top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

The RSS’s Role in Our Freedom Struggle

Updated: Oct 21, 2024



The RSS’s Role in Our Freedom Struggle

The Indian independence struggle, often narrated through the lives of a few prominent leaders, is only a partial story. But emerging documents now reveal a more complete picture. Kalyan Kumar De's book ‘Netaji’ reveals British archive information linking public outrage over INA trials and the naval rebellion to the British's decision to leave.

Few are aware that the first revolt for independence was led by the Maruthu Pandiyar brothers at Tamil Nadi in 1801. Similarly, the contributions of figures like Subramanya Bharathi, VO Chidambaram Pillai, Kumarswamy Mudaliar, Birsa Munda are rarely mentioned in favour of more widely recognised leaders like Gandhi and Nehru.

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has received little recognition. Founded in 1925, the RSS focused on spiritual patriotism rooted in India’s Hindu culture, inspired by Bankimchandra, Lokmanya Tilak, and Savarkar. Dr. Hedgewar advocated for nationalism based on Bharat’s cultural and geographical identity.

He initially revolted against the British during his school days. While studying medicine in Kolkata, he joined the Anusheelan Samiti and led against the British-imposed restrictions on Indian doctors. As a Congress joint secretary, his advocacy for ‘complete freedom’ was rejected in favour of limited self-rule.  His support for the non-cooperation movement led to a nine-month prison term.

Realising that India’s divisions-caste, orthodoxy, parochial conflicts, and language, hindered the unity required to overthrow the British.  After conferring with leaders of Hindu Mahasabha and Congress, he established a new organisation apart from politics, the RSS.

The original RSS pledged to work with complete commitment for the freedom of the Hindu Rashtra, that is, Bharat. Dr. Hedgewar envisioned an all-India organisation prepared to fight for freedom after WWII. Before his passing, he regretted not completing this task by 1940 to seize this historic moment. His vision became clearer when we see that the Quit India movement was launched in 1942 and the INA was formed.

The second RSS sarsanghchaalak, Shri Guruji, worked to make the RSS a strong all-India organisation. At this time, the Quit India came to the fore, and RSS swayamsevaks participated in the movement.

Since RSS's biggest and most powerful participation was in Vidarbha, two towns, Chimur and Ashti, saw a takeover of government with ‘Patri Sarkar.’ Multiple Swayamsevak were either shot, hanged, or imprisoned. The RSS further supported the Quit India movement by providing shelter and legal assistance in fighting cases of satyagrahis and these leaders.

When independence was declared, RSS volunteers protected the people of Punjab and Sindh and assisted many of them in escaping from the newly formed Pakistan. Hundreds of swayamsevaks sacrificed their lives, families, and businesses. 

Even before the Indian army marched into Jammu and Kashmir after the signing of the treaty of accession, it was the RSS that stood with the Dogra army and later the Indian army to provide support. They aided in the construction of roads, bridges, and runways; and picked up ammunition dropped by air force planes.

As unbelievable as it may sound, there were small colonies in India even after independence. Pondicherry was liberated with a treaty with the French in 1954. Dadra Nagar Haveli was liberated by RSS swayamsevaks led by Vinyakrao Apte, Sanghchaalak of Pune, in 1954.  Thousands of swayamsevaks liberated Goa under the leadership of Jagannathrao Joshi. Rajbhau Mahkal from Indore was shot through the eye and lost his life, holding the Tricolour aloft.

In my book “Sangh & Swaraj”, I have included the names of 33 swayamsevaks who lost their lives defending Hindus in the Amritsar riots. Other books like “Now it Can be Told”, “Jammu Kashmir ki Ankahi Kahani”, and “Jyoti Jala Nij Pran ki” must be read to understand the contribution of the RSS, before and after Independence.    

Post World War II, the British Raj decided to give up on Bharat as they realised the rising anger against INA trials and the Naval rebellion. I do not negate the sacrifices of Indians under the non-violent path of freedom struggle, but request historians and others to take a balanced view and give credit where it is due. We all pay our respects to all the freedom fighters, whether sants, patriotic sadhusjanajaati leaders, revolutionaries, Congress, or others like the RSS. To truly understand our struggle for independence, we must revisit it with the depth and nuance it deserves, as the venerable historian R.C. Majumdar began, and finally give voice to the silenced narratives that shaped our nation.

Comments


bottom of page