top of page

By:

Bharati Dubey

17 May 2026 at 1:38:10 am

Raja Shivaji sparks a new era for Marathi cinema

Mumbai: As Raja Shivaji marches steadily towards the Rs 100 crore mark, the film has reignited debate around the future of the Marathi film industry. Having already crossed Rs 80 crore at the Indian box office, the historical drama is now only the second Marathi film after Sairat to achieve the milestone. Its success has raised a larger question within the trade: can a major blockbuster finally attract sustained investment into Marathi cinema, an industry often marked by cycles of growth and...

Raja Shivaji sparks a new era for Marathi cinema

Mumbai: As Raja Shivaji marches steadily towards the Rs 100 crore mark, the film has reignited debate around the future of the Marathi film industry. Having already crossed Rs 80 crore at the Indian box office, the historical drama is now only the second Marathi film after Sairat to achieve the milestone. Its success has raised a larger question within the trade: can a major blockbuster finally attract sustained investment into Marathi cinema, an industry often marked by cycles of growth and slowdown? Much of the buzz surrounding the film stems from the support it received from prominent Hindi film stars, several of whom reportedly came on board to back the project and the industry. Trade analyst Girish Wankhede believes the film’s biggest achievement lies in the scale of collaboration it represents. “The real strength of Raja Shivaji lies in its creative ensemble star cast, which Riteish Deshmukh successfully brought together. By roping in heavyweight Hindi stars like Abhishek Bachchan, Sanjay Dutt, and Salman Khan, the film showcases the immense combined value of cross-industry collaboration. This strong gesture of Hindi cinema’s biggest names extending full support to a Marathi project has created a powerful impression, generating tremendous curiosity and respect for Marathi cinema among audiences, investors, and other industries. It underscores how Marathi films can now command pan-Indian attention and star power,” he says. At the same time, Wankhede feels it may still be premature to call the film a runaway commercial success given its production scale and costs. “What is heartening is the visible new energy and creative fuel that Riteish Deshmukh has infused into Marathi cinema. With him at the helm of affairs, the film looks strong and polished, and this momentum, further amplified by the star support, is already drawing serious attention from investors who were earlier hesitant about the regional space,” he adds. Producer Suniel Wadhwa, Co-Founder and Director of Karmic Films, says the film’s performance could play an important role in rebuilding investor confidence in theatrical cinema. “The success of Raja Shivaji could significantly improve investor confidence in theatrical cinema, especially at a time when many non-film investors have become cautious about the sector. If the film succeeds as a large-scale theatrical event rather than just an opening weekend phenomenon, it will reinforce the belief that culturally rooted Indian stories still possess massive commercial potential across regions and demographics,” he says. However, Wadhwa points out that the industry continues to face deep structural challenges. “One of the biggest is the shortage of true theatrical stars who can create urgency for audiences to step into cinemas. Streaming has created visibility, but not necessarily ticket-selling mythology. At the same time, India remains heavily under-screened, and even strong films often struggle with inadequate show slots, limited showcasing windows, and overcrowded release calendars. Many films today are judged within the first 48–72 hours, leaving little room for organic word-of-mouth growth,” he says. According to him, the theatrical business is evolving rather than disappearing. “Audiences are now reserving cinema outings for event-driven experiences — spectacle, emotion, mythology, action, horror-comedy, and culturally resonant storytelling. Films that can create that collective viewing urgency will continue to attract both audiences and serious investment capital,” he adds. The Marathi film industry has witnessed a mixed year so far. More than two dozen films have released, but only a handful — including Raja Shivaji, Kranti Vidyalay Marathi Madhyam, Aga Aga Sunbai Mahnatay Sasubai, and Super Duper — have performed strongly at the box office. Veteran journalist Dilip Thakur believes Marathi cinema has already begun regaining momentum after the slowdown caused by the pandemic. “New Marathi films are getting launched regularly. The upcoming film Bapya had its screening at Sunny Super Sound, which was attended by non-Marathi journalists in big numbers. The story of Bapya is complex and difficult to make. The point here is that a producer agreed to put his money into the film. Sabar Bonda was another difficult subject which won an award at Sundance. So, producers willing to invest money in such subjects is one positive sign,” he says. Thakur also points to the continued appetite for mainstream Marathi entertainers. “The boom after Sairat still exists in Marathi cinema. There was a setback for four years because of Covid, but the industry has gained momentum. Ravi Jadhav’s new film Fulawara, based on tamasha folk art, will soon go on floors in Pune,” he says. He further notes that Marathi cinema is increasingly attracting investors from outside the industry. “Most Marathi films have non-Marathi investors. They are putting in money because there is business in Marathi cinema. But not every film becomes a hit. Subhash Ghai also produced a few Marathi films. If the subject is good, people are willing to invest,” he adds. Not everyone, however, is convinced that one major hit can alter the industry’s fortunes overnight. Nitin Datar, president of the Cinema Owners Association, remains cautious about reading too much into the film’s success. “Only one film success is not going to bring investors. In the last five years, out of nearly 500 films produced, the success rate has not been encouraging,” he says. Datar acknowledges that the presence of Hindi stars has helped boost the film’s commercial appeal but stresses that Marathi cinema still lacks enough bankable stars capable of consistently drawing audiences to theatres. “The production houses and directors have attracted audiences. Unfortunately, producers haven’t been successful in attracting financial assistance, which has resulted in low production and advertising budgets. But if films succeed in pulling audiences over the weekend, exhibitors automatically increase shows and reduce screenings of underperforming films from other languages. The audience is always there, waiting to visit theatres in large numbers for a good film,” he says. For now, Raja Shivaji has undeniably given Marathi cinema a strong moment in the spotlight. Whether that momentum translates into long-term financial confidence and sustained industry growth remains the larger question.

