top of page

By:

Quad Najmi and PTI

17 June 2026 at 5:11:32 pm

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met...

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met Speaker Om Birla informally on Wednesday, claiming the support of six of the party's nine MPs in the Lower House, sources said. Thursday's high-stakes meeting in Delhi will legally and physically define whether Uddhav Thackeray retains his parliamentary strength or faces another devastating party division, the third since Raj Thackeray split Shiv Sena in 2006. Sources in Sena (UBT) said the rival camp still doesn't have the support of six MPs. They claim two of the six rebels have reportedly changed their mind. In a swift counter-offensive to contain the damage, the party high command issued a mandatory three-line whip, summoning an emergency parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi on Thursday to force a physical showdown where the MPs will have to mark their presence physically. The developments triggered a day of high political drama in the national capital, marked by a furious, expletive-laden press conference by Raut, a reported counter-meeting by the rebel faction with Lok Sabha Speaker Birla, and sharp condemnation from the Congress. The internal fracture was visible at Sanjay Raut's press briefing, where only three other Lok Sabha MPs, Arvind Sawant, Anil Desai, and Rajabhau Waje, stood by him. The remaining six lawmakers were conspicuously absent; their exact whereabouts are unknown. The Sena (UBT) has nine MPs in the Lok Sabha, and at least two‑thirds of them would be required to form a separate group. Apart from Desai, Waje and Sawant, the other six MPs are Sanjay Patil, Sanjay Deshmukh, Omprakash Raje Nimbalkar, Bhausaheb Wakchaure, Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar and Sanjay Jadhav Not Reachable The six MPs stopped responding or became unavailable since Wednesday forenoon, after which the party stopped contacting them. They said when the party contacted Mumbai North East MP, Sanjay Dina Patil, he told party leaders that he was not with the rebel group. The party had asked them to submit a letter to the Lok Sabha Speaker, which he has not submitted so far. Later in the day, sources claimed that the group of six rebel lawmakers had privately met the Lok Sabha Speaker to claim a two-thirds majority in the Lower House, the precise threshold required to escape disqualification under the anti-defection law. Simultaneously, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, who split the undivided Shiv Sena in 2022, was reportedly camping in Delhi to oversee the operational layout of the defection of MPs. He returned to his home town Thane in Wednesday night. He is reportedly studying all the legal aspects before taking a final call before the party’s foundation day on Friday. Speaker’s Role Following reports of the rebels' move, a loyalist delegation consisting of Raut, Sawant, and Desai rushed to meet Speaker Birla to file a formal representation urging him to reject any unlawful group alignment. Desai argued that the legal provisions are strictly on the side of the original organisational structure. "Under the law, a splinter group cannot simply merge with another party on its own, even if they have two-thirds support. Only the original administrative party holds that right," Desai told reporters, adding that the Speaker assured them he would thoroughly examine every legal aspect before rendering a decision. The widening panic inside the party also triggered a public, familial disconnect involving missing Hingoli MP Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar. While the MP remained unreachable, his son, Krushna Patil Ashtikar, the MVA's official candidate for Thursday's Maharashtra Legislative Council elections, released a video statement strongly defending Uddhav Thackeray. "I am a Shiv Sainik of Uddhav Thackeray. There is no room for doubt when it comes to me," the younger Ashtikar stated.

A Necessary Liability

Despite questions over his health, the Bihar veteran remains indispensable to the NDA’s electoral arithmetic.

Bihar
Bihar

For decades, Nitish Kumar has been the linchpin of Bihar’s political landscape. His reputation as Sushashan Babu (‘Mr. Good Governance’) and his knack for shifting alliances have ensured his survival despite numerous upheavals. But now, at 74, murmurs about his health and cognitive decline have cast a shadow over his leadership. Critics, led by political strategist-turned-activist Prashant Kishor and the Congress, are raising uncomfortable questions. Allegations of erratic behavior, forgetting names and diminished administrative grip have fueled speculation. Yet, for all the uncertainty surrounding his condition, the BJP cannot afford to discard him.


Kishor’s call for a medical bulletin on Kumar’s mental health has amplified concerns already brewing within Bihar’s political circles. Reports of his missteps - laughing during the national anthem, fumbling through public addresses and mistaking locations - have given his opponents plenty of ammunition. His declining health forced him to skip the Bihar Business Connect Summit, a crucial event for the state’s economic ambitions. But even as doubts mount, the JD(U) remains adamant and his son, Nishant Kumar, is making quiet moves to ensure his father remains in power.


For the BJP, this presents a conundrum. With Assembly elections looming, Nitish Kumar’s JD(U) remains vital to its coalition’s electoral calculus. The BJP has twice the number of seats as the JD(U) in the Bihar Assembly, yet it continues to accommodate Kumar’s leadership. Why? Because the party understands that Kumar’s influence extends beyond mere numbers.


In Bihar’s complex caste-driven politics, Kumar’s appeal to the Kurmi and Koeri OBC groups is invaluable. While the BJP enjoys robust support among upper castes, it struggles to penetrate the broader OBC and EBC vote banks without Kumar’s backing. The JD(U), despite its electoral fluctuations, has consistently maintained a vote share between 15-25 percent, making it a crucial ally.


The results of the 2024 Lok Sabha election reinforced this reality. The BJP-led NDA secured 30 out of 40 seats in Bihar, but this success was largely because the JD(U) matched the BJP’s tally of 12 seats. Without the JD(U), the BJP risks not only losing numerical strength but also breaking the delicate caste coalition that has kept the RJD at bay.


Should the BJP sideline Kumar, the consequences could be dire. The anti-RJD vote would splinter, allowing Tejashwi Yadav’s party, with its formidable Muslim-Yadav base, to consolidate power. The BJP has historically struggled to make inroads among these communities, making Kumar’s ability to bridge the gap essential.


Beyond electoral arithmetic, Nitish Kumar’s governance record remains his strongest selling point. His tenure has been marked by improvements in infrastructure, law and order, and economic growth. Initiatives such as the Saat Nischay scheme (Seven Resolves) have burnished his image as a development-oriented leader. Despite his political flip-flopping, his administration remains a preferable alternative to the RJD’s legacy of Jungle Raj.


Moreover, unlike many of his rivals, Kumar has largely stayed clear of corruption scandals. The JD(U) does not carry the baggage of scams that have plagued the RJD, whose de facto leader, Tejashwi Yadav, is still battling allegations from his family’s time in power.


Despite Kumar’s declining health, the BJP remains cautious about pushing him aside. The question is not whether the BJP wants to move beyond Kumar but whether it can do so without imploding its own coalition. Nitish Kumar, ever the political survivor, has made it clear he intends to stay. His son Nishant’s increasing presence signals an attempt to secure a political succession plan within the JD(U). But the BJP, wary of another family-driven power structure in Bihar, is unlikely to entertain such an arrangement.


The BJP’s best bet is to ensure a transition that does not alienate Kumar’s core voters. The party has been strategically elevating its own leaders in Bihar, but none command the same cross-caste appeal as Kumar. A misstep could embolden the RJD, allowing Tejashwi Yadav to exploit any rift within the NDA.

Comments


bottom of page