top of page

By:

C.S. Krishnamurthy

21 June 2025 at 7:45:51 pm

Strong India, Cautious Investor

The Indian economy appears stronger than the nervousness visible in the stock market might suggest. Corporate earnings are improving, domestic demand remains reasonably resilient and several sectors are reporting healthy growth. Yet investors are facing an unusual mix of risks: crude oil is moving towards $100 a barrel, global bond yields are rising, foreign investors have turned sellers again and parts of the Indian market remain expensive. That leads to a simple investment message: India's...

Strong India, Cautious Investor

The Indian economy appears stronger than the nervousness visible in the stock market might suggest. Corporate earnings are improving, domestic demand remains reasonably resilient and several sectors are reporting healthy growth. Yet investors are facing an unusual mix of risks: crude oil is moving towards $100 a barrel, global bond yields are rising, foreign investors have turned sellers again and parts of the Indian market remain expensive. That leads to a simple investment message: India's growth story remains intact, but investors should not mistake a strong economy for a risk-free stock market. The latest corporate results offer considerable comfort. The economic momentum built over the past few quarters has not been derailed by geopolitical tensions. The margin pressure feared across several industries has also been less severe than expected. More importantly, earnings growth has been reasonably broad based. Large, mid and small companies have all shown healthy growth. If oil-related businesses, which are somewhat different in their earnings pattern, are excluded, the gap between the three market segments is not particularly wide. Financial services have been among the strongest performers, with banks, NBFCs and capital-market businesses reporting good growth. Capital goods, metals, telecom and power have also done well. For investors, this is significant. A stock market supported by genuine improvement in corporate profits has a much stronger foundation than one driven merely by enthusiasm. Domestic Risk The monsoon, however, remains an important domestic risk. Rainfall has been below normal so far, although the impact on the rural economy has not yet been alarming. Tractor and two-wheeler sales remain reasonably strong, suggesting that parts of rural India continue to spend. At the same time, increased demand under the rural employment guarantee programme suggests that weaker rainfall may be affecting poorer rural households more severely. Food inflation adds another complication. Higher food prices may improve the income of farmers who sell their produce, but they also increase the expenses of families who buy food. Therefore, higher food inflation cannot automatically be interpreted as stronger rural purchasing power. India is nevertheless better prepared than it once was. A healthy IPO market is a positive development. It allows companies to raise capital and gives investors fresh opportunities. But there is a point at which too much supply begins competing for the same pool of money. The current market provides a striking example. The much-awaited IPO of the National Stock Exchange is reportedly being considered at a size of around Rs. 24,000 to Rs. 25,000 crore, down from earlier expectations of Rs. 30,000 crore but a very large issue nonetheless. The message is not that investors should avoid IPOs. It is that an exciting new issue should not automatically be preferred over an established company merely because the new issue is attracting headlines. The bigger uncertainties are global. Brent crude has moved close to $100 a barrel as tensions in the Middle East have intensified. For India, which imports most of its energy requirements, expensive crude can mean higher inflation, a wider trade deficit and pressure on economic growth. US bond yields are another concern. Higher yields make dollar investments more attractive and can reduce the appetite for emerging markets such as India. This does not necessarily mean that global investors have abandoned India. It shows how quickly investment decisions can change when oil prices, interest rates and currencies move. Domestic investors, particularly mutual fund investors, therefore have an important role in providing stability. Their regular investments can partly offset foreign selling, although domestic flows cannot make the market immune to global shocks. Faster Growth The enthusiasm for small and mid-cap stocks is understandable. Many of these companies offer faster growth and have rewarded investors handsomely. But if investors pay too much for expected growth, even a good company's share price can disappoint. Large-cap companies, after a period of relative underperformance, may offer more comfortable valuations and greater stability. The right mix will depend on an investor’s financial goals, investment horizon and ability to withstand market fluctuations. India’s economic story remains encouraging. Corporate earnings are healthy, domestic demand has resilience and the economy has become better equipped to absorb individual shocks. But the stock market is not the economy. For the common investor, therefore, the most useful question today may not be, “What should I buy?” It may be, “Is my portfolio balanced enough to withstand what I cannot predict?” (The writer is a retired banker and author. He can be reached at krs1957@hotmail.com. Views personal.)

Why is Mamata Seeing Ghost of Bangladesh?

Writer: Romita Datta
Romita Datta
Aug 27, 2024
4 min read

Updated: Oct 21, 2024

Why is Mamata Seeing Ghost of Bangladesh?

