top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

A Battle for the Future

Updated: Feb 19, 2025

The Serbian government’s failure in the face of a deadly accident has sparked a youth-led revolution that threatens to unseat its long-time populist president.

Serbian

In Serbia, Statehood Day last week saw a dramatic demonstration of the growing divide between the establishment and a disillusioned populace desperate for change. Thousands of students gathered in Kragujevac, demanding justice and an end to corruption. The contrasting messages — President Aleksandar Vucic’s fiery nationalist rhetoric to preserve Serbian sovereignty, the other a cry for transparency and accountability — encapsulate the nation’s current political upheaval.


The students have been vehemently protesting the tragic collapse of a concrete canopy in Novi Sad in November last year, which killed 15 people. This disaster, widely attributed to governmental negligence and endemic corruption, has become a powerful symbol of the failures of Vucic’s government. The students, initially mobilized by the calamity, have evolved into leaders of a nationwide anti-graft movement. Their efforts reflect a broader sentiment among Serbians that the political elite led by Vucic’s Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) has become entrenched in corruption and authoritarian practices.


The student protest in Kragujevac was particularly poignant. The town holds historical significance as the site of Serbia’s 1835 Constitution, which sought to curtail the power of the ruling elite under the Ottoman Empire. Today, students flocked to Kragujevac not only to demand justice for the victims of the Novi Sad tragedy but to call for the renewal of Serbia’s democratic principles.


The protests have evolved into a movement with wide-reaching support, transcending student bodies to include activists, civil society groups, and ordinary citizens who have grown disillusioned with Serbia’s political status quo. Over the past three months, the movement has led to significant concessions from the government, including the resignation of the Prime Minister, as well as criminal charges for 13 individuals involved in the corruption scandal surrounding the Novi Sad accident. Yet, the students remain unsatisfied, insisting that full accountability must be achieved before they will stop protesting.


Vucic, however, has dismissed the protests as part of a foreign plot to destabilize Serbia. In his rhetoric, he has repeatedly accused Western powers of trying to undermine his government and create chaos in the region. His speech on Statehood Day mirrored this narrative, warning that Serbia’s enemies are actively working to bring down the country’s leadership. He even suggested that foreign funds are being used to orchestrate the protests. Despite these claims, Vucic has been unable to provide tangible evidence of such foreign interference. For many Serbians, this increasingly paranoid tone feels like a last-ditch effort by a president whose hold on power is beginning to slip.


While Vucic’s nationalistic appeal still resonates with many Serbs, particularly in rural areas and among those who feel threatened by the idea of Serbia’s integration into the European Union, his government’s failures in governance are becoming harder to ignore. The ongoing protests, combined with Vucic’s diminishing credibility, have exposed deep fractures in Serbia’s political landscape. The president’s focus on a conspiracy theory involving foreign powers is seen by many as an attempt to distract from the real issues of corruption and rule of law.


The students, however, remain cautious about the involvement of opposition political parties, many of whom they accuse of being equally compromised by corruption. Their movement has thus far resisted calls for the formation of a transitional government to oversee fair elections, preferring to keep its focus on root-and-branch political reform. This stance has left Vucic with limited space to negotiate with his opposition, as the legitimacy of his leadership is increasingly questioned by the younger generation.


In the coming days, Serbia’s political crisis will likely deepen. The students’ ability to maintain momentum, despite efforts to discredit them, will be crucial in determining the outcome of the struggle for Serbia’s future. A new era of reform, accountability, and democratic renewal is possible, but it will require more than just rallies and protests.

Comments


bottom of page