top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 4:29:04 pm

Algorithmic Anarchy

The NEET paper leak protests at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar should have remained a legitimate expression of student anger over the collapse of examination integrity. Instead, as the agitation escalated into clashes with the police, abusive sloganeering and an increasingly radical political campaign, Meta’s algorithms emerged as an invisible force multiplying the unrest. The controversy surrounding the brief removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s message to the youth in the aftermath of the...

Algorithmic Anarchy

The NEET paper leak protests at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar should have remained a legitimate expression of student anger over the collapse of examination integrity. Instead, as the agitation escalated into clashes with the police, abusive sloganeering and an increasingly radical political campaign, Meta’s algorithms emerged as an invisible force multiplying the unrest. The controversy surrounding the brief removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s message to the youth in the aftermath of the protests only reinforces that concern. Meta has attributed the takedown to a “technical glitch” and apologised. But when the world’s largest social media platform can temporarily suppress the message of the elected leader of the world’s largest democracy during a politically charged moments, the issue extends well beyond a single deleted post. Who decides what India sees? That question has become impossible to ignore during the Cockroach Janta Party’s protests. Across Instagram and Facebook, users have reported being inundated with CJP videos, reels and protest clips despite never following the organisation or engaging with similar political content. Whether this resulted from coordinated paid collaborations, recommendation algorithms or both deserves a thorough investigation. But the larger democratic concern is that public opinion is increasingly being mediated not by citizens, journalists or elected representatives, but by opaque algorithms designed in Silicon Valley and optimised for engagement rather than democratic responsibility. Meta’s recommendation engine is not a passive notice board. Every piece of political content that reaches millions has first been selected by an algorithm whose workings remain largely hidden from public scrutiny. This is hardly unique to India. Around the world, Meta has repeatedly been accused of amplifying polarisation, misinformation and political extremism because outrage keeps users engaged. From elections to ethnic conflicts and episodes of civil unrest, the company has faced persistent criticism that its commercial incentives reward divisive content over balanced discourse. Democracies cannot afford to outsource the architecture of public debate to corporations whose primary obligation is to shareholders rather than constitutional values. While citizens are entitled to challenge governments and demand accountability, there is an important distinction between a movement that expands because people are persuaded and one that appears to be algorithmically amplified into omnipresence. Equally disturbing has been the normalisation of abusive political language during the protests. When such content is repeatedly amplified through recommendation systems, platforms cease to be neutral intermediaries and become active participants in degrading democratic discourse. Platforms that influence elections, protests and public opinion must explain how political recommendations are generated and why particular narratives receive extraordinary amplification. Silicon Valley companies insist they are merely technology platforms. But their algorithms increasingly exercise editorial power. When software determines which protests dominate national conversations and whose voices disappear, technology has already become politics.

Why 1974’s Murder on the Orient Express is the finest Agatha film

Updated: Jan 2, 2025

Murder on the Orient Express

1974 was a banner year for cinema, a time when screens were graced with films of exceptional variety and brilliance, from ‘The Godfather Part II’ to ‘Chinatown.’ Nestled among titans was Sidney Lumet’s adaptation of Agatha Christie’s ‘Murder on the Orient Express,’ a film that stands not just as a masterclass in storytelling but as a shining beacon among Christie adaptations.


At the heart of this triumph is Albert Finney, delivering a performance as Hercule Poirot that reportedly won Christie’s rare seal of approval. Finney’s Poirot is simultaneously larger than life and grounded in meticulous realism. His accent, mannerisms and obsessive quirks leap off the screen with a vivacity that feels tailor-made for the character. Where other portrayals might lean into caricature, Finney’s approach ensures Poirot is both absurdly comic and deeply human - a detective whose “little grey cells” pulsate with energy and purpose.


Lumet, renowned for his dexterity across genres, helms the film with an assured touch, marshalling one of the most dazzling (and suspicious) casts ever assembled and ensuring every player is given a moment to shine.


And what a cast it is: Vanessa Redgrave exudes elegance and warmth; Sean Connery brings his trademark gravitas; Wendy Hiller’s regal air commands attention. Sir John Gielgud’s butler is pitch-perfect, while Lauren Bacall’s brash and haughty performance brims with charisma. Ingrid Bergman, in an Oscar-winning turn, imbues her role with a poignant yet crafty ‘simplicity’ that lingers long after her brief scenes. Add to this Anthony Perkins’s shifty nervousness, Martin Balsam’s dependable solidity, and Jean-Pierre Cassel’s understated charm, and the train feels populated not just with characters but with a vibrant cross-section of humanity. At the core of this ensemble lies Richard Widmark’s sinister Ratchett, whose murder sets the plot in motion and whose presence haunts every frame.


One of the most striking aspects of the 1974 version is its meticulous attention to detail. From the luxurious, claustrophobic train compartments to the haunting snowscapes of the Balkans of the 1930s, the film’s setting is an active participant in the drama. Paul Dehn’s literate screenplay and Geoffrey Unsworth’s sumptuous cinematography immerses the viewer in a world where every clue feels tangible, every gesture significant.


The film is further elevated by Richard Rodney Bennett’s exquisite score which is a haunting, evocative mix of melancholy and intrigue, particularly while underscoring the Baby Armstrong kidnapping case. It is a score that lingers in memory, as integral to the film’s atmosphere as the locomotive’s whistle or the crunch of snow underfoot.


Contrast Lumet’s version to Kenneth Branagh’s 2017 all-star remake, which falls short on nearly every front. Where Lumet’s sumptuous version feels timeless and organic, Branagh’s feels sterile and hollow, a pale echo of its predecessor with the talented Branagh no match for Finney.


While many actors have stepped into Poirot’s patent leather shoes, few have managed to leave a lasting impression. David Suchet’s portrayal in the ITV series remains the definitive interpretation - a Poirot so finely realized that he has become synonymous with the character. However, the Suchet-led ‘Murder on the Orient Express’ utterly lacks the cinematic flair and ensemble dynamism that make the 1974 film so unforgettable.


The 1974 Orient Express also casts a long shadow over subsequent Christie adaptations for cinema. Peter Ustinov’s outings as Poirot, though entertaining in their own right, fail to capture the gravitas and finesse of Finney’s Poirot or the tight orchestration of Lumet’s direction. Death on the Nile (1978), while passable, lacks the tension and narrative drive of ‘Orient Express,’ and Evil Under the Sun (1982) leans too heavily on camp at the expense of mystery.


Ultimately, what sets the 1974 version apart is its ability to balance reverence for Christie’s work with the demands of cinematic storytelling. Lumet, Finney, and the ensemble cast create a world that is as intricate and compelling as the novel itself. It is a rare adaptation that not only honours its source material but transcends it, becoming a classic in its own right.


In a year crowded with cinematic masterpieces, ‘Murder on the Orient Express’ carved out its own niche — not by chasing trends or reinventing the wheel, but by embracing the timeless allure of a well-told story.

Comments

bottom of page