top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Breaking the Bloc

Updated: Jan 31, 2025

The withdrawal of Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso marks a turning point for both the future of ECOWAS and the region’s security landscape.

ECOWAS

The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), founded in 1975 to foster economic and political integration across West Africa, is witnessing a major crack after three of its most embattled members - Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger - officially withdrew from the regional bloc, marking the culmination of over a year of escalating tensions and diplomatic impasses. This split, following a series of military coups in these countries, signifies a new chapter in the political dynamics of West Africa that could reverberate across the region and beyond.


In 2020, Mali was the first to fall under junta rule, followed by Burkina Faso in 2022 and Niger in 2023. Each of these countries experienced a military coup that ousted democratically elected leaders, prompting a swift and forceful response from ECOWAS, which has long advocated for democratic governance in the region. In reaction, the bloc imposed sanctions, including border closures, a no-fly zone, and the freezing of central bank assets, measures that hit the fragile economies of these countries hard.


However, the ECOWAS’ measures only seemed to strengthen the resolve of the juntas. The military leaders of Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger condemned what they saw as ECOWAS’ close ties to Western powers, which they accused of pursuing foreign interests in the region. In response, the three countries formed the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), a new bloc designed to assert their sovereignty, reject external interference, and promote a more independent regional agenda.


In December last year, ECOWAS offered a six-month grace period for the countries to reconsider their departure, but the junta governments were resolute. The creation of the AES was a pivotal shift in West African geopolitics. The new bloc, spearheaded by Mali’s military ruler Assimi Goïta, aims to foster stronger regional cooperation, not only in political and economic spheres but also in security. To counter the growing jihadist threat, which has devastated much of the Sahel, AES countries have vowed to establish a 5,000-strong military force. This move reflects a desire for greater autonomy in managing security challenges, with Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger already receiving increasing support from Russia, including weapons and mercenaries, despite the ongoing instability.


While the AES offers these countries an alternative to ECOWAS, the long-term viability of this new alliance remains uncertain. All three countries are impoverished, landlocked, and highly dependent on their neighbours for trade and economic ties. In the short term, the withdrawal from ECOWAS might grant the juntas greater autonomy, but the three nations may soon face increased isolation and a deepening economic crisis. The impact of severing ties with a regional economic bloc that facilitates the free movement of people and goods cannot be understated, particularly for countries whose economic survival is heavily reliant on cross-border trade.


For ECOWAS, the departure of three member states is a profound blow. The bloc, which at its peak represented over 400 million people, now loses 76 million citizens and a vast expanse of territory. The loss of these countries, all of which are among the poorest in the region, challenges ECOWAS’s credibility and ability to enforce its will. The bloc’s repeated failures to prevent the coups and uphold democratic governance have exacerbated a legitimacy crisis that was already simmering beneath the surface.


Moreover, ECOWAS’s capacity to address regional security challenges is now under greater scrutiny. The Sahel, an arid region south of the Sahara, has become a global hotspot for jihadist violence. The insurgencies in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger have inflicted devastating casualties, and the withdrawal of these countries from ECOWAS could exacerbate an already fragile security situation. The threat of jihadist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS has only intensified in recent years, and the departure of these countries from a cooperative security framework could hinder efforts to combat extremism effectively.

Comments


bottom of page