top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

BJP’s zilla parishad surge leaves Shinde Sena sidelined

Mumbai: The political friction within Maharashtra’s ruling alliance has moved from hushed corridors to a public power struggle following Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde’s recent high-profile dash to the national capital. While Shinde spent his Delhi visit in closed-door deliberations with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah—purportedly to protest being marginalised in regional power-sharing—the state BJP responded on Wednesday with a series of aggressive...

BJP’s zilla parishad surge leaves Shinde Sena sidelined

Mumbai: The political friction within Maharashtra’s ruling alliance has moved from hushed corridors to a public power struggle following Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde’s recent high-profile dash to the national capital. While Shinde spent his Delhi visit in closed-door deliberations with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah—purportedly to protest being marginalised in regional power-sharing—the state BJP responded on Wednesday with a series of aggressive manoeuvres. Instead of a reconciliation, Shinde got a reality check in which his Shiv Sena was systematically outmanoeuvred and isolated across key zilla parishads (ZPs) in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Parbhani, and Sangli. This latest sequence of events underscores a rapidly changing dynamic in Maharashtra politics. Ever since Devendra Fadnavis assumed the Chief Minister’s office in December 2024, the BJP has adopted an increasingly assertive posture. Shinde and his camp are visibly struggling to counter this dominance. The political manoeuvring in Parbhani perfectly illustrates the BJP’s new strategy. The BJP emerged as the single largest party with 24 seats. The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) secured 15 seats, followed by the Shiv Sena with five. The opposition consisted of Shiv Sena (UBT) (six seats), Congress (three seats), and one independent candidate. Guardian Minister Meghana Borikar had initially indicated a plan to seize power alongside Shinde’s Shiv Sena while keeping the NCP out. Silent Moves However, the Congress silently attempted to engineer a broad anti-BJP coalition, trying to unite the NCP, both Sena factions, and the independent member. Sensing the threat, the BJP went into a huddle with NCP leadership for a counter-strategy. Clear directives were sent to the district level. The BJP abruptly formed an alliance with the NCP. Consequently, the Shiv Sena, which had been aggressively eyeing the ZP chairperson’s post, was unceremoniously shown the door. Tight Race A similar drama unfolded in Sambhajinagar. The alliance broke down at the very last moment. Local leaders failed to reach a consensus about the chairperson post. Numbers were extremely tight. The BJP held 23 members, while the Shiv Sena commanded 22. When state-level power-sharing formulas were rejected locally, the BJP took drastic action. Leveraging assistance from the NCP, the BJP successfully engineered a split within the opposition alliance. It managed to win over the crucial votes of three UBT members and one NCP-Sharad Pawar member. On Wednesday, both the BJP and the Shiv Sena filed rival nominations for the top post. Ultimately, the BJP’s tactical cross-voting strategy prevailed. The party walked away with both the chairperson and deputy chairperson positions, leaving the Sena empty-handed. The situation in Sangli further damaged the fragile relationship between the two ruling partners. In Sangli, the NCP-SP successfully bagged the chairperson post. The Shiv Sena accused the BJP of sabotage. It was claimed that the BJP deliberately refused to back the Sena candidate and decided to field its own candidate at the eleventh hour. The last-minute entry split the votes of the ruling alliance and turned the regional equations decisively in favour of the NCP-SP.

The Narsimha Moment: India in a Shifting World Order


AI generated image
AI generated image

In this reading of the Narasimha story, Prahlad becomes a metaphor for Bharat—resilient, restrained and rising amid external pressure and internal challenge.

 

The story of Mahavatar Narsimha is widely known. Yet read differently, it resonates with the geopolitical and political currents unfolding in India and across the world. At its heart is the story of Vishnu’s Narsimha avatar and his devotee, Prahlad.


Prahlad and Bharat

As Rajnath Singh said, “Bharat ko rokne ke liye saari taaqatein prayas kar rahi hain, par Bharat nahi rukega” (“All forces are trying to stop Bharat, but Bharat will not stop growing”). In this reading, Prahlad symbolises Bharat.


Prahlad, gentle and compassionate, stands for coexistence with nature and all living beings — an echo of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam. When his gurukul teachers equate power with violence against the weak, he insists that true power lies in defending and protecting them.


India in a Hostile World

In today’s geopolitical landscape, Prahlad comes to symbolise Bharat, while China and America are cast as the forces trying to restrain it. America may speak of stronger ties, but the argument here is that it remains uneasy with India’s rise.


As India moves towards becoming the world’s third-largest economy, it faces pressure from both powers. China, more covertly, has sought leverage by restricting rare earth supplies, affecting sectors such as EVs and defence. In this reading, both mirror Hiranyakashipu, repeatedly trying to halt Prahlad’s advance.


America and Pakistan, meanwhile, are likened to Holika — seeking to burn Prahlad, only to be consumed themselves while he remains unharmed.


This mirrors what the US is doing to itself through tariffs and by providing aid to Pakistan, which is then used for attacks such as Pahalgam. In effect, it is setting fire to itself, not India.


As for China, cast here as Hiranyakashipu, the stronger of the two brothers, it is expected to try to crush Prahlad at every opportunity — and India is prepared for that challenge.


With the decline of Western power, and Trump in the most powerful office acting as an accelerant, South Asia is emerging as a new centre of power. As the world turns towards Asia, China, with its authoritarian model, is unlikely to be seen as a credible alternative. India, embodying the qualities of Prahlad, stands out as the stronger option. Despite many challenges, it remains the world’s fastest-growing major economy.


India, as Prahlad, stands for a multipolar world — not a unipolar or bipolar one. It supports smaller nations in their development. Where much of the world speaks the language of war, India speaks for peace.


Operation Sindoor is presented as a striking example of how conflict can be brought to an end — in contrast to the US record of unnecessary war. Its message is clear: those who harm India will be dealt with firmly, while those who treat it with respect — such as Israel and Russia — are met with equal respect and support.


A World Looking to India

“India is not demanding a seat at the table; it is creating its own table,” actor Denzel Washington is often quoted as saying. Whether in Brazil’s outreach to PM Modi or Canada’s decision to invite India to the G7, the message is the same: India’s global weight is growing.


When Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar welcomes PM Modi in a saree, it reflects the cultural impression India leaves on the world. When Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape touches PM Modi’s feet, it suggests that Indian culture resonates beyond national borders. And when European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen says, “When India stabilises, the world also gets stabilised,” it reflects a wider global belief in India’s rise.


For years, India was mocked as a country that “missed the bus”. But, as PM Modi said in Parliament recently, “India today drives the bus, and the world says we should not miss it.” The recent Artificial Intelligence Summit is presented as one more sign of India moving from participant to leader.


In this telling, India is the Prahlad the world is waiting for — and with the strength of its civilisation and culture, it can help make the world better.


Prahlad’s story also contains a second warning: the threat from within. His tormentors are not only external but also familial — a reminder of CDS Bipin Rawat’s “2.5-front war”, with the “0.5 front” coming from inside. In this reading, hostility to PM Modi can harden into narratives that do not merely target a leader but damage India’s image itself.


India, like Prahlad, will rise above both external pressure and internal doubt. For many, this is a defining phase in the nation’s ascent — a civilisation moving with confidence towards Viksit Bharat 2047. Jai Hind.

Comments


bottom of page