top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

High-stakes chess beneath the surface

BJP Candidates coming out after filing their nomination for the upcoming Legislative Council Polls from Vidhan Bhavan in Mumbai on Thursday. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Typically, when a ruling coalition enjoys a formidable and comfortable majority, elections to the Rajya Sabha and the State Legislative Council are quiet, predictable affairs. They are often viewed as mere formalities, rarely capturing the public imagination or dominating front-page headlines. Historically, these indirect...

High-stakes chess beneath the surface

BJP Candidates coming out after filing their nomination for the upcoming Legislative Council Polls from Vidhan Bhavan in Mumbai on Thursday. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Typically, when a ruling coalition enjoys a formidable and comfortable majority, elections to the Rajya Sabha and the State Legislative Council are quiet, predictable affairs. They are often viewed as mere formalities, rarely capturing the public imagination or dominating front-page headlines. Historically, these indirect elections only become newsworthy under specific conditions: either the ruling coalition is plagued by internal fissures, or the opposition is too fragmented to put up a united front. In Maharashtra, however, the political landscape remains highly volatile. Recently, the Rajya Sabha elections became the center of intense media scrutiny, and over the past week, the Legislative Council polls followed suit. Although all ten candidates—nine from the ruling alliance and one from the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—are now set to be elected unopposed, the intricate backroom maneuvers that led to this truce kept the state’s political circles buzzing. Interestingly, the reason for this heightened news value can be traced to both a subtle tug-of-war within the ruling combine and a visibly weakened opposition. Shifting Strategy The maneuvering within the opposition ranks has been particularly telling. A major focal point of the election buildup was the anticipated candidacy of Shiv Sena (UBT) Chief Uddhav Thackeray. After generating considerable hype and speculation about a potential return to the legislature, Thackeray ultimately chose to withdraw from the electoral fray. This sudden pullback forced a rapid recalibration within the MVA. Initially, the Congress party had adopted an aggressive posture, declaring its intention to field a candidate if Thackeray decided against contesting. However, following closed-door deliberations with Shiv Sena (UBT) leadership, the Congress quietly backed down. Why the state Congress leadership so readily acquiesced to this sudden change in strategy, sacrificing a potential seat, remains a mystery and a subject of intense debate among political observers. On the other side of the aisle, the ruling Mahayuti coalition maximized this electoral opportunity to consolidate its political base, reward loyalists, and balance complex regional equations. The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) strategically paved the way for the political rehabilitation of former Congress legislator Zishan Siddique by nominating him to the Legislative Council. This calculated move introduces a prominent new Muslim face for the party, likely intended to fill the leadership vacuum in Mumbai left by veteran leader Nawab Malik. Meanwhile, Chief Minister Eknath Shinde used his nominations to send a definitive message about the premium he places on loyalty. By securing another term for Dr. Neelam Gorhe, Shinde demonstrated that those who stood by his faction would be adequately rewarded. Furthermore, by bringing Vidarbha strongman Bachchu Kadu into the fold, Shinde has attempted to anchor his party’s future and expand its footprint in a region predominantly controlled by his senior alliance partner, the BJP. The Bharatiya Janata Party, playing its characteristic long game, meticulously ensured that its list of six candidates struck the perfect organizational, social, and political balance. Battle for LOP Despite these broader alliance strategies, the most consequential nomination in this electoral cycle is arguably that of Ambadas Danve. Barely six months after completing his tenure in the Upper House and stepping down from the prestigious post of Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Council, Danve has been nominated once again by the Shiv Sena (UBT). With his return to the house, there is a strong possibility that he will reclaim his former post. This specific development highlights a much deeper crisis within the Congress. Following Danve’s brief retirement, the Congress had naturally emerged as the largest opposition party in the Upper House. This mathematical advantage theoretically paved the way for their Kolhapur strongman, Satej “Banti” Patil, to lay claim to the Leader of the Opposition’s chair. However, the sudden defection of Congress MLC Pradnya Satav, who switched loyalties to the BJP, severely dented the party’s numbers. Her departure brought the Congress’s strength in the house just below that of the Shiv Sena (UBT). Stripped of its numerical superiority overnight, the Congress was relegated to being a mute spectator, unable to assert its rightful claim. Internal Dissent This series of tactical defeats has triggered palpable frustration within the Congress’s state unit. One senior Congress leader, speaking on the condition of anonymity, expressed deep disappointment with the state leadership’s inability to protect the party’s interests. “Everyone has personal political ambitions, but leaders must learn the ways to collectively move ahead and strategize,” the leader remarked, attributing the party’s current stagnation in Maharashtra to this lack of cohesive vision. In short, these Legislative Council elections have delivered one message loud and clear: even when everything appears calm and stable on the surface, the relentless machinery of politics continues to churn behind the scenes. No political player in Maharashtra can afford to rest assured or sit idle under the illusion that there are no major state elections until 2029.

