top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

The Pace And Pressure Paradox

When a founder’s speed becomes the team’s anxiety

Some workdays don’t derail because of workload. They derail because of pace. At The Workshop … the same growing design firm readers will remember from earlier chapters … the day didn’t start with tasks or priorities. It started with Rohit’s walk.


By 9:10 a.m., the team already knew what kind of day it would be.


Not from the sprint board. Not from Slack. Just from the way Rohit entered the room with fast steps, tight voice, eyes already three decisions ahead. He wasn’t upset. He wasn’t angry.


He was simply moving fast — the only speed many founders know when the stakes rise. But speed creates signals. And at The Workshop, the signal was unmistakable: “Brace yourselves.”


The Sprint That Went Sideways

Here’s what happened in the first ten minutes:

  • Aman started defending tasks no one had questioned.

  • Priya clipped her sentences short, afraid long explanations might trigger scrutiny.

  • Meera shuffled her notes, rehearsing answers no one had asked for.

  • Two interns opened Figma reflexively … even though the meeting had nothing to do with design.


Nobody said the words. But everybody understood the agenda: Survive the founder’s tempo.


This is the heart of the Pace & Pressure Paradox: Leaders feel urgency. Teams experience anxiety. Founders feel the push of customers, deadlines, and cash flow. Teams feel the push of emotion, tone, and unpredictability.


Passion Like Pressure

To Rohit, urgency meant momentum. To the team, urgency meant something might be wrong. Because when leaders operate at high emotional speed, teams don’t interpret velocity as enthusiasm … they interpret it as evaluation. In scaling companies, urgency tastes like crisis even when it’s not. What begins as passion in the founder quietly becomes pressure in the team. And the workplace becomes synchronized not to systems… but to mood.


Pattern 1: When Urgency Becomes the Default Setting

Urgency works beautifully in short bursts. But when everything is urgent, nothing feels safe.


Inside teams, this shows up as:

  • Work becoming reactive

  • Planning becoming optional

  • Delegation becoming chaotic

  • Reflection becoming a luxury

  • Calm weeks feeling suspicious


At The Workshop, urgency had become structural. And structural urgency always leads to exhaustion. Founders celebrate speed. Teams survive it. Until they can’t.

 

Pattern 2: The Mood-Driven Company

Most organisations don’t run on processes. They run on emotional weather. And the founder becomes the climate. At The Workshop, there were three seasons:

  1. Clear Skies: Rohit upbeat, team relaxed

  2. Pressure Winds: Rohit stressed, team cautious

  3. High Alert: Rohit intense, team silent


People began calibrating behavior based on Rohit’s facial expression, not the sprint plan. Speak less. Move faster. Ask nothing. Avoid friction. Stay invisible. They weren’t managing work. They were managing the boss. Once that shift occurs, performance stops being system-driven. It becomes emotion-driven. And nothing slows a company faster than emotional governance.


Pattern 3: The Aggression–Passivity Cycle

Founders rarely see this. Teams live it.


The cycle looks like this:

Phase 1: Overdrive

The team mirrors the boss’s intensity.


Phase 2: Silent Compliance

They stop pushing back. Execution becomes obedient, not intelligent.


Phase 3: Passive Breakpoint

People lose nuance. Creativity collapses. Ownership shrinks. The founder sees this slowdown and thinks, “They’ve lost energy.” The team sees the founder’s speed and thinks, “We’ve lost permission.” Both are wrong. Both are right. That’s what makes this paradox so expensive.


Case Study: The Agency Pitch Night

A creative agency we worked with experienced the same spiral. The founder burst into a pitch room at 7:45 p.m.: “We need to redo this deck. The client won’t get it.” Three designers, two strategists, one copywriter … everyone leapt into panic execution. At 11 p.m., the founder casually reversed course: “Let’s go with the old version.”


The team didn’t feel relief. They felt whiplash. Two people quietly began job-hunting the next week. It wasn’t the workload. It was the volatility.


Case Study: The Logistics Ops Escalation

In a logistics firm, a six-hour delay led to a founder shouting: “Fix it now!”


No one clarified priorities. No one asked what “fix” meant. Everyone sprinted. By morning, 42 orders were mishandled. Speed didn’t solve the problem. Speed multiplied it.


Why Scaling Makes This Paradox Stronger

At 10 people, the founder’s pace is inspiring.

At 30, it becomes confusing.

At 50, destabilizing.


Because: Speed stops being charismatic and it becomes chaotic. Teams confuse urgency with crisis. Leaders confuse anxiety with disengagement. Founders often burn out teams long before teams burn out founders. Not from workload but from emotional velocity.


The real cost isn’t fatigue. It’s strategic shallowness. Companies become excellent at reacting and terrible at thinking.

 

The Real Paradox

A leader’s pace is their superpower. Inside a team, it becomes their shadow.


What energizes a founder destabilizes a team. What feels natural to a boss feels like pressure to everyone else. That’s the Pace & Pressure Paradox:

One person’s urgency becomes everyone else’s uncertainty.


(The writer is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. She writes about the human mechanics of scaling where workplace behaviour quietly shapes business outcomes.)

 

Comments


bottom of page