Trophy Turmoil
- Correspondent
- Sep 29
- 2 min read
India’s victory over Pakistan in the T20 Asia Cup 2025 final was a masterclass in composure under pressure and a vivid reminder of why cricket is more than a sport on the subcontinent. Chasing a modest 147, India’s innings seemed destined for collapse when they slumped to 20 for 3. At that moment, the narrative could have swung entirely in Pakistan’s favour. Yet, against the odds, Tilak Varma delivered a sterling, unbeaten innings that rewrote the script, blending aggression with a calm hand rarely seen in such tense encounters. Verma’s performance was a reminder that cricketing genius often emerges in pressure-cooker recovery situations.
Earlier, Kuldeep Yadav and Varun Chakravarthy tore through the Pakistan lineup by destroying their seeming invincibility at 107 for 1 to trigger a comprehensive collapse of the Pakistan lineup at 146 all out.
But the denouement of the contest off the field was even more telling than the drama on it. In the shadow of the April 22 Pahalgam terror strike, India had made it clear that they would not accept the trophy from Asian Cricket Council president and Pakistan interior minister Mohsin Naqvi. The ACC attempted to offer an alternative, but Naqvi, in an extraordinary display of obstinacy, ordered the trophy withdrawn. For nearly an hour, Pakistan’s team remained locked in their dressing room while Indian players celebrated their victory on the field without the customary honours.
India’s refusal to shake hands with Pakistan throughout the tournament entirely correct. After the Pahalgam massacre, any semblance of camaraderie with a side representing a country actively indulging in hostile actions would have been inappropriate. Indian cricketers maintained their dignity throughout their games with Pakistan, never rising to their petty provocations on field and soundly trashing them 3-0 in the tournament. Small wonder that after the match, Prime Minister Modi, whilst congratulating the Indian team, said that the outcome was an ‘Operation Sindoor’ (India’s stunning military response to the Pahalgam strike) on the cricketing field as well.
Importantly, the conduct of the Indian team firmly signalled that they would not normalise relations with a team representing a country that continues to challenge India’s security and peace. Leading from the front on this count was Indian captain Suryakumar Yadav who announced he would donate his Asia Cup match fees to the Indian Army and victims of the Pahalgam strike.
This brings to fore the wisdom of staging an India-Pakistan match at all given Pahalgam still remains a raw wound in the collective Indian consciousness. Yet, the BCCI, in its pursuit of commercial spectacle and television ratings, pressed ahead with the fixture, exposing players to unnecessary emotional and reputational risk.
The decision to host India-Pakistan matches amidst ongoing regional volatility undermines the sanctity of sport. Yet, India’s cricketers emerged as true ambassadors of the sport. They combined technical brilliance with poise, navigating both the scoreboard and the shadow of geopolitics with finesse.
Comments