top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Tibetan refugees protest in Mumbai

Supporters from the Tibetan Youth Congress react during a protest at Azad Maidan in Mumbai on Monday against China's new ethnic unity law. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Over 250 Tibetan refugees, activists and members of the Friends of Tibet took out a rally and demonstrated near the Chinese Consulate in Mumbai as part of an international action to protest against China’s new Ethnic Unity and Progress Promotion Law (EUPPL). The Tibetans living in Mumbai were joined by other protestors from...

Tibetan refugees protest in Mumbai

Supporters from the Tibetan Youth Congress react during a protest at Azad Maidan in Mumbai on Monday against China's new ethnic unity law. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Over 250 Tibetan refugees, activists and members of the Friends of Tibet took out a rally and demonstrated near the Chinese Consulate in Mumbai as part of an international action to protest against China’s new Ethnic Unity and Progress Promotion Law (EUPPL). The Tibetans living in Mumbai were joined by other protestors from Bhandara (Maharashtra) and Mundgod (Karnataka) and a relay hunger strike was also taken up the Tibetan Youth Congress (TYC) in Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, said Coordinator, Tenzin Tsundue. The day started with a silent rally from Rajgriha, the home of the late Dr. B. R. Ambedkar to his memorial, Chaityabhoomi, both in Dadar. Another rally-cum-demonstration was carried out near Nariman Point where the Chinese Consulate is located and at the Azad Maidan, said Tsundue. “We carried out a peaceful protest at Nariman Point and wanted to go and submit a memorandum to the Chinese Consul-General. However, the police prevented us, detained a few Tibetans and sent them back to Azad Maidan,” Tsundue told ‘The Perfect Voice’, from the venue. He said that Tibetans and others like Uyghurs are strongly opposed to the new law which came into effect last week, despite criticism from the United Nations Organisation (UNO), Taiwan, TYC and human rights groups worldwide. Their prime concerns are that the (EUPPL) could place further restrictions on the minorities’ rights, deepen assimilation policies targeting the ethnic groups and dilute the protection to their respective languages, cultures and traditions. China’s Denial One provision is said to allow individuals to be held accountable for alleged violations of the Chinese laws even outside the country, raising apprehensions it could target the government’s critics or campaigners abroad. However, China has rubbished all allegations of rights abuses against the ethnic minority group, and reiterated that its policies aim to promote social stability, security and economic development for all. Unconvinced, Tibetans and Uyghurs have urged the international community to build pressure on China to strike down the EUPPL as “it aims to erase the minority communities”. The Mainland Affairs Council of Taiwan has argued that Taiwanese are already facing high risks travelling to China and now the country has “yet another law to fabricate charges”, and it could deploy it “to further suppress and prosecute human rights activists”. TYC slams China The TYC said that the international action today was dedicated to the memory of the supreme sacrifice of Lobga Rangzen who self-immolated himself outside the UN Headquarters in New York on July 2 to draw the world’s attention to the cause of Tibet. Rejecting the new law, the TYC said: “This legislation is not a law of unity but a political instrument to force assimilation of nations living under Chinese occupation, like Tibet, East Turkestan, Southern Mongolia, and Manchuria. Behind the language of ‘ethnic unity’ lies an agenda of Unilateral control by institutionalising policies aimed at assimilating Tibetans through political domination.” It accused China of attempts “to erase national identities by suppressing distinct languages, undermining religious institutions, rewriting history, destroying cultural heritage, separating children from their communities through state run colonial boarding schools, and replacing distinct identities with loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party”.

Burnt by the System

A horrifying protest in Odisha lays bare the collapse of institutional justice.


Odisha
Odisha

The gruesome death of a 20-year-old student at an autonomous college in Odisha, who set herself ablaze in a desperate protest against inaction on her complaint of sexual harassment by a professor, has ignited a firestorm of public fury while exposing the rot in India’s campus justice systems.

 

It has also cast an unforgiving spotlight on how Indian educational institutions, far from being places of safety and learning, have become sites of intimidation.

 

Earlier this week, the student, who was pursuing her B.Ed at Fakir Mohan Autonomous College walked towards the principal’s office, doused herself in kerosene and struck a match. She died three days later in an ICU in Bhubaneswar, having suffered burns to 95 percent of her body.

 

Her final act has shaken Odisha and much of India to its core, besides leading to the inevitable political slanging match.

 

The young woman had lodged a complaint on July 1, accusing the head of the education department of months of sexual harassment. She uploaded the complaint on social media, tagged student leaders and even posted chilling premonitions of her own death. She did everything a victim is told to do - complain through official channels and call for help.

 

Ten days later, amid mounting frustration, she and fellow students staged a protest. She had been promised resolution in seven days; instead, she was hounded. According to her father, the professor intimidated her and the college principal threatened rustication. The college’s Internal Complaints Committee gave the professor a clean chit.

 

Then came the self-immolation. It took her death for the police to arrest both the professor and principal and promises of justice from Odisha’s newly-elected Chief Minister, Mohan Charan Majhi.

 

Committees are being formed. But none of it can douse the inferno of rage sparked by the tragedy. The shameful incident is a damning indictment of the systemic rot in Indian academia. The Internal Complaints Committees, mandated by law after the Vishaka judgment and reinforced by the 2013 Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, are often toothless or compromised. In many institutions, especially in smaller towns, the committees serve more as shields for the accused than sanctuaries for the victims. Professors wield enormous influence over marksheets, careers, and reputations; a female student who dares complain often finds herself isolated and stigmatised.

 

In recent years, campuses across India have witnessed similar eruptions where students were punished for naming their abusers and protestors baton-charged for demanding action.


The power asymmetry between faculty and students, compounded by patriarchy and bureaucracy, ensures that many cases never see the light of day.

 

The political response has followed a grimly predictable arc. The Congress, sensing an opportunity, called it “organised murder by the system.” Rahul Gandhi accused the ruling BJP of enabling a culture of silence and complicity. The BJP, in turn, accused the opposition of politicising a tragedy.

 

Caught in the crossfire are grieving parents, stunned classmates, and a public that has seen this film far too many times. Governor Hari Babu Kambhampati has demanded a detailed report from the state government. Meanwhile, protests have erupted across Odisha, with opposition parties calling for a statewide bandh. Questions are also being raised about the conduct of the post-mortem, held at 2am, under police watch.

 

Perhaps the most haunting aspect of this case is not just the act of self-immolation, but how foreseeable it was. The victim had cried out for help in petitions and on social media. Her despair was visible, documented and shared. And yet, the institutional response was apathy laced with hostility. That she had to burn herself alive to be believed is a grotesque commentary on the failures of India’s educational and judicial systems.

 

In the wake of such a tragedy, it is tempting to focus on punishment. But the real challenge lies deeper. Unless Internal Complaints Committees are made genuinely independent and empowered and unless colleges are held accountable for safeguarding students, a similar incident is only waiting to happen.

 

We cannot let India’s campuses become cremation grounds for its daughters.

Comments


bottom of page