top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

‘Bharat Ratna to Savarkar will increase its prestige’

Mumbai: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday threw his full weight behind the long-standing demand to confer the Bharat Ratna on Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, asserting that the Hindutva ideologue’s inclusion would enhance the dignity of the country’s highest civilian honour. Bhagwat, who explained the genesis and growth of the RSS over past 100 years in two lectures at the Nehru Centre here on Saturday and Sunday, replied to several...

‘Bharat Ratna to Savarkar will increase its prestige’

Mumbai: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday threw his full weight behind the long-standing demand to confer the Bharat Ratna on Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, asserting that the Hindutva ideologue’s inclusion would enhance the dignity of the country’s highest civilian honour. Bhagwat, who explained the genesis and growth of the RSS over past 100 years in two lectures at the Nehru Centre here on Saturday and Sunday, replied to several questions. While replying to one of the questions, he remarked, “If Swatantraveer Savarkar is given the Bharat Ratna, the prestige of the Bharat Ratna itself will increase.” He was asked, why there has been a delay in conferring the Bharat Ratna on Savarkar, in reply to which, Bhagwat said, “I am not part of that committee. But if I meet someone, I will ask. Even without that honour, he rules the hearts of millions of people.” he added. Social Divisions Bhagwat replied to questions that were clubbed in 14 different groups ranging from national security to environment, social harmony, youth, arts and sports. Whenever the questions suggested or expressed expectations that the RSS should do certain things, Bhagwat stressed on the involvement of the society and initiative from the society in resolving the problems. While addressing the critical issue of Uniform Civil Code, Bhagwat stated that the UCC should be framed by taking everyone into confidence and must not lead to social divisions. In the same way while replying to the question related to illegal migrants in the country, Bhagwat urged people to “detect and report” the “illegal infiltrators” to the police. He also urged people not to give them any employment and to be more “vigilant.” Backing SIR He highlighted that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise has already revealed the “foreigners” living in the country. “The government has a lot to do regarding infiltration. They have to detect and deport. This wasn’t happening until now, but it has started little by little, and it will gradually increase. When the census or the SIR is conducted, many people come to light who are not citizens of this country; they are automatically excluded from the process,” he said. “But we can do one thing: we can work on detection. Their language gives them away. We should detect them and report them to the appropriate authorities. We should inform the police that we suspect these people are foreigners, and they should investigate and keep an eye on them, and we will also keep an eye on them. We will not give employment to any foreigner. If someone is from our country, we will give them employment, but not to foreigners. You should be a little more vigilant and aware,” he added. SC Chief Emphasising the inclusivity of the Sangh, he said that anyone can become ‘Sarsanghchalak’ (RSS chief), including the SC and STs, as the decision is solely dependent on the work that any individual put for the organisation. “Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shudra or Brahmin does not qualify for the Sarsanghchalak position (RSS Chief), a Hindu will become the one who works and is best available. A Hindu will become, and that can also be an SC or ST. Anyone can become it depends on the work. Today, if you see, all classes have representation in the Sangh. The decision is taken on the basis of one who works and is best available,” he said. He pointed out that when the RSS was founded, its work began in a Brahmin-dominated community and hence, most of its founders were Brahmins, which led to the organisation being labelled as a Brahmin outfit at the time. People always look for an organisation that has representatives from their community, he said. “If I were to choose a chief, I would go by the ‘best available candidate’ criterion. When I was appointed RSS chief, there were many best candidates, but they were not available. I was the one who could be relieved from duties and appointed,” he said. He said that to belong to the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe communities is not a disqualification, and neither is being a Brahmin a qualification to become the RSS chief. Ready to step down if Sangh asks for Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday said the Sangh had asked him to continue working despite his age, while stressing that he would step down from the post whenever the organisation directs him to do so. “There is no election to the post of RSS chief. Regional and divisional heads appoint the chief. Generally, it is said that after turning 75, one should work without holding any post,” Bhagwat said. “I have completed 75 years and informed the RSS, but the organisation asked me to continue working. Whenever the RSS asks me to step down, I will do so, but retirement from work will never happen,” he said.

Bridges to Nowhere

In PM Modi’s home state of Gujarat, infrastructure collapses continue to be met with condolences, but its government refuses to rise to the occasion.

Gujarat
Gujarat

Another day, another bridge collapse in Gujarat. This time it was the Gambhira bridge—an arterial link between Central Gujarat and Saurashtra—that gave way without warning, sending three vehicles plummeting into the Mahisagar river. At least 13 people have died.


The bridge, built in 1985, had been crying out for help. Engineers, local leaders and residents had flagged its dangerous condition for years. A letter in 2021 warned of “unusual vibrations” while slabs were separating so visibly that one could see the river below. And yet, as with many such warnings in India, the file likely gathered dust. Cosmetic surface repairs were conducted, and the trucks kept rolling over a ticking time bomb until that bomb exploded.


The Gujarat government, led by Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, who also holds the Roads & Buildings portfolio, was hardly blindsided. A Rs. 212 crore replacement bridge had already been approved three months ago. But no urgency followed. Instead, the state chose to gamble with the lives of commuters.


The collapse of the Gambhira bridge is merely the latest addition to a gruesome litany of infrastructural failures in the state that Prime Minister Narendra Modi once governed and still touts as a model. In 2022, 135 people died when a 19th-century suspension bridge in Morbi collapsed days after reopening. The company responsible for its ‘renovation’ had neither structural expertise nor proper clearance. That did not stop the state from handing it the contract.


The pattern repeats with maddening regularity. In June 2023, a freshly inaugurated bridge in Surat developed cracks after the first spell of rain. In Palanpur, the girders of an under-construction highway bridge collapsed, crushing two people. In Valsad, parts of a yet-to-be-inaugurated overbridge broke off. In Tapi, a brand-new 100-metre bridge caved in entirely. Each time, a few engineers are suspended, the contractor is blacklisted, and the Chief Minister orders an inquiry that goes nowhere.


This is what governance by press release looks like. The Gujarat model, once lauded for administrative efficiency, now runs on the fumes of old slogans. Far from delivering on the promise of speed and scale, the BJP-led government is derailing under its own weight. Even Bengal’s ruling Trinamool Congress couldn’t resist a jab, posting a photo montage of the Vadodara and Morbi tragedies with the caption: “Double Engine. Double Disaster.”


It would be tempting to chalk these failures up to India’s broader infrastructural woes. But Gujarat’s failures stand out for their frequency, visibility and the absence of meaningful reform despite repeated loss of life. After the Morbi disaster, the state promised new policies and inspection frameworks. It even informed the High Court of measures to audit bridges under municipal control. And yet, just months later, Gambhira collapsed under a burden it was never built to carry.


The problem is structural, both literally and institutionally. Oversight is fragmented, auditing is perfunctory and political patronage allows discredited contractors to return through back doors. Even when blacklisted, companies often morph into new entities, aided by opaque procurement rules and bureaucratic complicity. Each time, the price is paid in corpses.


Prime Minister Modi, on a foreign tour, swiftly announced Rs 2 lakh for the families of the dead and Rs 50,000 for the injured. But condolences are no substitute for accountability. Nor can compensation wash away the state’s culpability.


What Gujarat needs is not more ribbon cuttings or grand announcements but ruthless reform. Bridge audits must be independent, public and mandatory. Contractor histories should be accessible to citizens and courts alike. Departments must be held legally accountable for ignoring red flags. Infrastructure is about maintaining what is built. And that requires political will, not photo-ops.


Until then, India’s bridges will continue to crumble. And with each collapse, another warning will go unheard until it is too late.

Comments


bottom of page