top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

A Battle for the Future

Updated: Feb 19, 2025

The Serbian government’s failure in the face of a deadly accident has sparked a youth-led revolution that threatens to unseat its long-time populist president.

Serbian

In Serbia, Statehood Day last week saw a dramatic demonstration of the growing divide between the establishment and a disillusioned populace desperate for change. Thousands of students gathered in Kragujevac, demanding justice and an end to corruption. The contrasting messages — President Aleksandar Vucic’s fiery nationalist rhetoric to preserve Serbian sovereignty, the other a cry for transparency and accountability — encapsulate the nation’s current political upheaval.


The students have been vehemently protesting the tragic collapse of a concrete canopy in Novi Sad in November last year, which killed 15 people. This disaster, widely attributed to governmental negligence and endemic corruption, has become a powerful symbol of the failures of Vucic’s government. The students, initially mobilized by the calamity, have evolved into leaders of a nationwide anti-graft movement. Their efforts reflect a broader sentiment among Serbians that the political elite led by Vucic’s Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) has become entrenched in corruption and authoritarian practices.


The student protest in Kragujevac was particularly poignant. The town holds historical significance as the site of Serbia’s 1835 Constitution, which sought to curtail the power of the ruling elite under the Ottoman Empire. Today, students flocked to Kragujevac not only to demand justice for the victims of the Novi Sad tragedy but to call for the renewal of Serbia’s democratic principles.


The protests have evolved into a movement with wide-reaching support, transcending student bodies to include activists, civil society groups, and ordinary citizens who have grown disillusioned with Serbia’s political status quo. Over the past three months, the movement has led to significant concessions from the government, including the resignation of the Prime Minister, as well as criminal charges for 13 individuals involved in the corruption scandal surrounding the Novi Sad accident. Yet, the students remain unsatisfied, insisting that full accountability must be achieved before they will stop protesting.


Vucic, however, has dismissed the protests as part of a foreign plot to destabilize Serbia. In his rhetoric, he has repeatedly accused Western powers of trying to undermine his government and create chaos in the region. His speech on Statehood Day mirrored this narrative, warning that Serbia’s enemies are actively working to bring down the country’s leadership. He even suggested that foreign funds are being used to orchestrate the protests. Despite these claims, Vucic has been unable to provide tangible evidence of such foreign interference. For many Serbians, this increasingly paranoid tone feels like a last-ditch effort by a president whose hold on power is beginning to slip.


While Vucic’s nationalistic appeal still resonates with many Serbs, particularly in rural areas and among those who feel threatened by the idea of Serbia’s integration into the European Union, his government’s failures in governance are becoming harder to ignore. The ongoing protests, combined with Vucic’s diminishing credibility, have exposed deep fractures in Serbia’s political landscape. The president’s focus on a conspiracy theory involving foreign powers is seen by many as an attempt to distract from the real issues of corruption and rule of law.


The students, however, remain cautious about the involvement of opposition political parties, many of whom they accuse of being equally compromised by corruption. Their movement has thus far resisted calls for the formation of a transitional government to oversee fair elections, preferring to keep its focus on root-and-branch political reform. This stance has left Vucic with limited space to negotiate with his opposition, as the legitimacy of his leadership is increasingly questioned by the younger generation.


In the coming days, Serbia’s political crisis will likely deepen. The students’ ability to maintain momentum, despite efforts to discredit them, will be crucial in determining the outcome of the struggle for Serbia’s future. A new era of reform, accountability, and democratic renewal is possible, but it will require more than just rallies and protests.

Comments


bottom of page