top of page

By:

Rahul Kulkarni

30 March 2025 at 3:32:54 pm

The Boundary Collapse

When kindness becomes micromanagement It started with a simple leave request.   “Hey, can I take Friday off? Need a personal day,” Meera messaged Rohit. Rohit replied instantly:   “Of course. All good. Just stay reachable if anything urgent comes up.”   He meant it as reassurance. But the team didn’t hear reassurance. They heard a rule.   By noon, two things had shifted inside The Workshop:   Meera felt guilty for even asking. Everyone else quietly updated their mental handbook: Leave is...

The Boundary Collapse

When kindness becomes micromanagement It started with a simple leave request.   “Hey, can I take Friday off? Need a personal day,” Meera messaged Rohit. Rohit replied instantly:   “Of course. All good. Just stay reachable if anything urgent comes up.”   He meant it as reassurance. But the team didn’t hear reassurance. They heard a rule.   By noon, two things had shifted inside The Workshop:   Meera felt guilty for even asking. Everyone else quietly updated their mental handbook: Leave is allowed… but not really. This is boundary collapse… when a leader’s good intentions unintentionally blur the limits that protect autonomy and rest. When care quietly turns into control Founders rarely intend to micromanage.   What looks like control from the outside often starts as care from the inside. “Let me help before something breaks.” “Let me stay involved so we don’t lose time.” “Loop me in… I don’t want you stressed.” Supportive tone.   Good intentions.   But one invisible truth defines workplace psychology: When power says “optional,” it never feels optional.
So when a client requested a revision, Rohit gently pinged:   “If you’re free, could you take a look?” Of course she logged in.   Of course she handled it.   And by Monday, the cultural shift was complete: Leave = location change, not a boundary.   A founder’s instinct had quietly become a system. Pattern 1: The Generous Micromanager Modern micromanagement rarely looks aggressive. It looks thoughtful :   “Let me refine this so you’re not stuck.” “I’ll review it quickly.”   “Share drafts so we stay aligned.”   Leaders believe they’re being helpful. Teams hear:   “You don’t fully trust me.” “I should check with you before finishing anything.”   “My decisions aren’t final.” Gentle micromanagement shrinks ownership faster than harsh micromanagement ever did because people can’t challenge kindness. Pattern 2: Cultural conditioning around availability In many Indian workplaces, “time off” has an unspoken footnote: Be reachable. Just in case. No one says it directly.   No one pushes back openly.   The expectation survives through habit: Leave… but monitor messages. Rest… but don’t disconnect. Recover… but stay alert. Contrast this with a global team we worked with: A designer wrote,   “I’ll be off Friday, but available if needed.” Her manager replied:   “If you’re working on your off-day, we mismanaged the workload… not the boundary.”   One conversation.   Two cultural philosophies.   Two completely different emotional outcomes.   Pattern 3: The override reflex Every founder has a version of this reflex.   Whenever Rohit sensed risk, real or imagined, he stepped in: Rewriting copy.   Adjusting a design.   Rescoping a task.   Reframing an email. Always fast.   Always polite.   Always “just helping.” But each override delivered one message:   “Your autonomy is conditional.” You own decisions…   until the founder feels uneasy.   You take initiative…   until instinct replaces delegation.   No confrontation.   No drama.   Just quiet erosion of confidence.   The family-business amplification Boundary collapse becomes extreme in family-managed companies.   We worked with one firm where four family members… founder, spouse, father, cousin… all had informal authority. Everyone cared.   Everyone meant well.   But for employees, decision-making became a maze: Strategy approved by the founder.   Aesthetics by the spouse.   Finance by the father. Tone by the cousin.   They didn’t need leadership.   They needed clarity.   Good intentions without boundaries create internal anarchy. The global contrast A European product team offered a striking counterexample.   There, the founder rarely intervened mid-stream… not because of distance, but because of design:   “If you own the decision, you own the consequences.” Decision rights were clear.   Escalation paths were explicit.   Authority didn’t shift with mood or urgency. No late-night edits.   No surprise rewrites.   No “quick checks.”   No emotional overrides. As one designer put it:   “If my boss wants to intervene, he has to call a decision review. That friction protects my autonomy.” The result:   Faster execution, higher ownership and zero emotional whiplash. Boundaries weren’t personal.   They were structural .   That difference changes everything. Why boundary collapse is so costly Its damage is not dramatic.   It’s cumulative.   People stop resting → you get presence, not energy.   People stop taking initiative → decisions freeze.   People stop trusting empowerment → autonomy becomes theatre.   People start anticipating the boss → performance becomes emotional labour.   People burn out silently → not from work, but from vigilance.   Boundary collapse doesn’t create chaos.   It creates hyper-alertness, the heaviest tax on any team. The real paradox Leaders think they’re being supportive. Teams experience supervision.   Leaders assume boundaries are obvious. Teams see boundaries as fluid. Leaders think autonomy is granted. Teams act as though autonomy can be revoked at any moment. This is the Boundary Collapse → a misunderstanding born not from intent, but from the invisible weight of power. Micromanagement today rarely looks like anger.   More often,   it looks like kindness without limits. (Rahul Kulkarni is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. He patterns the human mechanics of scaling where workplace behavior quietly shapes business outcomes. Views personal.)