Mamata is seeing a ghost of Bangladesh behind the massive outrage and waves of protest over rape and murder of the trainee doctor. And the reasons are many.

It’s been over a fortnight. Yet with each passing day the voice of protest is getting louder and stronger. From the streets of Kolkata it’s pouring into roads of hinterland. The cry for justice for a rape victim has consolidated into a wail of demands to set a lot of wrongdoings right. Here in lies the fear and trepidation. Wasn’t the issue that brought the youth of Bangladesh out on the thoroughfares a simple, innocent one of quota reform?

The chief minister of Bengal, known for understanding the pulse of people better than many, was quick to read the signages floating in the political horizon.

The most obvious reason for her to be tensed is that both the regime change in Bangladesh and the mass protest in Bengal, were student-driven to begin with. The two incidents---end of 15 year old Sheikh Hasina government and turbulence in West Bengal, over the heinous crime, falling back to back, the first on August 5th and the latter from August 9th onwards, give natural scope for comparisons. More so, because in both the cases the movement strayed beyond an affected constituency to include aggrieved people at large, cutting across socio-economic demography. If the quota reform protest started by students in Bangladesh became a mass uprising against an autocratic regime, the campaign demanding justice for the rape victim and overall safety and security of women in Mamata Banerjee’s Bengal soon snowballed into a movement of no-confidence against the government. Slogans--”Mamata must resign” also got floated in social media much in line with the call for ouster of Sheikh Hasina. In fact “Resignation of Hasina” became the single point agenda into which all other fringe demands coalesced.

Incidentally, even before people started drawing parallels, that there could be a thread of commonality in the way the upheaval in Bangladesh and Bengal played out, Mamata was quick to point out that the Opposition were trying to pull off a Bangladesh by politicizing the tragic incident: “A coordinated approach has been executed by the BJP and the CPIM with support from the Centre to defame Bengal and exploit the situation....They want to make a Bangladesh here. They are taking cues from student unrest in Bangladesh and are attempting to capture similarly. I have no longing for the chair. I came here to serve people.”

Not only Mamata, her political lieutenants are consistently equating the turmoil in Bengal with the mayhem in Bangladesh. Cabinet minister for North Bengal development Udayan Guha threatened to take stern action against those, who would be trying to exploit the situation by emulating a Bangladesh like movement. “ Even after the hospital was vandalised, the police did not open fire on anyone. The police will not allow a Bangladesh type situation. We will not allow Bengal to turn into Bangladesh, Guha thundered.

Is the government’s fear unfounded?

Apart from the similarities on ground zero, as to how and where the future course of events are heading to, there are ample reasons for Bengal to mull on-- as to what led to a Bangladesh like boiling point. To begin with, it’ll be appropriate to talk of Bangladesh and the prevailing situation, that made the students’ protest become big in magnitude. The students were out on the streets because of a high reservation in public jobs. Unemployment and stagnant job market in private sector coupled with a high rate of inflation drove the educated youth to rebel against the government.

But soon the students found enormous number of sympathisers, who were equally at the receiving end. According to Bangladesh citizens, the last two terms of the Sheikh Hasina government were a mockery of democracy. Even elections would be compromised. As Hasina grew from strength to strength, she politicized institutions. The rank and file of police owed allegiance to the ruling dispensation. Extortion, harrassment and raids by police and people in power became rampant. An atmosphere of fear and repression reigned and people got restless to overthrow the government.

Politicization of institutions has been happening in Mamata government too. Allegations are quite strong that police in Bengal functions at the beck and call of political bosses. The lapses and alleged loopholes on the part of police in handling the rape and murder of the young doctor have yet again revealed a sense of confused or misplaced loyalty.

But above everything else both Hasina and Mamata governments allegedly seem to have twined in accepting corruption as a way of life. In Bangladesh jobs of primary and secondary teachers got sold at premium, Rs 10-12 lakh in the Hasina regime. Even police had to pay up for prized postings and transfers. In Bengal busting of the teacher’s recruitment scam has revealed how unsuccessful and ineligible candidates got government jobs in schools in exchange of bribes.

Similarities are multiple and inescapable. Mamata has good reasons to be apprehensive. It’s not only she, who can see and connect the dots. People, out on the streets, clamoring for justice, can see a providential pattern somewhere in the unfolding of future events in these two places-- Bangladesh and Bengal. True, they share more than 2,217 odd km of border. They share the same umbilical cord, other than language, culture, ethos, icons. Even emotions are the same. So she cannot take any risk.

(The writer is a senior jounalist based in Kolkata. Views personal)

Comments

bottom of page