top of page

By:

Madhukar Mazire

12 November 2024 at 3:30:20 am

India Needs a Credit Repair Framework—Not Permanent Financial Punishment

India’s financial system has made remarkable progress in expanding credit access. Yet, there is a quiet crisis unfolding beneath the surface—millions of otherwise responsible borrowers remain locked out of formal credit due to temporary financial distress experienced during extraordinary times. The COVID-19 pandemic, followed by economic disruptions, medical emergencies, and employment instability, pushed many individuals into short-term loan defaults. These were not cases of wilful...

India Needs a Credit Repair Framework—Not Permanent Financial Punishment

India’s financial system has made remarkable progress in expanding credit access. Yet, there is a quiet crisis unfolding beneath the surface—millions of otherwise responsible borrowers remain locked out of formal credit due to temporary financial distress experienced during extraordinary times. The COVID-19 pandemic, followed by economic disruptions, medical emergencies, and employment instability, pushed many individuals into short-term loan defaults. These were not cases of wilful negligence, but of systemic shock. However, our credit reporting and scoring mechanisms continue to treat such defaults as permanent red flags, often without scope for contextual review or rehabilitation. Recently, I submitted a proposal to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Ministry of Finance urging the introduction of a structured Credit Repair and Rehabilitation Framework—one that balances credit discipline with economic realism and human fairness. Why Credit Repair Matters Now India is aiming to become a $5 trillion economy, driven by consumption, entrepreneurship, and MSME growth. Yet, credit exclusion acts as a silent brake on this ambition. When salaried professionals, small entrepreneurs, and self-employed workers are denied access to loans years after a one-time crisis default, we unintentionally push them toward informal lending, higher interest rates, or economic stagnation. A rigid “once-defaulted, always-risky” approach may protect balance sheets in the short term, but it undermines long-term credit expansion and trust in the formal system. Learning from Global Practices Globally, regulators are rethinking this approach. For instance, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has recently introduced a regulated credit repair mechanism allowing borrowers with limited, time-bound overdue records from crisis periods to restore creditworthiness. Importantly, this does not weaken credit discipline—it strengthens it by distinguishing temporary hardship from habitual default. India, with its robust digital banking and credit infrastructure, is well-positioned to design an even more nuanced and accountable framework. What a Balanced Framework Could Look Like A well-regulated credit rehabilitation policy could include: • Eligibility limited to crisis-period defaults, officially notified by regulators • Caps on overdue amount and frequency • Mandatory cooling-off periods and improved repayment behaviour • Bank-led review and approval mechanisms • Clear RBI guidelines for credit bureaus on data correction and updating Such a framework would be conditional, transparent, and auditable, ensuring no dilution of systemic risk controls. Economic Inclusion Is Economic Strength Credit systems are not merely risk filters—they are economic enablers. A borrower who recovers, repays consistently, and rebuilds financial discipline should not remain excluded indefinitely due to a past crisis. True financial inclusion is not just about opening accounts or issuing loans—it is about allowing recovery, rebuilding trust, and restoring dignity within the system. The Way Forward This is an opportune moment for RBI and the Finance Ministry to initiate a structured consultation with banks, NBFCs, credit bureaus, economists, and consumer representatives to explore a calibrated credit repair framework tailored for India. Second chances, when governed responsibly, do not weaken economies—they strengthen them. As India charts its next phase of growth, our credit policies must evolve from being purely punitive to progressively rehabilitative, without compromising prudence.

The Myths and Realities of Agricultural Income Tax

Misunderstandings about agricultural income often result in avoidable tax notices and scrutiny.

ree

Agricultural income in India has long enjoyed a special status under income tax laws. For decades, it has been widely believed that all income from agricultural land is entirely tax-free. While this is partly true, it does not reflect the full picture. Misunderstandings and persistent myths often lead taxpayers to make unintentional errors when reporting such income, resulting in tax notices, scrutiny, and avoidable stress. It is therefore essential for taxpayers to clearly understand what constitutes agricultural income and how it should be reported responsibly.


Agricultural income refers to income earned from land used for agricultural purposes in India. It includes earnings from the cultivation of crops, fruits, vegetables, grains, and similar produce, as well as rent or revenue derived from agricultural land. Income from farm buildings qualifies only when such buildings are used for agricultural operations and are located on or near the land. The law emphasises the nature of the activity rather than mere ownership of land.


The exemption of agricultural income from central income tax is rooted in India’s constitutional framework. As agriculture supports a large section of the population, the power to tax such income rests with state governments. Accordingly, the Income Tax Act exempts agricultural income from central taxation. However, exemption does not mean invisibility. Where a taxpayer is required to file a return, agricultural income must be disclosed accurately.


Several myths surround agricultural income, often misleading taxpayers. Common misconceptions include:

  • Any income from village land is tax-free

  • Sale of agricultural land is never taxable.

  • Agricultural income never attracts tax notices.


In reality, the tax treatment depends on multiple factors. For example, rural agricultural land is generally not treated as a capital asset, but urban agricultural land may attract capital gains tax on sale. The classification of land depends on population and distance from municipal limits, not just whether it is called “agricultural” locally.


Another area that creates confusion is the partial integration of agricultural income with non-agricultural income. When a taxpayer earns agricultural income along with salary, business income, or other taxable income beyond the basic exemption limit, agricultural income is considered for determining the tax rate. Although agricultural income itself remains exempt, it can increase the tax rate applicable to other income. Many taxpayers are unaware of this and are surprised when their final tax liability increases.


It is also important to understand that not all farming-related income qualifies as agricultural income. From a tax perspective, the following are not treated as agricultural income:

  • Income from dairy or poultry farming

  • Income from fisheries or animal husbandry

  • Income from processing agricultural produce beyond basic stages

  • Incorrectly showing such income as agricultural can result in penalties and legal issues.


From a chartered accountant’s point of view, most problems related to agricultural income arise not because of the law, but because of poor reporting and lack of documentation. In recent years, tax authorities have closely monitored agricultural income claims, especially when large amounts are reported without justification. Agricultural income has sometimes been misused to convert unaccounted money into tax-free income, which has increased scrutiny for everyone.


To avoid such problems, a CA would strongly advise the following practical steps:

  • Declare agricultural income honestly and realistically.

  • Ensure the income matches land size, crop type, and local yield.

  • Maintain basic documents such as land records, crop details, and sale receipts.

  • Route agricultural income through bank accounts where possible.

  • Avoid showing sudden or unusually high agricultural income without a history.

  • These simple precautions significantly reduce the chances of receiving tax notices.


Proper documentation is the strongest protection for genuine taxpayers. Records such as land ownership documents, 7/12 extracts, crop sale bills, mandi receipts, and bank statements help establish the authenticity of agricultural income. Even small farmers benefit from maintaining basic records, as they provide clarity and confidence during tax filing.


In today’s digital environment, income tax systems are increasingly data-driven. Land records, bank transactions, and market prices are easily verifiable. This makes incorrect reporting easier to detect than before. Therefore, transparency and consistency are more important than ever.


In conclusion, agricultural income is exempt from income tax to support farmers and strengthen the agricultural sector. However, this exemption comes with the responsibility of correct understanding and truthful reporting. From a professional perspective, taxpayers should view the agricultural income exemption as a benefit provided by law, not as a shortcut to avoid tax. Honest disclosure, proper documentation, and realistic reporting ensure compliance, peace of mind, and long-term protection.


Tax benefits work best when they are used with responsibility, not assumptions.


 (The writer is a Chartered Accountant based in Thane. Views personal.)

 


bottom of page