The Umpire Who Stood Tall in Cricket’s Golden Age

ree

Harold Dennis “Dickie” Bird, the unmistakable figure in white who brought a touch of Barnsley banter to the world’s cricket grounds, has died at the age of 92. He passed away peacefully on September 22, 2025, at his home in the Yorkshire town where he was born, surrounded by family and echoes of the cheers that followed him for decades. Bird’s death marks the end of an era for English cricket, one defined not just by the finger raised in judgment but by the infectious joy he infused into the game. As tributes poured in from Lord’s to Lahore, Geoffrey Boycott, his lifelong Yorkshire comrade, summed it up: “Dickie didn’t just umpire; he entertained. We’ll miss him, even if he did call me out once or twice.”


Born on April 19, 1933, in a modest terraced house on Church Lane in Barnsley, West Riding of Yorkshire, Bird grew up in the shadow of the coal pits that powered the industrial north. The eldest of three children to James Harold Bird, a coal miner, and Ethel (née Smith), a homemaker, young Harold—soon nicknamed “Dickie” by schoolmates for his cheeky grin—knew hardship early. The family relocated to the New Lodge estate amid slum clearances when he was two, a move that instilled in him the grit of working-class resilience. Failing his 11-plus exam in 1944, he attended Raley Secondary Modern School, leaving at 15 to toil briefly in the mines. “It weren’t for me,” he later recalled with a chuckle. “Too dark down there—no room for a cricket bat.” Instead, sport became his escape. A promising footballer, Bird’s knee injury dashed dreams of professional soccer, redirecting his passion to cricket, the village green’s gentlemanly pursuit.


Bird’s playing days flickered brightly but briefly. Signing with Yorkshire in 1956, he navigated the cutthroat opening slot amid nerves and fierce competition from the likes of Ken Taylor. His maiden County Championship century—a gritty 181 not out against Glamorgan in 1959—earned plaudits, but inconsistency and that nagging knee saw him loaned to Leicestershire in 1960. There, he blossomed momentarily, amassing over 1,000 runs in his debut season, including a ton against the touring South Africans. Yet, by 1964, after 93 first-class matches averaging a modest 20.71—with just two centuries and 14 fifties—the injuries won. Retiring at 31, Bird turned coach, guiding talents at Paignton and Plymouth College, and even venturing to Johannesburg. Club cricket with future stars like Michael Parkinson and Boycott forged bonds that outlasted his batting average. “I never scored a run for England,” he quipped in later years, “but I made up for it standing at the other end.”


Umpiring, however, was where Bird truly flourished, transforming from journeyman batsman to global icon over 28 years. Qualifying for county games in 1970, he debuted in Tests three years later at Headingley—his spiritual home—standing with Charlie Elliott for England versus New Zealand. An innings victory for the hosts set the tone for a career that would see him officiate 66 Tests (a world record until 2009), 69 ODIs, seven Women’s ODIs, and three Cricket World Cup finals. His tally included a then-record 54 Tests in England and 15 at Lord’s, the cathedral of cricket.


The best moments? They read like a highlight reel of cricket’s eccentric soul. In 1975, Bird stood in the inaugural World Cup final at Lord’s, where West Indies clinched a 17-run thriller over Australia amid a joyous pitch invasion that nearly swept him off his feet. “Fans everywhere—chasing Viv Richards like he was the last bus home,” he laughed in his autobiography. Eight years later, in 1983, he refereed India’s seismic upset of the same foes at the same venue, kapil Dev’s men etching history as Bird’s finger stayed resolutely neutral in a match that redefined underdogs. His third final came in 1992 at Melbourne, Pakistan’s triumph under Imran Khan unfolding under his watchful eye amid the inaugural use of colored clothing and white balls. Then there was the 1980 Centenary Test at Lord’s, a nostalgic clash between England and Australia exactly 100 years on from the first. Bird and partner David Constant braved a waterlogged outfield—despite blue skies—forcing a three-day washout that sparked MCC member mutiny. Yet, in 1988 at Headingley, a biblical flood turned the outfield into a lake; Bird’s calm call to halt play amid rising waters became folklore, players rowing imaginary boats in jest.


(The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page