top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Indian students strike gold

Mumbai: India’s brightest young scientific minds have once again proven their mettle on the global stage, securing exceptional medal hauls at two of the world’s most prestigious science competitions for secondary school students. Showcasing unprecedented academic prowess, the Indian delegation brought home a historic all-gold sweep at the 58th International Chemistry Olympiad in Uzbekistan, alongside an impressive haul of one gold and three silver medals at the 37th International Biology...

Indian students strike gold

Mumbai: India’s brightest young scientific minds have once again proven their mettle on the global stage, securing exceptional medal hauls at two of the world’s most prestigious science competitions for secondary school students. Showcasing unprecedented academic prowess, the Indian delegation brought home a historic all-gold sweep at the 58th International Chemistry Olympiad in Uzbekistan, alongside an impressive haul of one gold and three silver medals at the 37th International Biology Olympiad in Lithuania. These stellar performances cement India’s position as a powerhouse of STEM talent, reflecting the rigorous training and dedication cultivated by the Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education (HBCSE) and a nationwide network of educators, said national coordinator of Science Olympiads Prof. Anwesh Mazumdar. In a landmark achievement, all four students representing India at the International Chemistry Olympiad, held in Tashkent from July 10 to 19, bagged gold medals. This marks India’s first-ever all-gold sweep in the history of the competition. The victorious quartet includes Debadatta Priyadarshi from Bhubaneswar, Harshit Singla from Mandi Gobindgarh, Kabeer Chillar from Delhi, and Sandeep Kuchi from Hyderabad. This year’s event was the largest to date, featuring 363 students from 93 countries. India’s flawless performance tied the nation for the top spot in the country-wise medals tally, sharing the first position with China, Vietnam, and an individual participant from Russia. The students navigated highly complex experimental and theoretical tasks, including decoding the composition of historical and natural artifacts, calculating the mass of uranium used in a 1966 detonation, and performing advanced pH-metric titrations. The team was guided by Head Mentor Professor Subhajit Bandyopadhyay, Mentor Dr. Indrani Sen, and Scientific Observers Dr. Anubendu Adhikary and Dr. Jayasree Gopalakrishnan. Running concurrently in Vilnius from July 12 to 19, the International Biology Olympiad saw the Indian team secure one gold and three silver medals against a highly competitive field of 307 students from 78 nations. Bhavyaa Gunwal from Mahendragarh clinched the gold medal, while Soumil Maity from Howrah, Nishit Kalani from Pali, and Anmol Kumar from Mansa each brought home silver. The biology competition pushed the boundaries of secondary education with a gruelling six-hour theoretical exam and an intensive six-hour practical laboratory test designed by the Vilnius University Life Sciences Centre. In the labs, students executed complex molecular biology tasks like restriction digestion, evaluated the pharmacokinetics of aspirin, performed precise insect morphology dissections, and utilized cutting-edge digital software for plant transcriptome analysis. The delegation was led by Professor Rekha Vartak and Dr. Anupama Ronad, alongside Scientific Observers Dr. Ranjithsinh Devkar and Dr. Siddhesh Ghag.

What if Clive had lost at Plassey?

Updated: Jan 27, 2025

Plassey

History is fickle. Some battles leave scars that fade faster than anticipated; others cast shadows long before anyone realizes their magnitude. The Third Battle of Panipat in 1761, where Ahmad Shah Abdali crushed the Marathas, seems to be a colossal turning point in Indian history, but is not. For within a decade, the Marathas, under the indomitable Mahadji Scindia, reclaimed much of their power. In contrast, the Battle of Plassey in 1757 seemed, at first glance, inconsequential. Casualties were minimal, and it passed without the immediate fanfare of a historic reckoning. Yet, over time, Plassey emerged as a defining moment - not just for India, but for the world.


But what if history had taken a different turn? Counterfactual musings about Plassey unravel a labyrinth of possibilities. Bengal’s Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah had allied with the French, aiming to thwart the East India Company’s growing influence. His undoing was not British military genius but treachery - Mir Jafar, his commander-in-chief, defected, handing Robert Clive an improbable victory. Had Mir Jafar stayed loyal, Siraj’s forces might have triumphed, the British probably expelled and India’s history rewritten.


In this alternate timeline, Bengal’s fate diverges sharply. A Franco-Bengali alliance, buoyed by Bengal’s vast wealth, would have stymied British expansion. The East India Company, stripped of its lucrative foothold, might have retreated to Bombay and Madras, curtailing its imperial ambitions. Europe’s balance of power, and by extension global imperialism, would have looked starkly different.


The political implications are equally tantalizing. Without a unified British Raj, India’s future might have mirrored Europe’s - a mosaic of sovereign states locked in alliances and rivalries. The Marathas, Sikhs and Mysore might have risen as dominant regional powers leading to the emergence of a multipolar subcontinent.


In reality, Siraj-ud-daulah was hardly an enlightened ruler, utterly despised for his erratic governance and cruelty. Even without British intervention, Bengal’s fractious nobility would anyway have sought to unseat Siraj. The French lacked the resources to dominate the subcontinent. Their failure to consolidate power in Pondicherry suggests that a Franco-Bengali regime would have struggled to sustain itself against internal dissent and external threats.


Interestingly, for several eminent Bengalis like Sir Jadunath Sarkar, India’s foremost historian, Plassey was a deliverance, not a calamity. Writing in the second volume of The History of Bengal (1948), Sarkar lauded the British victory: “In June 1757, we crossed the frontier and entered into a great new world.” Bengal under British stewardship experienced a Renaissance after Muslim—a cultural, intellectual, and social awakening broader than Europe’s post-Constantinople revival, Sarkar argued, remarking that the British had rescued Bengal from the “blight of medieval theocratic rule,” transforming a neglected corner of the subcontinent into a vanguard for India’s modernization.


Closer to home, Siraj’s victory would have had profound ripple effects. Without British consolidation in Bengal, the ‘Bengal Renaissance’ – the flowering of intellectual, artistic and social reform movements might never have materialized and reformers like Raja Ram Mohun Roy and Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar might have remained obscured in a landscape untouched by Enlightenment ideals. Bengal, rather than becoming a pathfinder for India’s modernization, could have languished under fragmented, medieval rule.


Plassey, as it happened, marked a watershed. It transformed the East India Company from a trading enterprise into a political empire-builder. Bengal’s fertile lands and lucrative trade networks became the financial bedrock for Britain’s expansion. Had Clive been defeated, this imperial enterprise might have been delayed or derailed altogether.


Plassey’s significance lies not just in what happened but in what might have been. For Bengal, it was the beginning of a transformation—a Renaissance borne of conquest. For the world, it was the dawn of an empire whose shadow still looms large.

Comments


bottom of page