top of page

By:

Bharati Dubey

17 May 2026 at 1:38:10 am

Raja Shivaji sparks a new era for Marathi cinema

Mumbai: As Raja Shivaji marches steadily towards the Rs 100 crore mark, the film has reignited debate around the future of the Marathi film industry. Having already crossed Rs 80 crore at the Indian box office, the historical drama is now only the second Marathi film after Sairat to achieve the milestone. Its success has raised a larger question within the trade: can a major blockbuster finally attract sustained investment into Marathi cinema, an industry often marked by cycles of growth and...

Raja Shivaji sparks a new era for Marathi cinema

Mumbai: As Raja Shivaji marches steadily towards the Rs 100 crore mark, the film has reignited debate around the future of the Marathi film industry. Having already crossed Rs 80 crore at the Indian box office, the historical drama is now only the second Marathi film after Sairat to achieve the milestone. Its success has raised a larger question within the trade: can a major blockbuster finally attract sustained investment into Marathi cinema, an industry often marked by cycles of growth and slowdown? Much of the buzz surrounding the film stems from the support it received from prominent Hindi film stars, several of whom reportedly came on board to back the project and the industry. Trade analyst Girish Wankhede believes the film’s biggest achievement lies in the scale of collaboration it represents. “The real strength of Raja Shivaji lies in its creative ensemble star cast, which Riteish Deshmukh successfully brought together. By roping in heavyweight Hindi stars like Abhishek Bachchan, Sanjay Dutt, and Salman Khan, the film showcases the immense combined value of cross-industry collaboration. This strong gesture of Hindi cinema’s biggest names extending full support to a Marathi project has created a powerful impression, generating tremendous curiosity and respect for Marathi cinema among audiences, investors, and other industries. It underscores how Marathi films can now command pan-Indian attention and star power,” he says. At the same time, Wankhede feels it may still be premature to call the film a runaway commercial success given its production scale and costs. “What is heartening is the visible new energy and creative fuel that Riteish Deshmukh has infused into Marathi cinema. With him at the helm of affairs, the film looks strong and polished, and this momentum, further amplified by the star support, is already drawing serious attention from investors who were earlier hesitant about the regional space,” he adds. Producer Suniel Wadhwa, Co-Founder and Director of Karmic Films, says the film’s performance could play an important role in rebuilding investor confidence in theatrical cinema. “The success of Raja Shivaji could significantly improve investor confidence in theatrical cinema, especially at a time when many non-film investors have become cautious about the sector. If the film succeeds as a large-scale theatrical event rather than just an opening weekend phenomenon, it will reinforce the belief that culturally rooted Indian stories still possess massive commercial potential across regions and demographics,” he says. However, Wadhwa points out that the industry continues to face deep structural challenges. “One of the biggest is the shortage of true theatrical stars who can create urgency for audiences to step into cinemas. Streaming has created visibility, but not necessarily ticket-selling mythology. At the same time, India remains heavily under-screened, and even strong films often struggle with inadequate show slots, limited showcasing windows, and overcrowded release calendars. Many films today are judged within the first 48–72 hours, leaving little room for organic word-of-mouth growth,” he says. According to him, the theatrical business is evolving rather than disappearing. “Audiences are now reserving cinema outings for event-driven experiences — spectacle, emotion, mythology, action, horror-comedy, and culturally resonant storytelling. Films that can create that collective viewing urgency will continue to attract both audiences and serious investment capital,” he adds. The Marathi film industry has witnessed a mixed year so far. More than two dozen films have released, but only a handful — including Raja Shivaji, Kranti Vidyalay Marathi Madhyam, Aga Aga Sunbai Mahnatay Sasubai, and Super Duper — have performed strongly at the box office. Veteran journalist Dilip Thakur believes Marathi cinema has already begun regaining momentum after the slowdown caused by the pandemic. “New Marathi films are getting launched regularly. The upcoming film Bapya had its screening at Sunny Super Sound, which was attended by non-Marathi journalists in big numbers. The story of Bapya is complex and difficult to make. The point here is that a producer agreed to put his money into the film. Sabar Bonda was another difficult subject which won an award at Sundance. So, producers willing to invest money in such subjects is one positive sign,” he says. Thakur also points to the continued appetite for mainstream Marathi entertainers. “The boom after Sairat still exists in Marathi cinema. There was a setback for four years because of Covid, but the industry has gained momentum. Ravi Jadhav’s new film Fulawara, based on tamasha folk art, will soon go on floors in Pune,” he says. He further notes that Marathi cinema is increasingly attracting investors from outside the industry. “Most Marathi films have non-Marathi investors. They are putting in money because there is business in Marathi cinema. But not every film becomes a hit. Subhash Ghai also produced a few Marathi films. If the subject is good, people are willing to invest,” he adds. Not everyone, however, is convinced that one major hit can alter the industry’s fortunes overnight. Nitin Datar, president of the Cinema Owners Association, remains cautious about reading too much into the film’s success. “Only one film success is not going to bring investors. In the last five years, out of nearly 500 films produced, the success rate has not been encouraging,” he says. Datar acknowledges that the presence of Hindi stars has helped boost the film’s commercial appeal but stresses that Marathi cinema still lacks enough bankable stars capable of consistently drawing audiences to theatres. “The production houses and directors have attracted audiences. Unfortunately, producers haven’t been successful in attracting financial assistance, which has resulted in low production and advertising budgets. But if films succeed in pulling audiences over the weekend, exhibitors automatically increase shows and reduce screenings of underperforming films from other languages. The audience is always there, waiting to visit theatres in large numbers for a good film,” he says. For now, Raja Shivaji has undeniably given Marathi cinema a strong moment in the spotlight. Whether that momentum translates into long-term financial confidence and sustained industry growth remains the larger question.

