacal bounty hunter played by German actor Klaus Kinski, at his most reptilian. Loco is a systematic executioner, a man who finds legal loopholes to justify his butchery. The film’s secondary antagonist, the banker Pollygut (Luigi Pistilli), a ruthless land-grabber, forces farmers into the wilderness, where Loco can legally exterminate them for profit.


In Leone’s world, survival depended on cunning, not virtue. In Corbucci’s, even cunning was not enough. Instead of the moral certainty of a John Wayne film or the mythic grandeur of Leone’s Dollars Trilogy, The Great Silence offers only nihilism. The silence of the title is both literal - its hero cannot speak- and metaphoric: it is the silence of history, the silence of the oppressed, the silence of those crushed beneath the boot of capital and power.


The film’s shocking ending, where Silence is unceremoniously gunned down along with the innocents he tried to protect, remains one of the most haunting finales in cinema. There is no last-minute salvation, no act of divine justice. Loco wins. The bounty hunters collect their rewards. The frontier is not tamed but consumed by its own brutality. It is a world where the lone hero cannot hope to triumph, only to be obliterated.


This nihilistic vision of the West was a radical departure, even within the Spaghetti Western genre. Leone’s films, for all their cynicism, still operated within a mythic framework; ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’ ended with a triumphant duel while ‘Once Upon a Time in the West’ was an elegy to the Old West. Corbucci offers no such solace.


Despite its brilliance, ‘The Great Silence’ was largely ignored outside of Europe. Prominent American critics like Roger Ebert dismissed the genre outright, failing to see its influence on American filmmakers. Yet, the lineage of The Great Silence runs deep. Sam Peckinpah’s ‘The Wild Bunch’ (1969) echoed its finale, while Quentin Tarantino paid homage in ‘The Hateful Eight’ (2015) with its snowy setting.


If the Spaghetti Western was a subversion of the American Western, then ‘The Great Silence’ was the genre’s most radical act of sabotage. Corbucci didn’t just make a great Western; he made the Western’s most devastating eulogy.

Comments


bottom of page