top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law...

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law within the framework of safeguarding India’s pluralistic and democratic character. The AIMPLB leaders said they are soliciting support of people, intellectuals, activists, social and religious organisations who value justice, democracy, peace and the Constitution, to strengthen constitutional supremacy, the rule of law, justice and equality, religious freedom, social harmony and national unity. Around 100 progressive Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals, activists, organisations and supporters have warned that what the AIMPLB presents as a defence of constitutional rights, religious freedom and Muslim identity "could deepen divisions, and may provide political ammunition to right-wing forces". The progressive have accused AIMPLB of selectively invoking Art. 25-30 of the Constitution related to Religious Freedom, while ignoring that these rights are explicitly subject to public order, morality, and health. Moreover, they conveniently bypass Articles 14 and 15, which guarantee equality before the law and prohibit sex or religion-based discrimination. “Following the 2024 Lok Sabha elections where civil society and opposition parties rallied under 'Save the Constitution', the AIMPLB's campaign inadvertently gave the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Sangh Parivar a platform to posture as defenders of constitutional norms. Ahead of crucial state assembly elections, this campaign reinforces false narratives and fuels propaganda that Indian Muslims reject the law of the land,” said the intellectuals. They pointed out how the so-called ‘God-given Shariat Law’ in India is nothing but man-made personal laws and ‘male interpreted patriarchal interpretations’, defended by the AIMPLB. In its September 2016 Supreme Court affidavit in the Triple Talaq case (Sayara Bano v/s. Union of India), the AIMPLB’s affidavit claimed divorce rights belong primarily to husbands because men allegedly possess ‘greater power of decision-making’ and ‘control emotions’. It even argued that without a quick separation option, a husband ‘may resort to illegal, criminal ways of murdering or burning her alive’ - a disturbing rationalization of domestic violence. Claiming these laws are divine, the AIMPLB admitted that “India is a patriarchal society, and therefore personal laws of all communities are aligned with the patriarchal notion...” The progressives countered that Muslim-majority nations globally including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Tunisia and Morocco have codified and reformed personal laws to protect women's rights. “Millions of Muslims live in secular democratic nations with uniform family codes without putting ‘Islam in danger’. The Muslim community’s current legal predicament in India is the direct result of the AIMPLB and conservative leaders failing to proactively reform and codify Muslim Personal Law,” said the progressives sharply. They said that genuine family law reform must guarantee Muslim women equal rights regarding minimum marriage age, abolition of polygamy, mutual divorce, equal inheritance, child custody, adoption, and a ban on female genital mutilation and halala. While secular political parties rarely support the rights of Muslim women, the BJP and the Hindu Right wing do so with an obvious motive: ‘communal polarization’, said the progressives. “The sangh parivar sheds crocodile tears for Muslim women while ignoring relentless hate speech (Love Jihad, Land Jihad…) and hate crimes like mob lynching, bulldozing homes, demolishing mosques or economic boycotts, with chants of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ to intimidate and strike fear. This accompanies state actions targeting Muslims: Waqf Amendment Act, draconian anti-conversion laws, and a weaponised SIR (Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls) to disenfranchise vast sections of the electorate,” they averred. The progressives have sought the active involvement of all enlightened forces, civil society organisations and secular political parties to ensure that the demand for a gender-just, religion-neutral Uniform Civil Code is rooted in equality and human rights, rather than weaponized for communal division. Among the signatories to the appeal are: Naseeruddin Shah, Amol Palekar, Zeenat Shaukat Ali, Anand Patwardhan, Sultan Shaheen, Teesta Setalvad, Ram Puniyani, Tushar Gandhi, Mallika Sarabhai, Ratna Pathak, Feroze Mithiborwala, Anita Cheria, Zakia Soman, Jyothi Yedulla, Noorjehan S. Niaz, Madhu Bhaduri, et al.

