top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

HC denies shield to anti-CEC protesters

Court says it will intervene if specific illegalities are brought to its notice Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused to pass blanket orders against police detentions of people protesting against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, while assuring that it would take action if specific illegalities are brought before it. The court was hearing a petition filed by advocate Sagar Devre, who alleged that Mumbai police illegally detained hundreds of peaceful demonstrators,...

HC denies shield to anti-CEC protesters

Court says it will intervene if specific illegalities are brought to its notice Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused to pass blanket orders against police detentions of people protesting against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, while assuring that it would take action if specific illegalities are brought before it. The court was hearing a petition filed by advocate Sagar Devre, who alleged that Mumbai police illegally detained hundreds of peaceful demonstrators, including women and students, who took out marches in solidarity with agitations in the national capital over the weekend. Advocate Manish Tomar, representing the petitioner, urged the court to issue an interim order restraining the police from making further detentions during peaceful demonstrations. A division bench, however, declined the plea for a general stay on police action.
Court’s Assurance "We cannot pass a blanket order saying no person shall be detained. You point out if there is any such instance, we will take care. We will not permit anything wrong," the court observed. Additional Government Pleader Manish Upadhye sought time to seek instructions from the concerned authorities on the claims made in the petition. Accepting the request, the high court adjourned the matter and posted the plea for further hearing on October 19. Devre's plea sought protection of the fundamental rights of citizens, peaceful demonstrators, lawyers and others in connection with the protests in the national capital against the CEC. Terming it as an issue involving the fundamental right of people, the PIL said it was filed to protect a simple freedom of every Mumbai resident citizens – to walk freely on the city roads, to stand peacefully with others, or to stay in one’s home “without being lifted and carried away” by the police without an individual reason. It mentioned how students were allegedly picked up from their homes in connection with protest cases dating back to July 2026, which the petition said had already been quashed by the Supreme Court. Making it clear that the challenge was not against the police’s legal authority to regulate public assemblies or the political positions taken by protesters, the petitioner claimed it was to question the practice of detaining people without individualised, lawful and recorded reasons, or using previously quashed cases and past detentions against them. Invoking Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law, the plea argued that coercive action based merely on a person's association, appearance on a list, previous detention or presence in a public place would amount to arbitrary state action. It further contended that a quashed FIR could not be used as a continuing basis for hostile discriminatory treatment as a ‘permanent mark’ against a citizen since "a quashed FIR is no FIR at all”. The PIL seeks the court's declaration as 'unconstitutional' the sweeping detention of peaceful demonstrators, pedestrians and others without lawful individual justification. It seeks an independent inquiry into the alleged police excesses, preservation of CCTV footage, police records, a verified list of the detenus and framing of standard operating procedures to govern policing action during mass-protests. Long detentions The petitioner contended that the detentions went beyond the demonstrators to include bystanders and passers-by, among them women, a mother with a child and a senior citizen. Among those detained included Mahatma Gandhi’s great-grandson Tushar Arun Gandhi, his daughter Kasturi, actor Imran Khan, activists Feroze Mithiborwala, S. L. Guddi, scores of youth and students, though they were released after several hours of detention by various police stations.

The Growing Squeeze on Indian Households

2 hours ago
3 min read

Rising interest rates and 5.5 per cent inflation can put household budgets under pressure, forcing even financially disciplined families to reconsider their priorities.

Bharath, a 32-year-old salaried professional, had always believed that a steady income and disciplined savings were enough to secure his family’s future. Every month, he paid his home-loan EMI, set aside money for his parents, covered household expenses and invested a small amount for the future. However, as grocery bills, school fees and medical expenses continued to rise, his carefully planned budget came under increasing pressure. With inflation assumed at 5.5% and borrowing costs rising, Bharath faced a difficult question: how could he continue saving when the cost of living was steadily eroding his financial security?


Bharath’s situation reflects a challenge faced by many Indian households, where rising prices and higher borrowing costs can combine to reduce disposable income and delay financial goals.


Inflation and Interest Rates

Inflation gradually reduces purchasing power. Essential expenses such as food, transport, electricity, healthcare and education consume a greater share of monthly income. Even when inflation moderates, prices do not necessarily return to earlier levels; they may simply rise more slowly.


At an inflation rate of 5.5 per cent, a basket of household goods costing Rs 10,000 could cost approximately Rs 10,550 after a year, assuming the same basket experiences that rate of price increase. For families whose salaries remain unchanged, this difference can mean reduced savings or greater dependence on credit.


Higher interest rates add another layer of pressure. Borrowers with floating-rate home loans may face increased EMIs or extended repayment periods, depending on their lender’s terms. Credit card balances and personal loans can become particularly expensive, making financial recovery more difficult for already stretched households.


Calibrated Tightening Explained

Calibrated tightening refers to a measured approach to monetary policy in which interest rates or other policy settings are adjusted to contain inflation without unnecessarily weakening economic activity.


Higher borrowing costs can moderate credit demand and spending, helping ease demand-driven inflationary pressures over time. However, monetary policy operates with a lag and cannot directly resolve every cause of rising prices. Food shortages, fuel-price fluctuations, weather conditions and global supply disruptions may require additional measures.


The challenge for policymakers is to maintain price stability while considering economic growth, employment and the repayment capacity of households and businesses.


Financial Resilience Matters

For Bharath, the solution begins with reviewing his household finances rather than reacting emotionally to every market or policy announcement.


First, he should prepare a realistic monthly budget and distinguish essential expenses from discretionary purchases. Second, he should review his home-loan interest rate, outstanding principal and repayment schedule to understand the impact of any rate revision.


Maintaining an emergency fund covering three to six months of essential expenses can provide a financial cushion. Additional loan repayments may reduce long-term interest costs when affordable, but not at the expense of essential liquidity. Investments should remain aligned with financial goals, time horizons and risk tolerance.


Households should also avoid using high-interest credit to finance routine consumption. Adequate insurance and regular reviews of financial commitments can help protect savings against unexpected expenses.


The Way Forward

Bharath’s experience illustrates why inflation is not merely an economic statistic; it is a monthly financial reality. When household expenses rise alongside borrowing costs, even financially disciplined families may need to reconsider their priorities.


Calibrated monetary tightening can support price stability, but its effectiveness depends on timing, underlying inflationary pressures and complementary supply-side measures. Meanwhile, prudent borrowing, disciplined budgeting and financial literacy can help households navigate uncertainty.


Ultimately, the objective is not simply to earn more but to preserve purchasing power, protect savings and maintain financial security. For families like Bharath’s, a well-managed budget can become the first line of defence against an increasingly expensive future.


(The writer is a Chartered Accountant based in Thane. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page