top of page

By:

Shoma A. Chatterji

21 August 2024 at 10:49:40 am

The Pallbearer’s Tragedy

Three decades after its premiere, Rangakarmee’s Mayyat remains a searing theatrical indictment of caste. Rangakarmee is perhaps the only theatre group that has been producing and performing plays in Hindi in Kolkata for 50 years this year. Founded and headed by the late Usha Ganguly, it is still as active and dynamic in presenting Hindi plays mainly new and sometimes recreating for the new audience, old plays that are timeless in their content and their appeal. The amazing feature of Mayyat...

The Pallbearer’s Tragedy

Three decades after its premiere, Rangakarmee’s Mayyat remains a searing theatrical indictment of caste. Rangakarmee is perhaps the only theatre group that has been producing and performing plays in Hindi in Kolkata for 50 years this year. Founded and headed by the late Usha Ganguly, it is still as active and dynamic in presenting Hindi plays mainly new and sometimes recreating for the new audience, old plays that are timeless in their content and their appeal. The amazing feature of Mayyat is that it was first performed by Usha Ganguly and her troupe way back in 1997 and has already performed around 500 shows spanning 30 years and signifies the cross-generational reach and popularity of the play. We saw a group of absolutely new actors dedicated to Rangakarmee. Their performance defined the strict discipline, the constant workouts and rehearsals to keep mobile and flexible because the very big cast needed to be perfect in body, mind and spirit during each 45-minute performance. What does the word Maiyyat mean? It is said to have its roots in Arabic and literally, it translates as ‘dead body’ or ‘corpse.’ The play is rooted in the deep internalization among the low castes of their exploitation and torture by the Brahmins of their village. The Brahmins are proud in their gait, their body language and even in their pure form of dress with the holy thread of Brahminism proudly on display. The custom of the proud, arrogant and rude Brahmins is to choose at least one among the four untouchables to become the pall-bearer when someone of the upper-caste dies. Instead of feeling sad or insulted, the chosen untouchable feels blessed and proud for being allowed by this strange custom of becoming a fake “Brahmin” if even for one day. Lakku is one such untouchable who lives somewhere near Aurangabad and leads a miserable life of poverty with the burden of a mentally deranged, motherless son he takes care of. The pall is decorated heavily with flowers and instead of looking like a bourse, it is decorated with lots of flowers like a palanquin. Someone obviously among the Brahmins is dead and the other Brahmins draw lots to find out which untouchable will be chosen to offer his shoulder to the bourse. `When Lakku’s name comes up in the shuffling of the paper chips, he is thrilled that at least for one day, he will enjoy the ‘blessing’ of becoming a “Brahmin.” But forced to run through the village on an empty stomach and with a weak body, Lakku collapses and dies before the bourse can reach the crematorium. Now, the question is – who will carry his body and carry it to the cremation ground? The entire performance, with 23 theatre actors, originally scripted, designed and directed by Usha Ganguly, is now performed by a new young cast under the guidance, training and supervision of Amal Saha, Deepesh Rajak, and Anirudh Sarkar. It has been conceived and designed like a musical opera with every Brahmin member of the cast, including the young women, dressed traditionally in pristine white with lots of marigold garlands and a sandalwood tikka adorning their foreheads. Though there are dialogues in the performance, these are either among the leading and decisive members among the Brahmins or scoldings and threats from the Brahmins to the four members from the untouchable tribe, each one representing a different low caste. These four men, alongwith Lakku and his mentally retarded son, keep waiting eagerly in one corner of the proscenium for the results of the lots to be drawn. They hug each other for joy when their names are announced and Lakku specially is thrilled with the responsibility of being pallbearer and becoming a Brahmin for just one night. Whose corpse is being carried in the bourse is not important. What is important is who are the pall bearers? At least, the Brahmins are not. What one carries home after watching a performance-play like Mayyat is the marvellous synchronization of the entire female cast wandering right around the proscenium space singing songs in complete harmony with not a note of error and the Brahmin men discussing, arguing and quarrelling over not how the corpse will be cremated but which low-caste man will become the pallbearer for one night. The bottom-line is caste is a continuous, historical evil. But should it remain so? (The writer is a noted film scholar. Views personal.)

