top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s...

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s Secretariat at Rashtrapati Bhavan, replied to Sarda on forwarding his complaint to the Ministry of Home Affairs for necessary action. It further stated that action taken in the matter must be conveyed directly to Sarda. “It’s a pleasant surprise indeed that the President has taken serious note of the issue of insults to the National Flag at night-clubs, pubs, lounges, sports bars and other places all over the country. The blatant mishandling of the National Flag also violates the specially laid-down provisions of the Flag Code of India,” said Sarda. He pointed out that the Tricolor is a sacred symbol and not a ‘commercial prop’ for entertainment purposes to be used by artists without disregard for the rules. “There are multiple videos, reels or photos available on social media… It's painful to view how the National Flag is being grossly misused, disrespected and even displayed at late nights or early morning hours, flouting the rules,” Sarda said. The more worrisome aspect is that such transgressions are occurring openly, repeatedly and apparently without any apprehensions for the potential consequences. This indicates serious lapses in the enforcement and supervision, but such unchecked abuse could portend dangerous signals that national symbols can be ‘trivialized and traded for profits’. He urged the President to direct the issue of stringent written guidelines with circular to all such private or commercial outlets on mandatory compliance with the Flag Code of India, conduct special awareness drives, surprise checks on such venues and regular inspections to curb the misuse of the Tricolour. Flag Code of India, 2002 Perturbed over the “perceptible lack of awareness” not only among the masses but also governmental agencies with regard to the laws, practices and conventions for displaying the National Flag as per the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, the centre had brought out the detailed 25-page Flag Code of India, 2002. The Flag Code of India has minute guidelines on the display of the Tricolour, the happy occasions when it flies high, or the sad times when it is at half-mast, the privileged dignitaries who are entitled to display it on their vehicles, etc. Certain violations attract hefty fines and/or imprisonment till three years.

The Hidden Price of Privacy

There comes a point in a founder’s journey when success stops feeling celebratory and starts feeling weighty. The business is stable, the numbers are respectable, and the world sees achievement. Yet privately, many founders feel an unspoken exhaustion — the quiet awareness of what it took to get here. Years consumed by work. Relationships that adjusted without consent. Personal milestones postponed indefinitely. For some, this reality creates a strong instinct to retreat rather than reveal.


“I don’t want the world to know my story,” a founder once said. Not out of secrecy, but self-preservation. His journey was hard-won. The sacrifices were deeply personal. And he believed that speaking about them would either invite judgement or reduce the seriousness with which he was taken. The company could be marketed. The individual, he felt, should remain in the background. This belief is far more common than it appears.


Across industries, many accomplished entrepreneurs still operate on an older framework of branding promote the company, protect the person. Let the organisation speak. Let the results do the talking. Personal narratives, they believe, blur authority or invite unnecessary scrutiny. In an age where oversharing has become a currency, their resistance feels sensible. But personal branding today is not about exposure. It is about precision.


There is a crucial difference between being an open book and being intentional with one’s story. Personal branding does not require founders to relive their hardships publicly or convert sacrifice into spectacle. It requires discernment — the ability to decide what adds context and what remains private.


The problem begins when founders confuse discretion with disappearance.


In today’s business landscape, people are no longer convinced by outcomes alone. They want to understand the thinking behind decisions, the values behind leadership, and the temperament behind authority. When that context is missing, credibility remains intact — but connection weakens. The brand becomes functional, not magnetic.


This is where many founders unknowingly stall their influence. They are respected, but not deeply sought out. Trusted, but not emotionally anchored. Successful, but not truly differentiated.


Personal branding, when done right, bridges this gap. It allows founders to communicate who they are without surrendering who they protect. It shifts the focus from “what I endured” to “how I think.” From personal pain to professional perspective. From biography to belief system. This distinction matters.


Founders who remain completely silent often find themselves misunderstood. Their restraint is interpreted as distance. Their privacy reads as opacity. Over time, this affects how teams engage, how partners relate, and how markets respond. Growth continues, but influence plateaus.


Ironically, strategic personal branding often benefits founders internally before it does externally.


When leaders consciously shape their narrative, they reclaim authorship over their identity. They are no longer defined solely by numbers or outcomes. They begin to articulate their journey in a way that feels dignified, contained, and aligned. This brings clarity — and often relief. A sense that their years of sacrifice have meaning beyond financial success.


For organisations, the impact is equally powerful. A founder with a clear personal brand strengthens trust at every level. Teams align faster. Clients commit sooner. Conversations move beyond transactions into long-term relationships. The business gains not just visibility, but credibility with depth.


The need of the hour is not more storytelling. It is responsible storytelling. Founders must learn where to draw the line — what to share, what to shield, and what to shape deliberately. Personal branding today is not about being visible everywhere. It is about being understood in the right places.


Those who will lead the next phase of business growth will not be the loudest voices in the room. They will be the most intentional. The ones who understand that keeping everything private may feel safe, but sharing nothing at all quietly limits relevance.


Because in business, people don’t need to know your entire story. They need to know enough to trust your judgment, your leadership, and your intent. That balance — between privacy and presence — is where modern personal branding truly begins.


And if that is what is missing in your journey now, you can reach out to me and we shall work on this together. Book your free consultation call with me on https://www.sprect.com/pro/divyaaadvaani


(The author is a personal branding expert. She has clients from 14+ countries. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page