Uncommon Presence of the Common Face

Sep 27, 2024
3 min read

Updated: Oct 21, 2024

Uncommon Presence 

In the movie Maharaja, there is a scene that exemplifies the brilliance of Vijay Sethupathi’s acting. Vijay’s character is called to his daughter’s school after she is wrongly accused of mischief. The school owner lashes out at the girl, only for it to be discovered later that another child was responsible. While the issue seems settled, the real drama begins when Vijay Sethupathi calmly asks the school owner to apologise to his daughter. The owner, feeling offended, dismisses him and calls for security to escort Vijay out. In a display of extraordinary restraint, Vijay doesn’t fight or cause a scene. Instead, as he is being dragged toward the door, he grips the bar, locking eyes with the owner, and quietly repeats, “Say sorry to my daughter.” It’s the intensity in his eyes, the quiet resolve, and the understated power of the scene that leaves the audience with goosebumps.

This is what makes Uncommon Presence of the Common Face such an apt phrase to describe Vijay Sethupathi and other actors who defy Bollywood’s conventional definitions of a hero.

Bollywood, for decades, has celebrated a particular mould of the hero: tall, fair-skinned, muscular, and exuding wealthy looks. The leading men have often been those with the polished, picture-perfect looks of the Khans, Kapoors, and Kumars. However, there are exceptions—most notably, Nana Patekar, who, despite his unconventional appearance, managed to command commercial success with his extraordinary talent. For a long time, though, Bollywood didn’t fully embrace actors outside this conventional framework, leaving only a few to pull off lead roles in commercial cinema.

Then came the OTT revolution, which changed the game entirely. As streaming platforms began to gain ground, audiences started seeking authenticity, depth, and diversity in storytelling. With that shift came an appreciation for actors who, while lacking the so-called conventional Bollywood looks, brought extraordinary skill and charisma to the screen. Actors like Pankaj Tripathi, Vijay Verma, Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Jaideep Ahlawat, and Chhaya Kadam became household names—not because of their looks, but because of their sheer talent.

Pankaj Tripathi is a prime example of this transformation. His portrayal of Kaleen Bhaiya in Mirzapur is unforgettable. The series, known for its gritty themes, explicit scenes, and explosive dialogues, wouldn’t have been the same without Tripathi’s magnetic presence. His calm, menacing demeanor had viewers on the edge of their seats, eagerly awaiting his next move or line.

Vijay Verma, another rising star, has also carved a niche for himself with his unconventional looks and immense acting prowess. Audiences remember him fondly for his performances as Sasya in SHE or as Bharat/Shatrughn Tyagi in Mirzapur. His role in Lust Stories 2, especially alongside his rumoured girlfriend Tamannaah Bhatia, became a talking point, not just for his chemistry but for the depth of his performance. In the same league is Chhaya Kadam, a promising actor whose career is filled with memorable roles. She’s left a lasting impression on audiences with her portrayal of Manju Mai in Lapaataa Ladies and her appearance in Jhund alongside Amitabh Bachchan.

Jaideep Ahlawat is yet another fascinating talent whose non-heroic looks have garnered attention to himself. From his gripping roles in Maharaj, Paatal Lok, and Raees, Ahlawat has shown that traditional hero material is no longer a necessity to pull off stellar performances. In the recent film Jaane Jaan, where he shared screen space with Kareena Kapoor and Vijay Verma, Ahlawat held his own and never overshadowed, proving that talent trumps all.

It’s not just about appearances or star power anymore. Audiences today are looking for depth, nuance, and the ability to connect emotionally with characters. Actors like Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Vijay Sethupathi, and Pankaj Tripathi have brought something fresh and raw to the forefront. They’ve made it clear that you don’t need chisseled features or a glossy persona to make an impact. Their uncommon presence—grounded, real, and full of substance—is what today’s viewers crave. In the changing landscape of cinema, especially with the rise of OTT platforms, these “common faces” are proving that extraordinary talent can break stereotypes and redefine what it means to be a star. They are no longer confined to supporting roles or niche films; they are leading the charge, pulling entire shows and movies with their undeniable skill.

(The writer is a communication professional. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page