top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Why Half-Delegation Doubles the Load

“Delegation without release doesn’t free you … it multiplies your work.”

Every founder says they want to delegate. Few actually do. What most leaders practice isn’t delegation. It’s half-delegation: tasks pushed down, but ownership of standards and outcomes quietly held back.


The illusion is powerful. On paper, the team looks empowered. In reality, every loop still circles back. The founder steps out… only to re-enter through side doors: WhatsApp overrides, midnight edits, “just a quick check” messages.


Instead of freeing them, half-delegation doubles the load.


The Factory Example

At “The Factory” (our case study of this series), the founder had finally hired senior managers. Production head, operations head, finance lead. “Now I can focus on strategy,” he told us. For a few weeks, it seemed to work. He stepped back from the daily stand-ups. Managers ran reviews on their own.


But then patterns emerged:

  • WhatsApp messages at midnight correcting quality details.

  • Quick edits to client proposals after teams had already approved.

  • Vendor negotiations reopened because “he knew the history better.”


From the team’s perspective, nothing had changed. They were still executing under his shadow. From his perspective, he was working twice as hard. Delegated tasks still lived in his head. He tracked them, worried about them, and re-entered them after the team had already moved.


This is the cost of half-delegation: two versions of the same work … one done by the team, one replayed in the founder’s brain.


Why Half-Delegation Happens

Founders don’t cling because they want control. They cling because they fear loss.

Loss of quality.

Loss of client trust.

Loss of consistency.


So they push the task out, but keep the standard inside. They let the team act, but reserve the right to intervene.


It feels safer. In truth, it’s corrosive. Teams learn their work isn’t final. Leaders drown in mental residue. And the cycle repeats.


Delegation Debt

We call this delegation debt: the compounded load that builds when you hand off action but not ownership.


At The Factory, delegation debt showed up in endless corrections. Managers stopped making confident calls because they knew he would revisit them anyway. Every decision took twice as long … once when the team acted, again when the founder “checked.”


It would have been less work if he had done it himself. At least then the loop closed once.


Cognitive Residue

Even when founders don’t step back in, they often carry what we call cognitive residue … the mental fragments of tasks supposedly delegated. The factory founder described it perfectly: “I tell them it’s theirs. But I still think about it at night. I still wonder if they’ll get it right.”


That residue meant he never truly switched off. Even when he didn’t intervene, he stayed tethered. Delegation in words, ownership in mind.


Phantom Ownership

The cruelest part is what happens to teams. They think they’ve been trusted. They take ownership. Then suddenly, the founder reappears with edits, corrections, or vetoes.


That’s phantom ownership where responsibility looks transferred but still defaults back to the founder. It breeds frustration. Teams stop trying to own outcomes because they know ownership isn’t real. And leaders complain about lack of accountability … without realizing they’ve sabotaged it themselves.


Breaking the Cycle

Half-delegation isn’t better than no delegation. It’s worse. At least when you own it fully, the loops close once. In half-delegation, every loop closes twice: once in the system, once in your head.


Breaking the cycle requires three deliberate shifts:

Define Done. Don’t just assign the task. Make clear who decides it’s finished.

Make Standards Visible. If quality benchmarks live in your memory, they’re still yours. Write them down.


Exit Publicly. Tell the team where you’re stepping out and mean it. If you return, explain why, once. Then fix the system, not the person.


The Human Confession

One founder put it bluntly: 


“I thought I was delegating. Turns out I was just postponing my work … until I came back to redo it.”


That’s the heart of half-delegation. It doesn’t free you. It delays you. And in the process, it erodes the team’s confidence while doubling your own burden.


Final Reflection

The illusion of control is seductive. It feels like safety. In reality, it’s slow poison. True delegation isn’t about pushing tasks down. It’s about releasing ownership. Until you do, you’re not freeing capacity — you’re multiplying debt.


If you find yourself re-entering loops you “gave away,” you’re not delegating. You’re shadow-managing. And your team is learning that nothing they do is ever final. The day you release not just the task but the standard is the day you start to scale. Until then, every handoff will keep coming back.


Read more in-depth insights at: www.ppsconsulting.biz/blog


(The writer is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page