The Panama Canal: A Flashpoint in U.S.-China Rivalry

Updated: Feb 10, 2025

A century-old waterway, a modern-day conflict—why the Panama Canal still shapes global power dynamics.

Panama Canal

The Panama Canal, a crucial artery of global trade linking the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, has long-held strategic and economic significance. Today, it finds itself at the centre of escalating U.S.-China tensions, as both powers vie for influence over this vital waterway. What makes the canal so pivotal, and why has it become a geopolitical battleground?


Panama, a transcontinental nation linking North and South America, is bordered by Costa Rica to the west, Colombia to the southeast, the Caribbean Sea to the north, and the Pacific Ocean to the south. Its strategic location has long made it a hub for international trade and military operations.


Formerly a Spanish colony, Panama gained independence in 1821 and joined Gran Colombia, a union with Nueva Granada, Ecuador, and Venezuela. After Gran Colombia dissolved in 1831, Panama remained part of Nueva Granada, which later became Colombia. In 1903, with U.S. support, Panama seceded from Colombia, paving the way for the construction of the Panama Canal by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, completed in 1914.


The Panama Canal was initially under American control until the Torrijos–Carter Treaties of 1977 set the stage for its eventual transfer to Panama. By December 31, 1999, Panama assumed full sovereignty over the canal, marking a significant shift in its administration.


The treaty consists of two key agreements: the Panama Canal Treaty and the Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal, commonly known as the Neutrality Treaty.


The Neutrality Treaty ensures that the Panama Canal remains permanently neutral and open to vessels of all nations on equal terms. It also grants both the United States and Panama the right to defend the canal against any threats to its neutrality and secure its uninterrupted operation.


China’s Growing Influence

In recent years, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has extended its reach into Latin America, with Panama becoming a notable participant. Chinese investments have flowed into various sectors, including significant infrastructure projects. Notably, Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings operates ports at both ends of the canal, enhancing China’s logistical footprint in the region.


In a major diplomatic shift in 2017, Panama also became the first and only Latin American country to cut all diplomatic ties with Taiwan and accept the “One China Policy”.


U.S. Concerns

The United States has expressed apprehension regarding China’s expanding presence near the canal. It argues that such influence could compromise the canal’s neutrality and pose risks to global shipping routes and military logistics.


In his inaugural address on 20th January, US President Donald Trump criticised China’s involvement in the Panama Canal and declared the USA’s intention to reclaim control over this strategic waterway. Shortly thereafter, the new US Secretary of State Marco Rubio embarked on his first official foreign trip to Panama, where he met with Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino. Following their discussions, President Mulino announced that Panama would not renew its participation in China’s Belt and Road Initiative when the current agreement expires in 2026. Mulino also claimed that no military threat was posed over the canal’s sovereignty.


Panama asserts full sovereignty over the canal and its neutral operation, as required by international treaties.


However, public opinion is divided. Many see the canal as a symbol of national pride, while others criticise government management and foreign partnerships. Some also share U.S. concerns about growing foreign influence, particularly from China, and its impact on Panama’s sovereignty.


International Implications

The Panama Canal is a vital artery for global trade, handling around 14,000 vessels annually. Geopolitical tensions could disrupt operations, impact supply chains, and prompt shipping companies to seek alternative routes, raising costs and transit times.


Rising U.S.-China tensions over the canal could also reshape Latin America’s political and economic landscape. Countries may have to balance Chinese investments while maintaining strong ties to the U.S., and navigating a complex web of alliances and dependencies.


From the U.S. perspective, ensuring the canal’s neutrality and efficiency requires eliminating Chinese influence in the region. However, as the U.S.-China trade war deepens into a broader strategic rivalry, the canal could become a major flashpoint. Given its role in global maritime trade, any disruption would have significant economic consequences.


A conflict over the canal could severely impact trade and security, causing shipping delays, rising costs, and supply chain disruptions. Additionally, a standoff between two major powers could destabilise Latin America, triggering wider geopolitical repercussions.


The Panama Canal remains crucial to global commerce, making its control internationally significant. Current tensions highlight the complex interplay of national interests, economic ambitions, and strategy. As the situation unfolds, the international community must seek a resolution that upholds the canal’s neutrality and ensures free trade flow.


(The author is a foreign affairs expert. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page