Appeasement Nation

The blood has barely dried in the meadows of Pahalgam, where more than 25 tourists, mostly Hindus, were gunned down in cold blood. But India’s so-called ‘secular elite’ have already started a ritual of denial. No sooner had grieving widows and orphaned children begun recounting how men were segregated by religion and executed for being Hindu, than a deeply dishonest slogan flooded social media that “terrorism has no religion.”


The attackers did not think so. They demanded the recitation of the kalma before gunning the tourists down. They laughed while blowing out the brains of men in front of their children. This was no act of blind rage but a conscious, ideological act of Islamic terrorism. But say that out loud in India, and you will be called a ‘bigot’ disrupting the ‘composite fabric’ of the nation. Speak of jihad, and the usual cabal of academics, activists and progressive journalists crawl out of their echo chambers to accuse you of ‘Islamophobia.’


But Islamic terrorists across the globe are not shy. They do not claim to act in the name of no religion. They invoke the Quran, scream ‘Allahu Akbar’ before murdering innocents. They justify their actions as service to the ummah.


As the nation mourned Pahalgam, few in the Opposition unequivocally condemned the attack as an ‘Islamic terror strike.’ The most disgraceful reaction came from Robert Vadra, husband of Congress scion Priyanka Gandhi, when he suggested that the Pahalgam attackers struck because Muslims were being mistreated in India. Others like PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti, whose party has long jostled with separatists, stopped short of blaming Pakistan.


Why this squeamishness? Because India has spent 75 years institutionalising Muslim appeasement. From the rewriting of history books to whitewashing atrocities of Islamic invaders, to the failure to properly integrate the Muslim community into the nation as citizens first and not as a perpetually aggrieved religious bloc, India has long walked on eggshells around its largest minority.


The Nehruvian consensus declared that Muslims could not be integrated as equal citizens unless pampered, protected and patronised. That philosophy gave us everything from Article 370 to the Shah Bano betrayal, to decades of soft-pedalling on jihadist violence. It has taught generations of Indians to internalize the idea that Islamic violence is somehow our fault.


This rot is evident in the civilian response to Pahalgam. It emboldens terrorists who know that India’s elite will twist itself into knots to avoid naming them. It demoralizes victims who see their pain erased in real time. It weakens national unity by forcing a dishonest narrative upon the people.


The attack in Pahalgam should have been a moment of reckoning. Instead, it has exposed the rotting moral timbers of our national conscience. Islamic terrorism is real. It has a name and a doctrine. Until India musters the courage to confront it without euphemism, it will remain vulnerable not just to bullets, but to a thousand cuts of cowardice.

Comments


bottom of page