top of page

By:

Correspondent

21 August 2024 at 10:20:16 am

Broken Corridors

India likes to celebrate its growing tiger population as one of conservation’s great success stories. But tigers survive and thrive because their habitats remain connected. Fragmenting those forests entails risks for thriving tiger populations. The decision to grant an in-principle wildlife clearance for a third railway line through the Satpura-Melghat tiger corridor carries with it precisely that risk. The proposed railway line between Jujharpur and Chichonda cuts through one of central...

Broken Corridors

India likes to celebrate its growing tiger population as one of conservation’s great success stories. But tigers survive and thrive because their habitats remain connected. Fragmenting those forests entails risks for thriving tiger populations. The decision to grant an in-principle wildlife clearance for a third railway line through the Satpura-Melghat tiger corridor carries with it precisely that risk. The proposed railway line between Jujharpur and Chichonda cuts through one of central India’s most critical wildlife landscapes, linking the Satpura and Melghat tiger reserves and forming part of the larger Satpura-Pench-Melghat landscape. This corridor is a biological highway, allowing tigers and other wildlife to disperse, breed and maintain healthy genetic diversity. The Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife has insisted that mitigation measures such as wildlife overpasses be scientifically designed and reviewed before implementation. Yet the clearance itself exposes an unsettling contradiction. The committee’s own inspection found that the proposed 34 wildlife overpasses were based largely on field observations and mortality records rather than rigorous scientific assessment. Detailed engineering designs are still absent. Importantly, the comprehensive landscape study by the State Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur, is still awaited. The approval has been granted before the study is in. This reverses the basic principle that should govern projects in ecologically sensitive landscapes. Scientific evidence must guide approvals, not merely refine them after the fact. Once a project gathers administrative momentum, conditions often become exercises in compliance rather than conservation. There have been far too many examples where mitigation structures were inadequately designed, poorly located or inconsistently monitored, leaving wildlife to bear the consequences. The danger extends beyond tigers. The Satpura-Melghat landscape supports leopards, sloth bears, wild dogs, gaur and countless smaller species that depend on uninterrupted forests. Railways have already emerged as a significant source of wildlife mortality across India. Faster trains, higher traffic density and expanding rail infrastructure multiply these risks, especially where animal movement corridors intersect transport networks. None of this argues against development. India’s expanding economy requires better freight movement and modern transport infrastructure. But development ceases to be sustainable when it treats ecological safeguards as hurdles instead of foundations. While a railway can be built, a forest corridor, once fragmented, cannot simply be reconstructed through concrete overpasses and engineering optimism. India has spent decades and enormous public resources restoring tiger habitats and expanding protected areas. Allowing critical corridors to shrink through piecemeal clearances would squander those gains. The Satpura-Melghat corridor is the artery through which one of India’s finest wildlife landscapes continues to breathe. That said, if the government gets the balance between development and conversation right, this project could well become a model for reconciling economic ambition with ecological responsibility.

When Silence Is Systemic

The TCS Nashik scandal reveals a profound institutional failure where HR inaction turned a marquee workplace into a site of sustained abuse.

Imagine getting your first big job at a famous company. You are young, excited, and full of hope. That is exactly how hundreds of young women felt when Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) opened its Nashik center in March 2016. For many of them, it was the start of a bright future. But for some of those women, the workplace became a nightmare without end.


Last month, one brave woman walked into a police station and filed a complaint against Tausif Attar, a team leader at TCS Nashik. That one complaint opened a Pandora’s Box and soon, eight women came forward with similar stories. The number surged to twelve.


Modus Operandi

What the police uncovered was not a single bad apple acting alone but a veritable conspiracy. According to investigators, the modus operandi of the gang was incremental. Step-by-step, they first befriended new recruits who were young, inexperienced, and often financially dependent on their jobs during the training period. Then, they tested boundaries by passing inappropriate remarks, followed by demands that grew harder to resist. The implied threat was constant: if you speak up, you risk losing your livelihood. In some appalling instances, their inducements took the form of false promises of affection or marriage.


Most disturbing of all, the accused allegedly used religion as a weapon by making disrespectful remarks about Hindu deities and pressuring women to change their beliefs and way of life. While such details, if proven, are grim. But they are not the most unsettling part of the story.


That distinction belongs to the institutional response or lack of it. The women did what corporate systems are designed to encourage: they documented their experiences and reported them. By the police’s account, 78 emails were sent detailing harassment and coercion.


And yet, nothing was done. Ashwini Chainani, an Assistant General Manager in HR, has been arrested because she reportedly ignored every single one of those emails. The very person whose job was to help employees was allegedly helping to hide the problem. There were also international links found by the police. A preacher from Malaysia named Imran allegedly contacted some victims over video calls, promising them better opportunities abroad. The passport of at least one victim was reportedly being processed raising serious fears about the possibility of human trafficking which the police later ruled out.


Swift Action

To their credit, when the Nashik Police understood the seriousness of what was happening, they did not treat this as a simple matter. They formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT). Women police officers went undercover, entering the workplace without revealing who they were, and quietly observing the accused. The police studied footage from nearly 40 CCTV cameras placed in and around the building. They checked call records, digital messages, and all the emails. Under the leadership of Police Commissioner Sandeep Karnik, the team worked carefully and patiently. Eight primary suspects were identified and arrested. The HR officer who had failed to act on the complaints was also taken into custody. Multiple formal cases were filed against different members of the accused network.


The police deserve kudos for handling this case with seriousness and intelligence. They did not rush in blindly. They built a solid case before taking any step. That kind of careful, evidence-based investigation is exactly what a case like this needed.


But this case poses an uncomfortable question to society at large: how did such conduct persist, for so long, within a prominent and well-regarded firm? Seventy-eight emails were sent. They vanished into silence. This is not merely the failure of a company or an HR department; it is a deeper failure of attention and of how lightly we treat a plea for help when it first arrives.


There is, too, a quieter lesson, one that belongs beyond the workplace. Families, especially parents, would do well to heed it. When a son or daughter grows withdrawn, suddenly fearful, or guarded in ways they were not before, it is rarely without cause. The response must not be anger or interrogation, but patience and care. A conversation, gently opened and free of judgment, can interrupt a chain of harm before it tightens. Home must remain the one place where the burden of proof does not fall on the vulnerable - where they are, instinctively and without hesitation, believed.


The alleged mastermind, Nida Khan, remains at large. Yet the Nashik Police have signalled resolve; key members of the network have been arrested, and the investigation proceeds with deliberation. Justice, in this instance, is being assembled piece by piece.


Even so, the larger reminder endures. Safety cannot be outsourced to the police alone. It must begin at home, be enforced at work, and be sustained by a collective willingness to listen, seriously and in time, when someone chooses to speak.


(The writer is a political observer. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page