top of page

What if Clive had lost at Plassey?

Writer's picture: Shoumojit BanerjeeShoumojit Banerjee

Updated: Jan 27

Plassey

History is fickle. Some battles leave scars that fade faster than anticipated; others cast shadows long before anyone realizes their magnitude. The Third Battle of Panipat in 1761, where Ahmad Shah Abdali crushed the Marathas, seems to be a colossal turning point in Indian history, but is not. For within a decade, the Marathas, under the indomitable Mahadji Scindia, reclaimed much of their power. In contrast, the Battle of Plassey in 1757 seemed, at first glance, inconsequential. Casualties were minimal, and it passed without the immediate fanfare of a historic reckoning. Yet, over time, Plassey emerged as a defining moment - not just for India, but for the world.


But what if history had taken a different turn? Counterfactual musings about Plassey unravel a labyrinth of possibilities. Bengal’s Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah had allied with the French, aiming to thwart the East India Company’s growing influence. His undoing was not British military genius but treachery - Mir Jafar, his commander-in-chief, defected, handing Robert Clive an improbable victory. Had Mir Jafar stayed loyal, Siraj’s forces might have triumphed, the British probably expelled and India’s history rewritten.


In this alternate timeline, Bengal’s fate diverges sharply. A Franco-Bengali alliance, buoyed by Bengal’s vast wealth, would have stymied British expansion. The East India Company, stripped of its lucrative foothold, might have retreated to Bombay and Madras, curtailing its imperial ambitions. Europe’s balance of power, and by extension global imperialism, would have looked starkly different.


The political implications are equally tantalizing. Without a unified British Raj, India’s future might have mirrored Europe’s - a mosaic of sovereign states locked in alliances and rivalries. The Marathas, Sikhs and Mysore might have risen as dominant regional powers leading to the emergence of a multipolar subcontinent.


In reality, Siraj-ud-daulah was hardly an enlightened ruler, utterly despised for his erratic governance and cruelty. Even without British intervention, Bengal’s fractious nobility would anyway have sought to unseat Siraj. The French lacked the resources to dominate the subcontinent. Their failure to consolidate power in Pondicherry suggests that a Franco-Bengali regime would have struggled to sustain itself against internal dissent and external threats.


Interestingly, for several eminent Bengalis like Sir Jadunath Sarkar, India’s foremost historian, Plassey was a deliverance, not a calamity. Writing in the second volume of The History of Bengal (1948), Sarkar lauded the British victory: “In June 1757, we crossed the frontier and entered into a great new world.” Bengal under British stewardship experienced a Renaissance after Muslim—a cultural, intellectual, and social awakening broader than Europe’s post-Constantinople revival, Sarkar argued, remarking that the British had rescued Bengal from the “blight of medieval theocratic rule,” transforming a neglected corner of the subcontinent into a vanguard for India’s modernization.


Closer to home, Siraj’s victory would have had profound ripple effects. Without British consolidation in Bengal, the ‘Bengal Renaissance’ – the flowering of intellectual, artistic and social reform movements might never have materialized and reformers like Raja Ram Mohun Roy and Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar might have remained obscured in a landscape untouched by Enlightenment ideals. Bengal, rather than becoming a pathfinder for India’s modernization, could have languished under fragmented, medieval rule.


Plassey, as it happened, marked a watershed. It transformed the East India Company from a trading enterprise into a political empire-builder. Bengal’s fertile lands and lucrative trade networks became the financial bedrock for Britain’s expansion. Had Clive been defeated, this imperial enterprise might have been delayed or derailed altogether.


Plassey’s significance lies not just in what happened but in what might have been. For Bengal, it was the beginning of a transformation—a Renaissance borne of conquest. For the world, it was the dawn of an empire whose shadow still looms large.

Comments


bottom of page