The Sage of the Sahyadris

Professor Madhav Gadgil: The man who taught India to listen to the mountains

Prof. Madhav Gadgil (1942–2026)
Prof. Madhav Gadgil (1942–2026)

Mumbai: With the passing of Professor Madhav Gadgil, India has lost more than a world-class ecologist; it has lost its environmental conscience. A man who bridged the ivory towers of Harvard and the rugged rain-shadow forests of the Western Ghats, Gadgil spent his life proving that science is meaningless if it does not serve the soil and the people who toil upon it.


Born in Pune in 1942, Madhav Dhananjaya Gadgil was destined for a life of the mind, but his heart belonged to the wilderness. After a brilliant academic start, he earned his Ph.D. from Harvard University, where he developed foundational theories in mathematical ecology. Yet, unlike many of his contemporaries who remained in the West, Gadgil returned to India with a singular mission: to understand the intricate tapestry of tropical biology.


In 1983, he founded the Centre for Ecological Sciences (CES) at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. Under his leadership, the CES became a global hub for research, blending rigorous quantitative data with traditional field biology. He was a pioneer in "People’s Biodiversity Registers," a radical concept that recognized that a forest dweller often knows more about a medicinal herb than a laboratory scientist.


A polyglot, he always preferred to converse with the people in their own languages – preferably mother tongues. That also always remained his stand as a Science Communicator. He fondly wrote lengthy articles for popular newspapers explaining the nuances of technical scientific issues that affected people’s lives in Marathi. He also authored several books.


Though his scientific honours were many—including the Padma Bhushan and the Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement—it was his role as the Chairman of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) that defined his public legacy.


In 2011, he submitted what became known as the Gadgil Report. It was a landmark document that classified the entire Western Ghats (the Sahyadris) into three levels of ecological sensitivity. Gadgil did not just call for a ban on mining and dams; he called for "Grassroots Democracy." He argued that the local Gram Sabhas, not bureaucrats in Delhi or Mumbai, should have the final say on developmental projects.


While the report was initially sidelined by various state governments as "anti-development," the devastating floods and landslides that later ravaged Kerala and Karnataka proved his warnings were not just scientific, but prophetic. He became the "Saviour of the Sahyadris" not by choice, but by the undeniable accuracy of his vision.


Prof. Gadgil was also a key architect of The Biological Diversity Act of 2002. The legislation ensured it included provisions for the People’s Biodiversity Registers (PBRs).


Professor Madhav Gadgil’s intellectual footprint is vast, spanning over five decades of ground breaking research and public advocacy. His work is characterized by a unique ability to blend high-level mathematical modelling with deeply human-centric field studies. His approach always remained multi-disciplinary. He never looked at a forest just as a collection of trees; he always looks at the soil quality, the rainfall data, the history of the local tribes, and the current economic pressures simultaneously.


Prof. Gadgil’s literary contributions serve as the intellectual foundation of Indian environmentalism, blending historical depth with field-based scientific rigor. His seminal work, This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India (1992), co-authored with Ramachandra Guha, redefined Indian history by tracing the evolution of resource use from hunter-gatherer societies to the "profligate" exploitation of the British Raj. In Ecology and Equity (1995), he introduced a sociologically grounded framework that divided Indian society into "Omnivores," "Ecosystem People," and "Ecological Refugees," arguing that environmental degradation is fundamentally an issue of social injustice. His collection of essays, Ecological Journeys (2005), bridges the gap between the science of biodiversity and the politics of conservation, while his final memoir, A Walk Up The Hill: Living with People and Nature (2023), offers a deeply personal synthesis of his eighty-year journey, emphasizing the "People’s Biodiversity Registers" and his controversial but prophetic warnings about the Western Ghats. Together, these works shift the focus of conservation from exclusionary state-controlled parks to a democratic, community-led model where ecological limits and social justice are inseparable.


Gadgil’s academic output (over 250 papers) laid the groundwork for modern tropical ecology and community-based conservation.


A Civilisational Vision

Gadgil’s scholarship was never merely technical. He viewed sustainability as a civilisational challenge. He often spoke of the "Omnivores" (the urban elite who consume resources from afar), the "Ecosystem People" (the rural poor who depend on local resources), and the "Ecological Refugees" (those displaced by development).


His life was a masterclass in intellectual integrity. Whether he was walking through a sacred grove in Maharashtra or testifying before a high-level committee, his voice remained steady, backed by data and driven by moral clarity. He lived simply, thought deeply, and never shied away from speaking truth to power.


An Enduring Legacy

Professor Gadgil leaves behind a generation of ecologists who view the forest not as a "resource," but as a living system. He taught us that social justice and ecological health are two sides of the same coin.


As the mists roll over the Sahyadri peaks today, they shroud a land that is a little lonelier for his absence. But his work remains—in the People’s Biodiversity Registers, in the protected corridors of the Ghats, and in the hearts of every activist who stands up for a tree, a river, or a village.

Comments


bottom of page