top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Worries Over Displacements

If we see thoroughly, it is a clear-cut fact that dams and reservoirs provide economic and social benefits that contribute drastically to the management of water, which is becoming an inadequate resource. Nevertheless, these dams and reservoirs may have undesirable environmental and social impacts. The most challenging social impact of dams is the displacement of native people. This is one of the worst impacts of the dam construction on communities, people, all the families in the vicinity and even some villages that have been forced to leave their homes and relocate somewhere else. Therefore, there is tremendous pressure on the government for detailed and accurate assessments by experts to anticipate the socio-economic impacts. The dam affected and displaced people are more in number in Maharashtra than any other state.


Peasants in Maharashtra fought the first struggle against dams in early 1920s, which opposed the Mulshi dam built by the Tatas. Significantly, this is the first known movement organized by the dam-affected persons in India and throughout the world. However, for various reasons, this movement failed. Since then, the fight for survival of displaced people has continued. The venue might be different in the state but the pursuit to get justice is never-ending.


The Sardar Sarovar Dam was proposed in 1961 on the Narmada river near Navagam in Gujarat. It is the largest in a series of large irrigation and hydroelectric multi-purpose dams on the river. The dam has been the focal point of one of India’s largest public movements against mass displacement of farmers, fisherfolk and indigenous people living within the submergence area of the dam. The movement against the dam, known as Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), is led by social activist Medha Patkar.


Initially the government identified 2,000 families equivalent to about 1,50,000 people -- as affected in the states of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Gujarat. The Sardar Sarovar Dam’s construction was completed to its full height of 138.68 metres in 2017, and the NCA permitted filling the dam to its full capacity based on a clearance from its rehabilitation sub-group that all families had been rehabilitated. Thirty-three villages in Maharashtra were submerged, 4,300 families displaced. According to data from the Narmada Bachao Andolan, 4,135 families were resettled over the last 25 years. Efforts are under way to rehabilitate remaining families, this is a reply form the Maharashtra government for last two decades.


The most challenging social impact of the dam is the displacement of native people. During the vacation their ancestral land and houses were acquired by the government. They are still living in re -settlement. Government forcefully tried to shift them to villages. Some villagers, particularly the old people, succumbed to the strong-arm tactics. But still there are people who are relentlessly fighting for the cause. They categorically refused to move out of the submerged area.

Comments


bottom of page