Venue Politics
- Correspondent
- 3 days ago
- 2 min read
India is poised to welcome the Commonwealth Games (CWG) back after a fifteen-year hiatus, with Ahmedabad now recommended by the Commonwealth Sport Executive Board as the host for 2030. The final decision awaits ratification at the General Assembly in Glasgow on November 26. The announcement is being framed as a triumph as it will then mark the return of the Games return to India with Ahmedabad taking centre stage. Yet, behind the celebration lies a question: why Ahmedabad, and not a city with arguably stronger sporting culture?
The last CWG in India, held in 2010, were hosted in New Delhi, a city accustomed to large-scale events. Shifting the venue westwards to Gujarat is welcome as it breaks the Delhi monopoly, spreading both prestige and opportunity to another region. Ahmedabad has seen rapid urban transformation in recent years, with infrastructure investments, modern stadiums and improved transport connectivity. A CWG there would showcase these developments, signal India’s readiness for global sporting events and give a boost to the western corridor’s sporting ecosystem.
Yet it would be naïve to ignore the political subtext. Gujarat is the home state of India’s most powerful political figures – Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah - and while it would be cynical to suggest this was the sole criterion, it is hard to dismiss this aspect. Sporting decisions, particularly in India, have rarely existed in a vacuum free from politics. If the Games are merely to reinforce political narratives, the opportunity to make a more strategically sound choice could be lost.
Take Nagpur, for instance. Centrally located in Maharashtra, it has been quietly building world-class sports facilities for years. With stadiums, training centres and accommodations already in place, it arguably presents a more practical, athlete-friendly option. Central India also offers better geographical balance, allowing easier access for participants and spectators from across the subcontinent. Bypassing such options in favour of Ahmedabad risks reducing the Games to a showcase of political convenience rather than a celebration of sport at its highest level. While Ahmedabad has invested heavily in urban infrastructure, transport and hospitality, there is another vital aspect. Ahmedabad’s vegetarian reputation, a point of pride in Gujarat, raises practical questions for an event that will draw thousands of international visitors accustomed to diverse diets. So, will non-vegetarian fare be served, and if so, might that strike some as a curious contradiction?
Beyond domestic considerations, hosting the Commonwealth Games is a stepping stone in India’s broader ambitions on the Olympic stage. Ahmedabad’s candidature for the 2036 Olympics is already being floated, and the 2030 Games will serve as a rehearsal of sorts.
India’s Commonwealth Games decision will be remembered not only for the medals won or records broken, but for the message it sends about the country’s priorities. Expanding the Games beyond Delhi is a positive step. But the choice of Ahmedabad must be justified beyond sentiment or symbolism if sport is to remain meritocratic.
Comments