The Robot Dog That Barked Too Loudly

A borrowed machine exposed the gulf between technological ambition and institutional care during the AI Impact Summit.

India wants to be taken seriously as an artificial-intelligence power. That was the message delivered with customary confidence by Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the inauguration of the AI Impact Summit, a gathering impressive on paper: 20 heads of state, 60 ministers and hundreds of global AI executives. The ambition was to announce India’s arrival as a leader in the technologies of the future. While several significant things have occurred at the summit, a side incident snowballed into a case study in how small failures in form of poor vetting, loose claims and administrative haste can puncture a grand narrative.

The controversy broke on the summit’s second day after an interview on DD News. At a stall run by the Noida-based Galgotias University, a faculty member claimed that two eye-catching exhibits, one a four-legged robot dog and a football-playing drone, had been developed “from scratch” at the university’s new AI centre of excellence. The centre, inaugurated earlier this month with partners including Nvidia and Tata Technologies, was described as a Rs. 350-crore investment, the largest AI outlay by any private university in India.

Internet users quickly pointed out that the robot dog, branded ‘Orion’, closely resembled the Unitree Go2, a commercially available Chinese product, and that the drone had South Korean origins. Very soon, the indigenous innovation claim touted by Galgotias University collapsed on scrutiny as it was revealed that the dog was indeed a Chines product.

The embarrassment escalated because the government had amplified the claim. Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, overseeing the summit, had briefly promoted the robot dog on social media before deleting his post once doubts surfaced. A further twist came when an account called ‘China Pulse’ highlighted the dog’s origins, only for some Indian users to allege that the account itself was a foreign propaganda operation. The argument over who exposed the truth soon eclipsed the truth itself.

For Galgotias University, the damage was immediate. Their stall was immediately vacated. A hurried press statement apologised, describing the professor as “ill-informed” and claiming she had been instructed not to speak to the media – a lame explanation that raised more questions than it answered. The episode also revived older doubts about the institution’s credibility, including legal troubles involving members of the founding family in 2014 over alleged forgery and financial defaults.

Lost amid the noise was a quieter, more inconvenient fact that India does have a home-grown robot dog. xTerra Robotics, a start-up founded in 2023 at IIT Kanpur, showcased ‘Svan 2,’ India’s first four-legged commercial robot, at the same exhibition. It attracted far less attention than the imported dog that stole the limelight and then bit its handlers.

The wider implications go beyond one university or one minister’s deleted tweet. India’s global pitch rests heavily on Atmanirbhar Bharat (self-reliance) in manufacturing and technology. Displaying a Chinese robot at a summit meant to trumpet indigenous capability weakens that message, especially at a moment when India is positioning itself as a geopolitical and technological alternative in Asia.

The episode also hints at a deeper unease within India’s innovation ecosystem. Too often, incentives reward visibility over verification and announcements over outcomes. Universities, start-ups and even ministries feel pressure to demonstrate instant breakthroughs, even when the slower work of genuine research and development would serve better. This results in a culture in which borrowed hardware and inflated claims slip too easily into official showcases.

The fiasco also exposed a basic governance failure. Stalls at a high-profile international summit were allotted without rigorous vetting of claims, leaving the Information Technology Ministry scrambling after the fact. In a world where reputations are made and unmade online in hours, such oversight is costly.

None of this negates India’s genuine strengths in software, talent or start-ups. But it underlines a harsher truth: credibility in technology is built not by slogans or spectacle, but by accuracy, verification and institutional discipline. A robot dog may seem trivial. Yet when it barks falsely on a global stage, it can drown out a far bigger message.