top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

An Inspector Calls

The murder of Raja Raghuvanshi stunned Meghalaya, but the state’s police force swiftly cracked the case and salvaged its honour.

Meghalaya
Meghalaya

Meghalaya is not typically associated with violent crime. Yet the calculated murder of Raja Raghuvanshi, whose honeymoon in the quiet hills of the northeastern state ended in a brutal betrayal by his wife Sonam, has shattered Meghalaya’s peace.


Amid the nationwide outcry and the expected media circus, it was the Meghalaya Police that rose to the occasion with professionalism and calm resolve in cracking an often-bizarre case.


When Sonam Raghuvanshi and her husband checked out of a homestay in the postcard-pretty village of Nongriat on May 23, no one suspected that Raja would never be seen alive again. Yet, less than two weeks later, his decomposing body was recovered from a gorge in Cherrapunji.


Initially, the victim’s family, outraged and grieving, demanded a CBI probe and denounced the Meghalaya Police as inefficient. But that assessment swiftly changed when, in the span of a week, the state’s police force, assisted by a specially-formed SIT, unravelled a case that stretched from Shillong to Ghazipur to Sagar.


They traced the web of phone calls, pieced together surveillance footage, tracked down the four contract killers, secured a confession, and finally brought to light the shadowy figure of ‘Sanjay Verma’ - the supposedly mysterious man with whom Sonam had spoken over 230 times in a span of just over a month.


‘Sanjay’ was none other than Raj Kushwaha, Sonam’s former lover, and the alleged mastermind of the plot. To avoid suspicion, Sonam had saved his number under a false identity. Mobile records show that between March 1 and April 8, Sonam and Raj/Sanjay spoke for up to an hour per call, meticulous planning the crime, say authorities.


On June 8, just hours after the arrest of the three hitmen, Sonam had surfaced in Ghazipur, surrendered herself, and confessed. Her cousin, Jitendra Raghuvanshi, is also alleged to have financed the first instalment for Raja’s murder.


Under pressure from both families and the national media, the SIT and the Meghalaya police have performed splendidly. In a political landscape where state police forces are often dismissed as sluggish, corrupt or incompetent, the Meghalaya Police delivered in spades.


The case has also cast a spotlight on Meghalaya’s tourism infrastructure. Questions were raised about the absence of a tourist guide with the couple. But as Tourism Minister Paul Lyngdoh rightly pointed out, the state cannot compel visitors to take guides. The couple chose to venture alone. What the state can do is strengthen safety protocols and work more closely with the tourism sector to enhance oversight. For it takes only one gruesome murder to unfairly sully the image of a region known more for its hospitality and tranquillity than homicide.


None of this will bring Raja Raghuvanshi back. His coldly premeditated murder is a reminder that even the most scenic places are not immune to urban cruelties. But Meghalaya, lauded for its scenery, has now shown that it can also be a model for competent policing.


In the age of viral trials and public outrage, the Meghalaya Police have followed the evidence, acted without fear or favour, and upheld the rule of law. Their use of digital forensics, phone records and inter-state coordination was textbook. There was no sensationalism, no premature leaks and no unnecessary detentions; just quiet, competent work. Even under pressure from a sceptical public and the victim’s grieving family, they maintained composure and procedural integrity.


This is not just a vindication of their methods but a lesson to larger, richer, better-equipped forces across India. The Meghalaya authorities have shown that even in a state which rarely makes headlines, justice, when pursued with rigour and humility, can prevail.


In doing so, they not only solved a brutal crime but also defended the dignity of their state. At a time when public trust in law enforcement is frayed, the Meghalaya Police have reminded the country what effective policing can look like even in the remotest corners of the Northeast.


Comments


bottom of page