Trade Tantrum

Donald Trump has never been a fan of facts. But even by his standards, the latest salvo against India reeks of economic illiteracy, diplomatic petulance and strategic folly. With all the subtlety of a sledgehammer, the 47th president of the United States has slapped a punitive 25 percent tariff on Indian imports, cloaking his tantrum in half-truths and hyperbole. He called India a “friend” even as he penalised it more harshly than Vietnam, Indonesia or even China. In reality, the only ‘friend’ Trump seems keen to court sits in Rawalpindi.

 

India is not an American vassal state. Nor is it under the American security umbrella like Europe or Japan. It does not bend easily to pressure, especially not now. India under Narendra Modi is no longer the hesitant, reactive power of the past. It is assertive, nationalistic and increasingly unapologetic in defending its own economic interests. If Trump thinks a crude tariff club would coerce New Delhi into making humiliating concessions, he has misread the mood.

 

The tariffs all but doom prospects for a meaningful trade deal between the two countries—one that was already hanging by a thread. After years of painstaking negotiations, expectations of preferential treatment had risen in New Delhi. The door is now rapidly closing. Trump’s tantrum may delight his isolationist base, but it squanders a rare moment of opportunity in Indo-American ties.

 

His bombast about Indian tariffs and non-monetary trade barriers ignores recent reforms and the real progress made since 2017. Yes, India’s average applied tariffs remain high, especially on agricultural goods, but that is hardly exceptional in the developing world. More importantly, India has been a key player in diversifying supply chains away from China and ramping up purchases of American goods, including high-value aircraft and semiconductors. To treat it as a trade cheat rather than a strategic partner is myopic to say the least.

 

Trump further thundered that India and Russia can “take their dead economies down together.” Perhaps someone should remind him that India is the fastest-growing major economy in the world, and a democratic bulwark in a volatile region. It buys oil from Russia for the same reason Europe once did: cost, geography and realpolitik. That is no justification for economic retribution.

 

Even more galling is Trump’s gleeful announcement of an oil exploration deal with Pakistan, whose military-intelligence establishment has for decades harboured terrorists and undermined American interests. This is the diplomatic equivalent of hugging a cobra. That Trump now chooses to reward Islamabad while punishing India is a throwback to the worst instincts of Cold War-era geopolitics.

 

Yes, there will be pain for Indian exporters of metals, chemicals and engineering goods. But there is also opportunity. India can use this moment to double down on self-reliance, deepen its economic ties with Europe, Southeast Asia and Japan, and accelerate internal reforms to make itself less vulnerable to Western tantrums. After all, Trump is not the emperor of the world. And India is not a doormat.

Comments


bottom of page